- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 小学第二学段数学问题链设计与教学的行动研究    

姓名:

 王慧茹    

学号:

 20222101032    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 045115    

学科名称:

 教育学 - 教育 - 小学教育    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 教育硕士    

学位类型:

 专业学位    

学位年度:

 2024    

学校:

 石河子大学    

院系:

 师范学院    

专业:

 小学教育    

研究方向:

 不区分研究方向    

第一导师姓名:

 韩瑞娟    

第一导师单位:

 石河子大学    

完成日期:

 2024-05-08    

答辩日期:

 2024-05-08    

外文题名:

 Action Research on the Design and Teaching of Mathematics Problem Chain in the Second Stage of Primary School    

中文关键词:

 问题链 ; 数学 ; 小学第二学段     

外文关键词:

 Problem Chain ; Mathematics ; Middle Grades of Primary School     

中文摘要:

随着新课程改革的深入,对小学生数学核心素养的关注达到了前所未有的高度。新课程标准也从问题解决角度阐述了问题在数学教学中的重要性。梳理文献发现,近年来问题链教学作为一种受到普遍认可的高效教学方式,引起了教育界的广泛关注,但是,传统课堂提问存在一定问题,如教学情境融入不足、提问频次较低、问题关联度差等,本研究基于实践观察和文献研究,以小学第二学段数学问题链设计和教学实践为研究对象,开展两轮行动研究,旨在发现当前问题链教学存在的问题、分析问题链教学设计基础、设计问题链教学过程并开展教学实践,以丰富问题链教学的研究资料,提升问题链教学的有效性。

研究主要采取行动研究的方式展开,通过录像分析法、访谈法、问卷调查法收集研究资料,构建行动框架,实施行动过程。研究构建了包括内容、时长和个数、类型、提问目的及情境来源五个维度的录像分析框架,对10节录像课进行了剖析;对8位教师进行访谈;对行动班级的学生进行数学测试和问卷调查,收集研究所需资料。

行动研究初期,通过录像分析、教师访谈可知,当前小学第二学段数学问题链教学存在问题设计缺少知识的横纵联系,情境创设能力不足,对思想与方法、原理的关注少,对提问目的的认识不恰当,缺少探究学习的空间等问题。基于以上问题,以“五何”问题设计理念为基础,设计问题链教学过程,开展行动研究。第一轮行动研究发现,课堂教学问题链设计缺少层次性、问题链类型单一,实际教学中过于等待预设答案,致使课堂环节衔接不足且课堂纪律混乱。改进行动过程并开展第二次行动研究,研究发现,在教学中将问题链教学与传统教学相结合,随着问题链层次性、类型丰富性的改进,学生参与度有所提升。但在教学中使用探究式策略,无法合理把控课堂时间,且忽视了内向性学生。对行动研究进行审思发现,学生的问题认同、参与度、理解、意识等均有所提升。

结合行动研究过程,从准备、提问与促进三个角度提出小学第二学段数学问题链教学设计与应用的具体改善策略。准备策略包括:确保问题情境的连贯性、动态设计问题链,作为问题链教学的先导保障。提问策略包括:给予学生合理的思考时间,提供深度思考的空间;引入开放性问题,促进学生思维开花;简洁合理地传达问题信息;采用巧妙的提问艺术,创造有价值的问题。作为问题链教学的保障。促进策略包括:拓展理答视角、及时审思问题链、打造教师教研共同体。

外文摘要:

With the deepening of the new curriculum reform, the focus on elementary school students' core literacy in mathematics has reached an unprecedented level. The new curriculum standard also elaborates the importance of problems in mathematics teaching from the perspective of problem solving. Combing through the literature, it is found that in recent years, problem chain teaching, as a generally recognized efficient teaching method, has attracted widespread attention in the education sector. However, there are certain problems with traditional classroom questioning, such as insufficient integration of teaching scenarios, low frequency of questioning, and poor correlation of questions, etc. Based on practical observation and literature research, this study takes the design and teaching practice of problem chain in mathematics in the second elementary school section as the research object and carries out two rounds of The purpose of the action research is to find out the current problems of problem chain teaching, analyze the basis of problem chain teaching design, design the process of problem chain teaching and carry out the teaching practice, so as to enrich the research materials of problem chain teaching and improve the effectiveness of problem chain teaching.

The research is mainly conducted in the way of action research, collecting research data through video analysis, interview method and questionnaire survey method, constructing action framework and implementing the process. The study constructed a video analysis framework that included five dimensions: content, length and number, type, purpose of questioning, and source of context, analyzed 10 video lessons, interviewed eight teachers, and conducted math tests and questionnaires for students in the action class to collect the necessary information.

