- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 白云山关键审计事项披露研究    

姓名:

 袁铃    

学号:

 20222116092    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 125700    

学科名称:

 管理学 - 审计    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 审计硕士    

学位类型:

 专业学位    

学位年度:

 2024    

学校:

 石河子大学    

院系:

 经济与管理学院    

专业:

 审计    

研究方向:

 不区分研究方向    

第一导师姓名:

 魏卉    

第一导师单位:

 石河子大学    

完成日期:

 2024-05-20    

答辩日期:

 2024-05-10    

外文题名:

 Research on the disclosure of key audit matters of BaiyunShan    

中文关键词:

 关键审计事项 ; 信息披露 ; 医药制造业     

外文关键词:

 Key audit matters ; Information disclosure ; Pharmaceutical manufacturing industry     

中文摘要:

审计报告作为财务报告中的关键组成部分能够帮助上市公司提高财务报告质量。2008 年金融危机过后,国外监管机构认为当前审计报告存在内容单一、信息含量不足等缺陷,始对现行审计报告 进行改革。为实现审计准则国际趋同以及更好地满足我国财务报告使用者的需求,2015 年中国注册 会计师协会开始修订和研讨新的审计报告准则。新审计准则要求下,注册会计师要在原有编制基础 上在审计报告中特别披露被审计单位的关键审计事项,直接提示财务报告使用者注意注册会计师认 为上市公司可能存在风险的领域。高质量的关键审计事项能够提高审计报告中的信息含量。但就当前关键审计事项披露的现有情况来看,上市公司所披露的关键审计事项更倾向于简单重复财务报表相关内容,存在同质化现象,难以满足投资者需求。医药制造行业的发展不仅与人类的生命健康息息相关,还关乎国民经济的稳定。百姓对自身健康的关注以及医药行业在国民经济中的重要性吸引了越来越多的投资者目光,他们对医药制造行业上市公司的财务报告有了更高的要求。

本文以白云山 2017 年至 2022 年关键审计事项的披露情况为研究重点,首先简单介绍整个医药制造行业的特点、历年审计情况以及关键审计事项披露的现状。其次深入研究白云山历年来关键审 计事项披露的基本情况,发现白云山关键审计事项披露存在披露数量不充分、披露形式可理解性较差、披露的关键审计事项集中度高增量信息较少以及关键审计事项审计应对程序模板化导致差异性小的问题。再次,针对上述问题,从事务所、审计师和监管机构三个层面展开分析,发现导致白云山关键审计事项披露存在问题的主要原因为:事务所延续以往审计风格、事务所内部审计质量控制体系不完善以及盈利性导向下激烈的行业竞争;审计师对新审计准则理解存在差异、“趋利避害”的天性导致审计师不愿意披露审计结果以及审计人员的能力和数量不足;政策制定者未明确关键审计事项披露的要求以及外部监管机构未实行有效监督。最后,依据前文研究内容提出完善关键审计事项披露的建议,包括:鼓励事务所向优秀同仁看齐适当调整审计风格、建立健全事务所内部质量控制体系以及搭建所内关键审计事项披露沟通平台;提升审计师提升专业胜任能力、通过建立风险基金制度等方式提升审计师风险承受能力以及直接要求审计师完善关键审计事项披露内容;建议政策制定部门完善准则内容、依据行业特征讲解典型案例,监管机构还应当建立健全奖励惩罚机制。

本文研究了白云山在披露关键审计事项过程中存在的问题,探究问题背后的原因,最后提出了完善关键审计事项披露的建议。希望能够提供更多案例成果,丰富现有的医药制造企业关键审计事项披露相关研究。与此同时,以期为相关监管机构提供改进工作的思路,加强监管力度,提升关键审计事项披露质量。

外文摘要:

The audit report, as a key component of financial reporting, plays an important role in improving the quality of financial reporting. After the financial crisis in 2008, foreign regulators began to reform the current audit report because of the defects of single content and insufficient information content. In order to achieve the convergence of China's auditing standards and international auditing standards, and better meet the needs of financial reporting users in China, the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants began to revise and discuss the new audit reporting standards in 2015. Under the requirements of the new audit standards, the CPA should, on the basis of the original preparation, specifically disclose the key audit matters of the audited entity in the front part of the audit report, and directly remind the users of the financial report to pay attention to the areas where the CPA believes that the listed company may have risks. High quality key audit matters can improve the information content of audit reports. However, in terms of the current disclosure of key audit matters, the key audit matters disclosed by listed companies are more inclined to simply repeat the relevant contents of financial statements, with homogenization, which is difficult to meet the needs of investors. The development of pharmaceutical manufacturing industry is not only closely related to human life and health, but also related to the stability of the national economy. The public's concern for their own health and the importance of the pharmaceutical industry in the national economy have attracted more and more investors' attention, who have higher requirements for the financial reports of listed pharmaceutical manufacturing companies.

