- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 蓝山科技关联方交易审计失败案例研究    

姓名:

 韩雨    

学号:

 20222116087    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 125700    

学科名称:

 管理学 - 审计    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 审计硕士    

学位类型:

 专业学位    

学位年度:

 2024    

学校:

 石河子大学    

院系:

 经济与管理学院    

专业:

 审计    

研究方向:

 不区分研究方向    

第一导师姓名:

 吕珺    

第一导师单位:

 石河子大学    

完成日期:

 2024-06-10    

答辩日期:

 2024-05-10    

外文题名:

 Case Study Of Bluemountain Technology's Related Party Transaction Audit Failure    

中文关键词:

 关联方 ; 关联方交易 ; 审计失败     

外文关键词:

   ; Related  ; part ; Related party transactions ;   ; Audit failures     

中文摘要:

按规披露的关联交易能有效减少企业的交易成本,提高企业的运营效率,为企业筹措资金、运用资金提供便利,是一项非常重要的交易手段。但是,上市公司还存在着一些违规的关联交易,在遭遇经营困难,市场环境下行时,诸多上市公司为避免退市或完成业绩目标,会选择一些不合规的方式调整财务数据,其中通过关联方交易是普遍的舞弊方式。《中国注册会计师审计准则第1323号——关联方》实施后,注册会计师对关联方交易的审计越来越重视。但是,存在部分关联方关系隐蔽,审计人员识别难度较大的问题。个别企业会利用法律未明确界定、但实则存在关联交易实质的关联方交易进行谋利,这就在无形中给审计过程增加了难度。在这个过程中,注册会计师能否识别出关联方交易的的违规操作,发表正确的审计意见,从而避免审计失败就显得至关重要。

本文的第一部分与第二部分重在对关联方、关联方交易及关联方交易审计等基础概念进行概括与总结,同时将本文运用到的相关理论进行梳理,以便更好的理解后续案例研究。文章第三部分在此基础上引入中兴财光华对蓝山科技的审计失败案例分析,第四章重在从四个层面剖析审计失败原因,在第五章提出相应对策。对于审计失败的原因,本文从审计程序、审计师职业道德、质量管理层面及执业环境四个角度展开分析。首先,在事务所提供审计服务中,关联方交易审计风险评估程序与实质性程序存在问题;其次,在职业道德层面,事务所未保持审计独立性,审计人员未勤勉尽责,未能保持充分的职业怀疑;在质量管理层面,事务所关联方交易的审计工作底稿不完整,质量复核存在纰漏;最后,在执业环境层面,事务所的审计执业环境不佳,监管部门的监管力度弱。相应的,本文就审计失败的原因提出建议:首先,提升事务所的审计业务质量。严格执行关联方交易风险评估程序及实质性程序;其次,加强事务所及会计师的职业道德。坚持保持事务所审计独立性、确保审计人员的勤勉尽责及强化审计人员识别关联方交易的职业怀疑能力;同时,提升事务所的质量管理。加强审计工作底稿质量管理与完善事务所项目质量复核制度;最后,优化事务所的执业环境,加强关联方交易的监管力度。

全文聚焦于微观事务所的视角与宏观审计环境的视角,对关交易审计失败的成因进行深入剖析,将有利于将关联交易审计中存在的普遍问题与隐蔽问题梳理清楚。这对改进关联方审计理论研究有一定的借鉴意义,也有助于会计师事务所在今后更好的应对日趋复杂的关联关系,有效降低防止审计失败的概率。

外文摘要:

Disclosed related party transactions in accordance with the rules can effectively reduce the transaction costs of enterprises, improve their operation efficiency, and provide convenience for enterprises to raise funds and use funds.It is a very important transaction means. However, there are still some illegal related party transactions in listed companies. When encountering operational difficulties and the market environment is down, many listed companies will choose some non-compliant ways to adjust their financial data in order to avoid delisting or complete performance targets, among which the benefit transmission through related party transactions is a common means. However, there are some related party relationships that are concealed, which are difficult for auditors to identify. Some enterprises will make use of the related party transactions that are not clearly defined by the law, but in fact there is the essence of related party transactions to make profits, which virtually increases the difficulty of the audit process. In this process, it is crucial that certified public accountants can identify the illegal operation of related party transactions and issue correct audit opinions to avoid audit failure.

