- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 小组合作学习对初中英语学困生影响的实验研究    

姓名:

 郑洁    

学号:

 20212105018    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 045108    

学科名称:

 教育学 - 教育 - 学科教学(英语)    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 教育硕士    

学位类型:

 专业学位    

学位年度:

 2023    

学校:

 石河子大学    

院系:

 外国语学院    

专业:

 学科教学(英语)     

研究方向:

 不区分研究方向    

第一导师姓名:

 刘凤峨    

第一导师单位:

 石河子大学外国语学院    

完成日期:

 2023-06-01    

答辩日期:

 2023-05-10    

外文题名:

 An Experimental Study on the Effect of Group Cooperative Learning on Students with English Learning Difficulties in Junior High School    

中文关键词:

 小组合作学习 ; 学困生 ; 学习自我效能感 ; 初中英语     

外文关键词:

 group cooperative learning ; students with leaning difficulties ; academic self-efficacy ; junior middle school English     

中文摘要:

教育公平始终是饱受关注的热议之一,要求在教育实践中面向全体学生。我国倡导的教育是素质教育,是面向全体学生的教育,强调在教育中每个个体都能得到发展。然而,在实际教育过程中,受客观性条件、人为性分层等因素的影响,学生之间接受的教育并不均衡,学困生往往处于被忽视状态,没有得到教师平等的关注与帮助。自合作学习理论引入我国后,研究者们将其应用于不同学习领域,探究其对不同学段的学习者的影响,小组合作学习的有效性已经得到验证。本研究将小组合作学习应用于初中英语的教学中,旨在关注小组合作学习对英语学困生的学业成绩与英语学习自我效能感的影响,以期为教师转化英语学困生提供思路,增加小组合作学习应用于英语学科中的研究案例。

本研究以多元智能理论和社会互赖理论为理论基础,以攀枝花市W中学初三年级两个平行班作为实验班与对照班,以班级中英语成绩长期处于及格线下、其他学科成绩排名远优于英语学科排名的两类学生作为研究对象,在两个班级中分别遴选出14名英语学困生。本研究运用教育实验法、学业成绩测验法、问卷调查法以及访谈法,开展了为期13周的教育实验,旨在探讨小组合作学习对初中英语学困生产生的影响,具体包含两个研究问题:第一,小组合作学习会对初中英语学困生的学业成绩产生何影响?第二,小组合作学习会对初中英语学困生的英语学习自我效能感产生何影响?

研究结果表明,初中英语学困生在经过小组合作学习后,发生了积极转变。第一,实验班中被试的英语学习成绩有明显提升。经过小组合作学习后,实验班中英语学困生的后测成绩较前测有显著性提升。相较于对照班,实验班中被试的后测成绩显著提高,同时实验班中被试两极分化程度不如对照班明显。因此,小组合作学习能够有效提高被试的英语学业成绩。第二,实验班中被试的英语学习自我效能感有明显提升。经过小组合作学习后,实验班中英语学困生的整体英语学习自我效能感及其两个子维度,即基本能力感与控制感得到明显提升。因此,小组合作学习能够有效提升学困生的英语学习自我效能感。

对于初中英语学困生的转化,本研究基于实验开展过程与研究主要发现,提出两点启示:第一,教师能够通过建立有积极相互依赖的合作小组,让学困生在学生群体中取得进步。第二,教师能够通过开展小组合作学习提高学困生的英语学习自我效能感。

外文摘要:

Educational equity has always been one of the hot topics that requires all the students enjoy equal rights in the process of education. The education advocated by our country is quality education, which is oriented towards all students and emphasizes that every individual can be developed in the process of education. However, in the actual process of education, due to the influence of objective conditions, artificial stratification and other factors, the education received by students is not balanced, and students with learning difficulties are often neglected and do not receive equal attention and help from teachers. Since the cooperative learning theory was introduced into China, researchers have applied it to different learning fields to explore its impact on learners in different academic stages, and the effectiveness of group cooperative learning has been verified. This study applies group cooperative learning to junior high school English teaching, aiming to focus on the impact of group cooperative learning on the academic performance and self-efficacy of students with English learning difficulties, so as to provide advice for teachers to transform students with English learning difficulties, and increase the research case of group cooperative learning in English subjects.