This thesis focuses on the disclosure of key audit matters of Baiyunshan from 2017 to 2022. Firstly, it briefly introduces the characteristics of the entire pharmaceutical manufacturing industry, the audit situation over the years and the status quo of the disclosure of key audit matters. Secondly, through in-depth research on the basic disclosure of key audit matters in Baiyun Mountain over the years, it is found that the disclosure of key audit matters in Baiyun Mountain has problems such as insufficient disclosure quantity, poor understanding of disclosure forms, high concentration of disclosed key audit matters and less incremental information, and small differences caused by the template of audit response procedures for key audit matters. Thirdly, in view of the above problems, this thesis analyzes them from the three levels of firms, auditors and regulators, and finds that the main reasons leading to the problems in the disclosure of key audit matters of Baiyunshan are: the firm's continuation of the previous audit style, the imperfect internal audit quality control system of the firm and the fierce industry competition under the guidance of profitability; The differences in auditors' understanding of the new auditing standards, the nature of "seeking advantages and avoiding disadvantages" lead to auditors' reluctance to disclose audit results and the lack of auditors' ability and quantity; Policymakers have not clarified quantitative requirements for disclosure of key audit matters and external regulators have not exercised effective oversight. Finally, according to the previous research content, suggestions are put forward to improve the disclosure of key audit matters, including: encouraging firms to align with outstanding colleagues and adjust audit styles appropriately, establishing and improving the internal quality control system of firms, and building a communication platform for disclosure of key audit matters within the firm; Enhance auditors' professional competence, enhance auditors' risk tolerance by establishing risk fund system, and directly require auditors to improve the disclosure of key audit matters; It is suggested that policy-making departments improve the content of the guidelines and explain typical cases according to the characteristics of the industry, and regulators should also establish and improve reward and punishment mechanisms.

This thesis studies the problems and underlying reasons of Baiyunshan's disclosure of key audit matters, and ultimately proposes suggestions for improving the disclosure of key audit matters by Baiyunshan pharmaceutical manufacturing enterprises. I hope to provide more case studies to enrich the existing research on key audit disclosure in harmaceutical manufacturing enterprises. At the same time, it is expected to provide improvement ideas for relevant regulatory agencies, strengthen supervision, and improve the quality of disclosure of key audit matters.

参考文献:

[1]陈凤霞,郁静.关键审计事项披露的影响因素研究——基于 A+H 股上市公司的经验数据[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2023, 45 (07):160-171.

[2]陈丽红,易冰心,殷旻昊等.行业专家审计师会充分披露关键审计事项吗?[J].会计研究,2021,(02):164-175.

[3]陈丽红,周佳,张龙平等.非正式审计团队规模与关键审计事项披露[J].会计研究,2022,(11):139-154.

[4]邓英雯.关键审计事项研究:准则、理论与研究机会[J].国际商务财会,2021,(02):79-87.

[5]付强,廖益兴.审计独立性对关键审计事项披露的影响——客户重要性视角[J].审计与经济研究,2022,37(01):53-68.

[6]郭葆春,郭蓉.关键审计事项、公司内部治理与审计质量[J].中国注册会计师,2019,(07):50-56.

[7]黄亮华,汤晓燕.关键审计事项:审计师的“免责声明”?——企业真实活动盈余管理和关键审计事项披露的差异化[J].财经研究,2021,47(02):139-153.

[8]姜丽莎,李超凡,冯均科.新审计报告降低了债务融资成本吗?[J].审计研究,2020,(03):68-76.

[9]阚京华,曹淑颖.基于审计报告变革的关键审计事项披露影响因素研究[J].中国注册会计师,2018,(10):68-72+3.