At the early stage of the action research, it is known from the video analysis and teacher interviews that the current problem chain teaching of mathematics in the second period of elementary school has problems such as the lack of horizontal and vertical connection of knowledge in the problem design, the insufficient ability to create situations, the lack of attention to ideas and methods, principles, the inappropriate understanding of the purpose of questioning, and the lack of space for inquiry and learning. Based on the above problems, we designed the teaching process of question chain and carried out action research based on the concept of "Five He" question design. In the first round of action research, it was found that the design of the problem chain in classroom teaching lacked hierarchy, there was a single type of problem chain, and the actual teaching waited too much for the preset answers, which resulted in insufficient linkage in the classroom and disorganized classroom discipline. Improving the action process and carrying out the second action research, it was found that combining the question chain teaching with traditional teaching, with the improvement of the hierarchy and richness of the question chain, the degree of student participation increased. However, the use of inquiry-based strategies in instruction did not allow for reasonable control of classroom time and ignored introverted students. Reflection on the action research revealed that students' problem identification, engagement, understanding, and awareness improved.

Combined with the action research process, specific improvement strategies for the design and application of problem chain instruction in mathematics in the second elementary grade are proposed from three perspectives: preparation, questioning, and facilitation. The preparation strategy includes: ensuring the consistency of the problem situation and dynamically designing the problem chain as the precursor of problem chain teaching. Questioning strategies include: giving students a reasonable amount of time to think and providing space for in-depth thinking; introducing open-ended questions to promote the blossoming of students' thinking; conveying information about the problem in a concise and reasonable way; and adopting the art of skillful questioning to create valuable questions. As a guarantee of question chain teaching. Promoting strategies include: expanding the perspective of reasoning and answering, reviewing the question chain in a timely manner, and creating a community of teachers for teaching and research.

参考文献:

[1]布鲁姆等编.教育目标分类学·认知领域[M].罗黎辉等译.上海:华东师范大学出版社,1986:31.

[2]艾伦·C·奥恩斯坦,费良西斯·P.汉金斯著,柯森等译,课程:基础、原理和问题[M].南京:青江苏教育出版社,2002:120.

[3]G·波利亚.怎样解题[M].涂鸿,冯承天译.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2007:3-22.

[4]Beau Fly Sones,Claudette M·Rasmussen,Mary C·Moffitt著.范玮(译).问题解决的教与学——一种跨学科协作学习的方法[M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2004:39.

[5]涂荣豹,王光明,宁连华.新编数学教学论[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2006.

[6]唐恒钧,张维忠.数学问题链教学的理论与实践[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2021.

[7]Beau Fly Sones.范玮译.问题解决的教与学—一种跨学科协作学习的方法 [M].北京:中国轻工业出版社,2004:103-104.

[8]Ramos H.Creativity and systems thinking[M]. New York: Springer,2013:22.

[9]张奠宙,戴再平.中学数学问题集[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1996:96-97.

[10]戴维·乔纳森,简·豪兰,乔伊·摩尔,罗斯·马尔拉.学会用技术解决问题:一个建构主义者的视角(第二版)[M].北京:科学出版社,2007.

[11]钱珮玲,邵光华.数学思想方法与中学数学[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1999:22-26.

[12]刘华丽,高楠.数学思想与数学文化[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,2017:50.

[13]曹才翰,章建跃.数学教育心理学[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2006:101-103.

[14]李建华.21世纪的日本数学课程与评述[J].外国中小学教育,1999(03):26-29.

[15]顾泠沅,周卫.课堂教学的观察与研究——学会观察[J].上海教育,1999(5):14-18.

[16]叶立军,胡琴竹,斯海霞.录像分析背景下的代数课堂教学提问研究[J].数学教育学报,2010,19(03):32-34.

[17]李海峰.小学数学课堂中的提问应“量体裁衣”[J].教学与管理,2008(20):38-39.

[18]陈薇,沈书生.小学数学教学中深度问题的研究——基于专家教师课堂提问的案例分析[J].课程.教材.教法,2019,39(10):118-123.

[19]钱存平.数学课堂怎样提问最有效[J].教学与管理,2006(26):48-49.

[20]陈金飞.《九章算术》的主要内容及其教育价值[J].小学教学(数学版),2014(05):48-49.

[21]黄爱华.以“大问题”教学驱动深度学习[J].小学教学(数学版),2021(11):1.

[22]赵世恩,刘子钰.“问题导向”下促进深度学习的教学实践研究——以小学数学为例[J].课程.教材.教法,2023,43(01):131-137.

[23]张丹.“问题引领学习”:让儿童学习走向深入[J].中小学管理,2017(06):41-44.