The first and second parts of this article focus on summarizing and summarizing therelated party transactio audit, and comb the relevant theories used in this article, so as to better understand the follow-up case study. On this basis, the third part of the article introduces the case analysis of Zhongxing Caiguanghua's audit failure of BlueMountain Technology. The fourth chapter focuses on analyzing the reasons for audit failure from four aspects, and the fifth chapter puts forward corresponding countermeasures. For the reasons for audit failure, this article analyzes from four aspects: audit procedures, auditors' professional ethics, quality management and practice environment. First of all, in the audit service provided by the firm, there are problems in the implementation of the audit risk assessment procedures of related party transactions, and the improper use of substantive procedures. Secondly, in the aspect of professional ethics, the firm fails to maintain the audit independence, and the auditors fail to be diligent and responsible, and fail to maintain sufficient professional skepticism. In the aspect of quality management, the audit working papers of the firm's related party transactions are incomplete, and there are omissions in the quality review. Finally, in the aspect of practice environment, the audit practice environment of the firm is poor, and the supervision authority is weak. Accordingly, this article puts forward suggestions on the reasons for audit failure: first, improve the quality of the audit business of the firm. Strictly implement the risk assessment procedures and substantive procedures of related party transactions;secondly, strengthen the professional ethics of firms and accountants. Persist in maintaining the independence of audit firms, ensuring the diligence and responsibility of auditors and strengthening the professional ability of auditors to identify related party transactions;at the same time, improve the quality management of firms.Strengthen the quality management of audit working papers and improve the quality review system of firms;finally, optimize the practice environment of firms and strengthen the supervision of related party transactions.

The full text focuses on the perspective of micro firms and macro audit environment, it will be conducive to sorting out the common problems and concealed problems existing in the audit of related party transactions. This has certain reference significance for improving the theoretical research of related party audit, and also helps accounting firms better deal with the increasingly complex related relationship in the future, and effectively reduce the probability of audit failure.

参考文献:

[1]王应华.关联方关系及其交易审计中应关注的几个问题[J].中国注册会计师,2005(03):14-15.

[2]汪永兰,上市公司关联交易舞弊问题及其审计策略[J].财会通讯(学术版),2007,(10):69-71+79.

[3]熊守春.关联方交易审计问题研究[J].财会通讯,2009(28):88-89.

[4]张洁琳.关联方交易及其审计风险防范[J].财会月刊,2010(28):35.

[5]孙晓玲,覃银月.五粮液的关联方交易问题分析[J].财会月刊,2010(14):75-77.

[6]刘彬,韩传模.会计舞弊公司审计质量与事务所组织形式研究——基于处罚公告的博弈分析[J].会计之友,2011(20):112-116.

[7]赵振智,黄静.关联方关系及关联方交易审计[J].财会月刊,2012,(20):54-56.

[8]张婧.我国上市公司关联交易及动因的实证研究[D].山西大学,2012.

[9]郝玉贵,刘李晓.关联方交易舞弊风险内部控制与审计——基于紫鑫药业案例的研究[J].审计与经济研究,2012,27(04):26-35.

[10]周浩,陶晶.我国上市公司关联方交易现状研究[J].财会月刊,2013(08):18-21.

[11]朱文莉,任洁.上市公司关联方交易违规问题、特征与治理——来自阳煤化工的案例分析[J].财会通讯,2015(16):20-22.

[12]王昱涵.关联方审计成败分析[J].财会通讯,2017(28):95-97.

[13]段珺.利用关联方交易舞弊的审计策略分析[J].财会通讯,2017(25):105-108.

[14]李莫愁.审计准则与审计失败——基于中国证监会历年行政处罚公告的分析[J].审计与经济研究,2017,32(02):56-65.

[15]王昱涵.关联方审计成败分析[J].财会通讯,2017(28):95-97.

[16]关涟.浅议企业间隐性关联交易[J].国际税收,2018,(5):64-68.

[17]刘建国.浅议关联方交易对审计风险的影响——以乐视网为例[J].中国注册会计师,2018(11):118-120.

[18]郝玉贵,陈伊宁.会计师事务所连续受罚与审计监管分析——以L会计师事务所为例[J].财会月刊,2018(07):151-155.

[19]沃巍勇,罗联玬.浅析函证不当导致审计失败的原因及其应对措施[J].中国注册会计师,2018(05):81-83.

[20]翁坚克.非公允关联交易审计失败反思[J].财会通讯,2019(01):91-95.

[21]洪金明,刘洁筠.H公司隐性关联方交易审计案例研究[J].财务与会计,2019(04):33-35.

[22]张永娇.基于其他应收款证据的关联方交易舞弊研究——以天马轴承集团股份有限公司为例[J].财会通讯,2021(17):97-100.

[23]刘可童.上市公司关联方交易舞弊的审计案例分析——以舜天船舶为例[J].科技创新与生产力,2021(12):101-103+107.

[24]郑璇.关联方审计失败的原因及对策分析——基于2006-2020年证监会处罚决定书[J].中国注册会计师,2022(01):85-88.