[10]阚京华,陈秀梅.关键审计事项与企业融资成本相关性的实证研究[J].财会通讯,2020,(11):39-42.

[11]李凯丽,杨永淼.标准审计意见下关键审计事项对投资者决策的影响[J].中国农业会计,2021,(11):91-94.

[12]梁刚,曾旭.披露关键审计事项对审计质量的影响研究——基于 A 股上市公司的经验数据[J].会计之友,2019,(06):38-43.

[13]林皓若.关键审计事项披露个数的市场反应研究[J].全国流通经济,2021,(06):180-183.

[14]刘明辉,王扬.审计师特征、审计质量与审计师运营效率研究[J].审计与经济研究,2012,27(05): 20-33.

[15]刘圻,牛艺琳,张呈.关键审计事项准则实施能提高分析师预测准确性吗?[J].商业研究,2020,(04):121-131.

[16]刘颖斐,史佳睿,向珊等.审计师可以为交易所提供监管线索吗?——基于年报问询与关键审计事项关系的证据[J].审计研究,2023,(01):136-148.

[17]刘颖斐,张小虎.企业诉讼风险与审计收费——基于关键审计事项披露视角[J].审计与经济研究,2019,34(06):33-45.

[18]路军,张金丹.审计报告中关键审计事项披露的初步研究——来自 A+H 股上市公司的证据[J].会计研究,2018,(02):83-89.

[19]罗留阳.新审计报告准则下关键审计事项披露分析与建议[J].经济研究导刊,2020,(08):130-132.

[20]孟慧,徐回源.审计质量、关键审计事项与过度投资[J].科技创业月刊,2022,35(08):85-89.

[21]钱爱民,朱大鹏,郁智.上市公司被处罚会牵连未受罚审计师吗?[J].审计研究,2018,(03):63-70.

[22]施屹舟,范黎波.内部控制、盈余管理和管理者的在职消费[J].财经问题研究,2017,(07):88-94.

[23]孙龙渊,李晓慧,王彩等.共享审计师与“执业网络”的“传染效应”:基于关键审计事项的证据[J].会计研究,2021,(05): 162-174.

[24]王帆,邹梦琪.关键审计事项披露与企业投资效率——基于文本分析的经验证据[J].审计研究,2022,(03):69-79.

[25]王娟,苏红玉.债务违约风险、关键审计事项与审计收费[J].会计之友,2022,(03):106-113.

[26]王新华,王明伟.浅谈改进关键审计事项持续决策有用性[J].中国注册会计师,2022,(02):64-66.

[27]王旭东,程安林.关键审计事项段信息含量实证研究[J].中国注册会计师,2018,(10):51-55+3.

[28]王艳艳,许锐,王成龙等.关键审计事项段能够提高审计报告的沟通价值吗?[J].会计研究,2018,(06):86-93.

[29]吴秋生,独正元.A+H 股公司关键审计事项准则执行效果分析[J].会计之友,2018,(12):86-90.

[30]吴伟荣,李晶晶,包晓岚.制度背景、审计师特征与审计质量研究[J].科学决策,2017,(07):68-84.

[31]徐展,盛思思,顾奋玲.关键审计事项、风险感知与权益资本成本[J].金融经济学研究,2021,36(05):133-147.

[32]许静静,朱松,周萍.A 股关键审计事项全面披露特征及政策效果研究——基于 2018年首次全面披露的分析[J].审计与经济研究,2019,34(06):46-57.

[33]许奎,王帆,邹梦琪.关键审计事项、信息环境改善与企业投资效率[J].科学决策,2023,(05):1-23.

[34]许立志,王婷婷,赵芳.关键审计事项如何影响债务融资成本——基于会计稳健性的中介效应[J].财政监督,2022,(03):94-98.

[35]薛刚,王储,赵西卜.谁更关心关键审计事项:管理层还是分析师[J].审计研究,2020,(02):87-95.

[36]杨隽萍,邹超逸.关键审计事项、股权性质与权益资本成本——来自资产减值和收入确认事项的证据[J].中国注册会计师,2022,(04):26-33+3.

[37]耀友福,林恺.年报问询函影响关键审计事项判断吗?[J].审计研究,2020,(04):90-101.