Based on the theory of multiple intelligence and the theory of social interdependence, this study took two parallel classes of Grade 9 of a junior high school in Panzhihua as the experimental class and the control class. The researcher selected 14 students with English learning difficulties from each class, whose English scores were below the passing line for a long time and whose scores of other subjects were far better than those of English subjects. This study carried out a 13-week educational experiment by means of educational experiment, academic achievement test , questionnaire survey and interview, aiming to explore the influence of group cooperative learning on junior high school students with English learning difficulties. Specifically, it includes two research questions: First, what is the effect of group cooperation learning on the academic performance of junior high school students with English learning difficulties? Second, what is the effect of group cooperation learning on English learning self-efficacy of junior high school students with English learning difficulties?

The results show that the students with English learning difficulties in junior high school have positive changes after group cooperative learning. First, the academic performance of the experimental class has been significantly improved. After group cooperation learning, compared with the pre-test, the post-test results of the students in experimental class have significantly improved. Compared with the control class, the post-test results of the experimental class are significantly improved, and the polarization degree of the experimental class is not as obvious as the control class. Therefore, group cooperative learning can effectively improve the English academic performance of the subjects. Second, the English learning self-efficacy of the experimental class has been significantly improved. After group cooperation learning, the overall English learning self-efficacy and its two sub-dimensions, namely, the sense of basic competence and the sense of control, of the research subjects in the experimental class are significantly improved. Therefore, group cooperative learning can effectively improve students' self-efficacy in English learning.

For the transformation of students with learning difficulties in junior high school, based on the process of the experiment and the main findings of the research, the implications of this study are as follows: first, teachers can help students with English learning difficulties make progress by establishing cooperative groups with positive interdependence; second, teachers can improve the self-efficacy of students with English learning difficulties through group cooperative learning.

参考文献:

[1]唐智松.教育原理:研究与教学[M].重庆:西南师范大学出版社,2016:55-59.

[2]教育部.义务教育英语新课程标准[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2022.

[3]林崇德.发展心理学第三版[M].北京:民教育出版社,2018:385.

[4]张大均.教育心理学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2015:149-151.

[5]钟启泉.差生心理与教育[M].上海:上海教育出版社,1994.

[6]沈烈敏.学业不良心理学研究[M].上海:上海教育出版社,2008:15-17.

[7]刘翔平.学习障碍儿童的心理与教育[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2010:26.

[8]王坦.合作学习的理念与实施[M].北京:中国人事出版社,2002:34-39.

[9]李洪元.后进生的心理特点与教育[M].北京:科学出版社,1987.

[10]钱在森.学习困难学生教育的理论与实践[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,1995.

[11]张玉明.新课程教师组织合作学习和创设教学情境能力培养与训练[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2003:56.

[12]杨小微.教育研究的原理与方法[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2002:160-161.

[13]北京市教育科学研究所.陈鹤琴教育文集(下卷)[M].北京:北京出版社,1985:441.

[14]庞国彬,刘俊卿.实用教育科研方法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2013:69-71.

[15]孟亚玲,魏继宗.教育科学研究方法[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2021:70.

[16]秦晓晴.外语教学研究中的定量数据分析[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2003.

[17]张玉明.新课程教师组织合作学习和创设教学情境能力培养与训练[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2003:63-64.

[18]林立,王之江.合作学习在英语教学中的应用[M].北京:首都师范大学出版社,2005:99-102.

[19]蔡笑岳.心理学(第三版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2014:91.

[20]孙晓雪.从分配正义到承认正义:学校内部公平的转向[J].当代教育科学,2022(02):10-16.

[21]王维,董永权,杨淼.合作学习对学生学习效果的影响——基于48项实验或准实验研究的元分析[J].上海教育科研,2020,(07):34-40+59.

[22]陈栩,郭斯萍.国外学习困难学生研究综述[J].教育科学研究,2006,(06):37-39.

[23]梁威.国内外学习障碍研究的探索[J].教育理论与实践,2007,(21):57-60.

[24]叶长文.苏霍姆林斯基的学生学习困难观及其启示[J].齐鲁学刊,2000,(03):28-31.

[25]上海市教育科学研究生初中学习困难学生教育研究课题组.学习困难学生发展的特点及学校教育的反思[J].上海教育科研,1992(05):5-8+61.

[26]杨帆.高中英语学困生成因及推进措施初探[J].继续教育研究,2008,(09):144-147.

[27]白新杰.多元智能理论视域下高职院校学困生转化策略探究[J].黑龙江高教研究,2021,39(02):105-110.

[28]曾凡碧.高中英语学困生问题分析与转化思考[J].中国教育学刊,2019,(S2):18-19.

[29]江知孜.浅谈英语"学困生"的成因及解决方法[J].西南大学学报(社会科学版),2011,37(S1):293-294.