[25]李烁,李清.上市公司会计舞弊风险指数的影响因素研究——基于关联交易视角[J].社会科学战线,2022(12):271-275.

[26]刘畅.隐性关联方交易舞弊审计案例分析[J].合作经济与科技,2023(10):159-161.

[27]徐新华,郑奕.关联方交易对审计质量影响的行业差异性分析[J].财会通讯,2017(15):14-17+129.

[28]李涛,王健俊.基于“舞弊双三角”理论的关联方交易舞弊审计研究——以乐视网为例[J].财会月刊,2018(17):92-100.

[29]刘旭.企业隐性关联方交易审计探讨[J].财会通讯,2019(19):95-99.

[30]文婧.关联方交易舞弊内部控制研究——以雅百特为例[J].财会通讯,2019(32):118-120.

[31]罗棪心,麻志明,伍利娜.关联交易方信息溢出效应对分析师的影响[J].会计研究,2020(03):46-53.

[32]王卉乔,林高怡,李艳.中国企业的海外关联交易与利润转移[J].财贸经济,2020,41(11):141-161.

[33]张羽翀.金融生态环境、关联方交易与审计风险[J].财会通讯,2021(01):60-63.

[34]程志刚.税收征管、关联交易与真实盈余管理[J].财会通讯,2021(19):71-75.

[35]刘云霞.上市公司控股股东关联交易型“隧道挖掘”行为研究[J].财会通讯,2021(22):113-116+152.

[36]詹细明,唐少清,李俊林.上市公司关联交易对审计质量的影响研究[J].中国软科学,2021(S1):429-437.

[37]马晨,敬舒贻.关联交易蕴含着会计错报风险么?——基于关联交易的错报动机分析[J].管理评论,2022,34(11):289-302.

[38]Sea Jin Chang, Jaebum Hong. Economic Performance of Group-Affiliated Companies in Korea: Intragroup Resource Sharing and Internal Business Transactions [J]. The Academy of Management Journal , 2000, (3): 429.448.

[39]Yan-Leung C S , Raghavendra R , Aris S .Tunneling, Propping, and Expropriation: Evidence from Connected Party Transactions in Hong Kong[J].SSRN Electronic Journal, 2004.

[40]Fooladi M , Farhadi M .Corporate governance and detrimental related party transactions: Evidence from Malaysia[J].Emerald Publishing Limited, 2019(2).

[41]Jian M., T. J. Wong. Propping and Tunneling through Related Party Transactions [R].Hong Kong: Hong Kong University of science and Technology working paper, 2006:70-105.

[42]Chen Y , Chen W , Clifton D J .The impact of related party transactions on the operational performance of listed companies in China[J].Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 2009, 12(4):285-297.

[43]Ming,JianT,J,et al.Propping through related party transactions[J].Review of Accounting Studies, 2010.

[44]Yeh Y H , Shu P G , Su Y H .Related-party transactions and corporate governance: The evidence from the Taiwan stock market[J].Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2012, 20(5):755-776.

[45]Yenpao Chen, Chien-Hsun Chen, Weiju Chen. The impact of related party transactionson the operational performance of listed companies in China [J]. Journal of EconomicPolicy Reform , 2009, 12(4): 285-297.

[46]Bologua G, Lindquist R. John Wiley. Fraud auditing and forensic accounting: new tools and techniques [J].The Accounting Review , 1996, 71(3): 433-434.

[47]Bowlin K O .Can strategic reasoning prompts improve auditors' sensitivity to fraud risk?[D].The University of Texas at Austin,2008.

[48]Abdullatif M .Fraud Risk Factors and Audit Programme Modifications: Evidence from Jordan[J].Australasian Accounting Business & Finance Journal, 2013, 7(1):59-77.

[49]Al-Dhamari R A , Al-Gamrh B , Ku Ismail K N I ,et al.Related party transactions and audit fees: the role of the internal audit function[J].Journal of Management & Governance, 2017.

[50]Abdul R P C , Hawaldar I T , Mallikarjunappa T .Related Party Transactions and Audit Risk[J].Social Science Electronic Publishing[2023-12-20].

[51]Clikeman P M , Liu A .AS 18: New Guidance for Auditing Related Party Transactions[J].Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 2017, 28(5).

[52]Jian M,Wong T J. Earnings management and tunneling through related party transactions: evidence from Chinese corpo-rate groups[R].Working paper,2003.

[53]Scanlon,Belliston.PCAOB Adopts New Auditing Standard for Related Party Transactions[J].The Corporate & Securities Law Advisor,2014:28-32.

中图分类号:

 F239    

开放日期:

 2024-05-21    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式