[38]喻凯,余意.关键审计事项披露对企业会计稳健性影响研究[J].财会通讯,2021,(07):40-43.

[39]张继勋,蔡闫东,刘文欢.标准审计报告改进、管理层和审计人员的关系与管理层沟通意愿——一项实验证据[J].审计研究,2016,(03):77-83.

[40]张继勋,韩冬梅.标准审计报告改进与投资者感知的相关性、有用性及投资决策——一

项实验证据[J].审计研究,2014,(03):51-59.

[41]张金丹,路军,李连华.审计报告中披露关键审计事项信息有助于提高审计质量吗?——报表盈余和市场感知双维度的经验证据[J].会计研究,2019,(06):85-91.

[42]张瑞琛,林镇江,林榕娟等.关键审计事项披露现状分析与优化研究——以 HX 会计师事务所为例[J].会计之友,2020,(15):128-134.

[43]张婷,张敦力.审计师对舞弊的察觉影响其披露关键审计事项吗?[J].审计与经济研究,2023,38(01):31-39.

[44]张筱,王乾坤.客户和审计师不匹配关系对关键审计事项披露的影响[J].财会月刊,2023,44 (05): 94-101.

[45]张卓,蔡晓通,何春飞.关键审计事项披露会影响分析师预测准确度吗?[J].会计之友,2021,(22):100-107.

[46]张子健,李小林.A 股与 H 股市场对关键审计事项反应的比较研究[J].南京审计大学学报,2019,16(04):11-21.

[47]赵峰,廖雨寒.关键审计事项披露对公司融资效率的影响研究——基于新审计报告准则实施首年 A 股跨境投资公司数据[J].财经理论研究,2021,(04):70-83.

[48]赵刚,江雨佳,马杨等.新审计准则实施改善了资本市场信息环境吗?——基于分析师盈余预测准确性的研究[J].财经研究,2019,45(09) 114-126.

[49]赵玉洁,万贻健,方瑄.关键审计事项披露能否降低上市公司的股权融资成本?[J].审计研究,2020,(06):59-67.

[50]钟诗颖,郑石桥.公司特征对关键审计事项披露数量的影响研究[J].财会通讯,2020,(18):78-81.

[51]钟诗颖,郑石桥.审计师组合特征对关键审计事项披露数量影响研究[J].财会通讯,2020,(16):83-86.

[52]庄飞鹏,连敏.新审计报告的关键审计事项披露情况分析——基于2018—2020年沪深两市上市公司的统计数据[J].会计之友,2022,(02):136-143.

[53]Bedard J, Gonthier-Besacier N, Schatt A. Consequences of Expanded Audit Reports: Evidence from the Justifications of Assessments in France[J]. Auditing, 2019, 38(3):23-45.

[54]Brasel, Kelsey, Doxey, et al. Risk Disclosure Preceding Negative Outcomes:The Effects of Reporting Critical Audit Matters on Judgments of Auditor Liability[J]. Accounting Review, 2016, 91(5): 1345-1362.

[55]Gimbar C, Hansen B, Ozlanski M E. The Effects of Critical Audit Matter Paragraphs and Accounting Standard Precision on Auditor Liability[J]. Accounting Review,2016, 91(6): 1629-1646.

[56]Gutierrez E, Minutti-Meza M, Tatum K W, et al. Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor’s report in the United Kingdom[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2018, 16(5): 12-41.

[57]Modar Abdullatif and Ayat S. Al‐Rahahleh. Applying a new audit regulation: Reporting Key Audit Matters in Jordan[J]. International Journal of Auditing,2020, 24(2): 268-291.

[58]Qi Chen,Xu Jiang,Yun Zhang. The Effects of Audit Quality Disclosure on Audit Effort and Investment Efficiency[J]. The Accounting Review,2019,94(4).

[59]Reid L C, Carcello J V, Chan L, et al. Are Auditor and Audit Committee Report Changes Useful to Investors? Evidence from the United Kingdom[J].SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015, 28(11):15-42.

[60]Sierra-Garcia. L.N.cambetta,M.A GarciaBenau, and M.rta-Perez.Understanding the determinants of the magnitude of entity-level risk and account-level risk key audit matters:The case of the United Kingdom.The British Accounting Review.2019,51(3):227-240.

中图分类号:

 F239    

开放日期:

 2024-05-20    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式