[30]刘淑英.论教师的情感关爱对英语学困生的转化作用[J].黑龙江高教研究,2010,(04):129-131.

[31]覃德英,周桂香.在高职英语教学中增强学生的学习自我效能感[J].教育与职业,2011,(21):114-116.

[32]张国进,姚志强.中学生学业自我效能感的中介效应[J].赣南师范学院学报,2014,35(01):96-99.

[33]彭梓涵,王运武.基于混合学习模式的小组协作学习行为影响因素研究[J].黑龙江高教研究,2019,(06):141-147.

[34]边玉芳.学习自我效能感量表的编制[J].心理科学,2004(05):1218-1222.

[35]王昕,王非,姜昕.让教学管理促进合作学习的真实发生——兼评<合作学习教学策略与理论>[J].当代教育科学,2020,(05):93-96.

[36]潘洪建."学习共同体"相关概念辨析[J].教育科学研究,2013,(08):12-16.

[37]黄展.合作学习的现代德育意义[J].教育评论,2000,(03):31-33.

[38]万伟.从"合坐"走向合坐——综合实践活动课程中小组合作问题浅析[J].当代教育科学,2014(06):24-27.

[39]王坦.合作学习的理论基础简析[J].课程.教材.教法,2005,(01):30-35.

[40]王穗平,杨洁.洋为中用——小组合作学习法的移植应用[J].外语与外语教学,1995(5):35-37.

[41]陈晓东.合作学习对大学生成就动机影响的实验研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2012,20(3):446-448.

[42]王坦.合作学习的理论基础简析[J].课程·教材·教法,2005(1):30-35.

[43]张东兴,孙玉芳.浅谈小组合作学习的教学策略[J].教育实践与研究,2000 (9):10-11.

[44]丁际群.合作学习低效现象归因分析及对策[J].中国成人教育,2007 (9):126-127.

[45]闵仁理.小学教学中小组合作学习的问题与对策[J].现代教育科学,2007 (10):65-66.

[46]李帮魁.小组合作学习由边缘参与到核心参与[J].教学与管理,2019 (23):23-24.

[47]蒋波.试论合作学习的十大误区[J].教育导刊,2010(02):79-81.

[48]殷运峰,方蕾蕾.课堂教学中小组合作学习的误区及应对策略[J].当代教育科学,2019(04):29-32.

[49]何琳.关注小学英语合作学习中的"弱势群体"[J].教学与管理,2008,(33):146-147.

[50]蒋波,谭顶良.学优生、中等生和学困生:合作学习对谁更有效[J].教育理论与实践,2011,31(02):43-45.

[51]徐素珍.学习圈:农村小学合作学习的探究[J].上海教育科研,2019,(06):93-96.

[52]罗洁敏.英语课堂中小组教学初探[J].教育导刊,2006,(12):45-46.

[53]金良友.异质合作学习小组对学困生英语成绩的影响[J].教学与管理,2013(12):72-74.

[54]朱雪桢.高职英语阅读教学中的合作学习[J].教育评论,2008(05):101-103.

[55]郑淑贞,盛群力.社会互赖理论对合作学习设计的启示[J].教育学报,2010,6(06):34-40.

[56]郑淑贞.合作学习理论的新发展——基于社会互赖的视角[J].远程教育杂志,2009,17(04):29-34.

[57]钟启泉."学业不良"的界定及其因析模式述评[J].1994.华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),1994(02):69-77.

[58]黄秀晚.英语"学困生"情况分析及转化的对策[J].2008.广西民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008(S1):136-137.

[59]韩建全.多元智能理论在英语学困生转化中的应用研究[J].教育与职业,2010(06):87-88.

[60]王坦.合作学习述评[J].山东教育科研,1997(02):33-36.

[61]刘华.培育学习共同体:在共同学习中学会学习[J].中国教育学刊,2011 (05):43-45.

[62]许玲,温耀峰.英语教学中合作学习模式的探究[J].教学与管理,2011 (24):97-98.

[63]胡忠英.课堂合作学习模式研究[J].教学与管理,2005,(21):38-39.

[64]杨蕾.拼图式合作学习分组策略的实践研究[J].上海教育科研,2018,(10):78-81.

[65]王惠芬.关注学困生,凸显新课标的人文性[J].现代教育科学,2008,(04):58-59.

[66]王鉴,毛建梅.有效合作学习的教学策略研究[J].基础教育,2010(8):28-32.