[24]唐恒钧,张维忠,陈碧芬.基于深度理解的问题链教学[J].教育发展研究,2020,40(04):52-57.

[25]宋健健.小学数学教学中有效问题链的设计[J].教学与管理,2017(20):46-48.

[26]孙敬彬.“情境+问题串”教学实效最大化的策略[J].教学与管理,2017(02):46-49.

[27]唐恒钧,张维忠,陈碧芬.基于深度理解的问题链教学[J].教育发展研究,2020,40(04):52-57.

[28]丁福军,张维忠,唐恒钧.指向数学核心素养的问题链教学设计[J].教育科学研究,2021(09):62-66.

[29]郑燕,彭悦冬.深度学习视角下高中化学教学中问题设计的有效性分析[J].名师在线,2022(33):58-60.

[30]江炜炜.精心设计问题链,有效提高问题价值——例谈初中数学问题链的设计原则[J].中学数学研究(华南师范大学版),2019(24):24-25.

[31]刘鑫.高中数学教学中问题链的设计与实践研究[J].试题与研究,2021(25):72-74.

[32]吴健.“蝶式”问题串在初中数学教学中的应用探讨[J].数学教学通讯,2015(22):32-33.

[33]黄光荣.问题链方法与数学思维[J].数学教育学报,2003(02):35-37.

[34]王后雄.问题链的类型及教学功能——以化学教学为例[J]. 教育科学研究,2010,(05):50-54.

[35]赵玉玲.“问题链”教学法的探索与实践[J].现代教育,2012,Z1:88-89.

[36]韩红军,刘国庆,赵伟华.高中数学课堂教学中问题链的类型及结构模式[J].数学教学研究,2015,34(01):7-12.

[37]朱德全.数学问题系统的构建与解决程式[J].中国教育学刊,1999(05):41-44.

[38]王后雄.“问题链”的类型及教学功能——以化学教学为例[J].教育科学研究,2010(05):50-54.

[39]唐恒钧,黄辉.数学问题链教学设计与实施的三个关键[J].中学数学,2020(05):78-80.

[40]陈英勤.初中数学新授课中问题链的设计[J].数学教学通讯,2011(06):23-24.

[41]殷堰工.试论问题链在数学教学中的作用[J].中学数学月刊,2008(10):1-4.

[42]阎颐,李旭,张志宏.4MAT模式及其教育思想论析[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2006(02):132-135.

[43]胡小勇,祝智庭.教学问题设计研究:有效性与支架[J].中国电化教育,2005(10):49-53.

[44]栾兆辉.基于APOS理论的高中数学概念教学[J].教育观察,2023,12(35):107-109.

[45]吕传汉,汪秉彝.再论中小学“数学情境与提出问题”的数学学习[J].数学教育学报,2002,04:72-76.

[46]汪晓勤,邹佳晨,王华.数学史与留白创造式教学[J].数学通报,2023,62(03):1-6.

[47]崔易.转化思想在小学数学教学中的融入策略分析[J].小学生(中旬刊),2024(02):100-102.

[48]郑义富,黄甫全.数学的眼光:指向“三会”素养目标的数学抽象思想[J].数学教育学报,2024,33(01):59-63.

[49]程良宏,白珊.引向深度学习的课堂理答及其实践策略[J].课程.教材.教法,2023,43(04):67-74.

[50]王溪.基于“问题串”的小学数学复习课教学设计研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2022.

[51]马渝玲.指向深度理解的高中英语单元问题链教学设计研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2023.

[52]薛巧.基于问题链的高一化学教学设计研究[D].桂林:广西师范大学,2014.

[53]陈莹莹.问题串在小学数学教学中的应用研究[D].漳州:闽南师范大学,2021.

[54]尹莲.问题链在初三几何教学中的应用研究[D].昆明:云南师范大学,2018.

[55]李想.初中数学专家教师与新手教师问题链教学的比较研究[D].苏州:苏州大学,2016

[56]谢丽颖.基于数学核心素养的整数乘法教学研究[D].天津:天津师范大学,2022.

[57]Redfield D.L,Rousseau E.W.A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research on Teacher Questiing Behaor[J].Review of Educational Research,1981,51(2):23-24.

[58]Van Zee,E.H.&Minstrell,J.Using questioning to guide student thinking[J].The Journal of the Learning Sciences,1997,b6:229-271.

[59]C·Sune Maker.DISCOVER:Assessing and Developing Problem Solving[J].GiftedEducation International, 2001(15):232-251.

[60]中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育数学课程标准(2022)[S].北京师范大学出版社,2022:3;7-11; 22; 23;85.

中图分类号:

 G62    

开放日期:

 2024-05-16    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式