[67]郑家福,江超.英语课堂教学中合作学习小组分组的问题及策略[J].教育理论与实践,2015,35(11):54-56.

[68]易红郡,黄蓝紫.测验法在中国的实验及评价[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2018,17(05):58-64.

[69]季春梅,赵慧.教师支持、学习自我效能感与中小学生学业成绩的关系:元分析结构方程模型[J].教师教育研究,2021,33(06):106-113.

[70]边玉芳.学习自我效能感:是一般的还是针对特殊领域的?[J].心理科学,2006(05):1275-1277+1253.

[71]张兰婷.合作学习小组的组建策略[J].教学与管理,2018(11):23-25.

[72]王鉴.合作学习的形式、实质与问题反思——关于合作学习的课堂志研究[J].课程.教材.教法,2004(08):30-36.

[73]曾琦.合作学习的基本要素[J].学科教育,2000(06):7-12.

[74]李超艺.高中生英语学习自我效能感与英语学业成绩的关系——以英语学习焦虑为中介变量[D].重庆:西南大学,2014.

[75]边玉芳.学习自我效能感量表的编制与应用[D].上海:华东师范大学,2003.

[76]Ellis,R.Understanding Second Language Acquisition[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,1989.

[77]Kirk S.A.Educating Exceptional Children[M].Boston:Houghton-Mifflin Company,1962:263-265.

[78]Jonhnson D W,Jonhnson R T,Holubec E J.Circles of Learning:Cooperation in the Classroom[M].Minnesota:Interaction Book Company,1993:17.

[79]Gardner.H.Frame of Mind:The Theory of Multiple Intelligence[M].New York:Basic Books,1983.

[80]Florentia,Loioua.Changes in teaching in order to help students with learning difficulties improve in Cypriot primary classes[J].Education 3-13,2016,44(4):371-390.

[81]Pui,Winnie Sin Wai.Differentiated Curriculum Design:Responding to the Individual and Group Needs of Students with Learning Difficulties with Self-regulated Learning Strategies[J].Support for Learning,2016,31(4):329-346.

[82]Baird,G.L.,Scott,W.D.,Dearing,E.,& Hamill,S.K.Cognitive Self-regulation in Youth with and Without Learning Disabilities:Academic self-efficacy,Theories of Intelligence,Learning vs.Performance Goal Preferences,and Effort Attributions[J].Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology,2009,28(7):881-908.

[83]Vera Yuli Erviana.Analysis Towards Factors of Students'Learning Difficulties at Muhammadiyah Elementary Schools In Sayegan Sub-District[J].In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Innovation (ICLI 2018),2018(3):221-227.

[84]Bandura A.Self-efficacy:toward a unifying theory of behavioral change[J].Psychological Review,1977,84(1):191-215.

[85]Dale H,Schunk.Self-Efficacy and Academic Motivation[J].Educational Psychologist,1991(26):3-4.

[86]Collins,J.L.Self-efficacy and Ability in Achievement Behavior[J].American Educational Research Association,1982(42):451-467.

[87]Zimmerman,B.J.& Bandura,A.& Martinez-Pons,M.Self-motivation for academic attainment:The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting[J].American Education Research Journal,1992(29):663-676.

[88]Bandura,A.& Schunk,D.H.Cultivating competence,Self-efficacy,and Intrinsic Interest Through Proximal Self-motivation[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1981,41(3):586-598.

[89]Printrich,P.R.&De Groot,E.X.Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance[J].Journal of Educational Psychology,1990(82):33-40.

[90]Ching,L,C.Strategy and Self-regulation Instruction as Contributors to Improving Students'Cognitive Model in an ESL Program[J].English for Specific Purposes,2002(42):451-467.

[91]Kim,D.H.Wang.C&Ahn,H.S.English Language Learners'Self-efficacy Profiles and Relationship with Self-regulated Learning Strategies[J].Learning&Individual Differences,2015(38):136-142.

[92]Slavin,R.E.Cooperative learning[J].Review of Educational Research,1980,50(5):315.

[93]Johnson,David W.,Johnson,Roger T.Making Cooperative Learning Work[J].Theory into Practice,1999(23):67-73.

[94]Johnson,D.W.&Johnson,R.Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory[C].Social Psychological Applications To Social Issues,1998(16):4.

[95]Johnson.D.W.&Johnson.R.T.Action research:Cooperative learning in the science classroom[J].Science and Children,1986,24(3):31-31.

[96]Alert Bandura E A L.Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2003,88(1):87-99.

中图分类号:

 G63    

开放日期:

 2023-05-31    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式