- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 ST利源投融资期限错配的经济后果研究    

姓名:

 马萱    

学号:

 20192216198    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 1253    

学科名称:

 会计    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位类型:

 专业学位    

学位年度:

 2022    

学校:

 石河子大学    

院系:

 经济与管理学院    

专业:

 会计    

研究方向:

 财务理论与方法    

第一导师姓名:

 袁玲    

第一导师单位:

 石河子大学    

完成日期:

 2022-05-21    

答辩日期:

 2022-05-21    

外文题名:

 Research on the Economic Consequences of ST Liyuan Investment and Financing Term Mismatch    

中文关键词:

 投融资期限错配 ; 融资困境 ; 债务违约 ; 企业重组    

外文关键词:

 Investment and financing maturity mismatch ; Financing Dilemma ; Debt default ; Corporate Restructuring    

中文摘要:
<p> 在我国,企业的融资瓶颈成了制约公司进一步发展壮大的最主要阻碍。随着产业竞争加剧,公司需要扩大生产规模,抢占市场,进行大量研发与投资,因此需要大额资金支持。但是这些公司往往具有规模小,市场经营风险大,信用等级较低等特征,因此不具有长期融资的能力,难以获得长期资金。也因为企业内源性流动资金严重不足,融资渠道单一,取得银行借款难度大,政府扶持力度不足以及企业投资策略不完善等因素,迫使企业不得不选择投融资期限错配的方式。将短期借款用于长期投资,资金无法及时收回,企业就会很容易产生无法偿还债务和高额利息的现象,最终造成资金链断裂等财务问题,甚至出现企业重组或者倒闭,ST利源就是一个典型的案例。</p> <p> 本文将以ST利源为研究对象,首先阐述所选主题的背景及意义,回顾国内及国外专家的相关讨论,梳理研究思路。其次,介绍ST利源的投融资情况,确认企业存在投融资期限错配的现象,对其投融资错配的动因进行剖析,接着从直接经济后果和间接经济后果两个方面进行深入解读和评价,最后提出相关建议。</p> <p> 研究结果发现,ST利源选择投融资期限错配的主要原因是企业为了转型而盲目扩张、管理者过度自信、融资约束、以及市场萎缩引发财务流动性恶化。企业因为投融资期限错配造成偿债能力急剧下降;盲目扩张以及决策失误造成企业盈利能力变弱;整车项目大量投资造成企业营运能力降低。投融资期限错配使得企业前期进行大量筹资,而投资活动基本不能为企业带来现金流入,造成其现金流量结构不合理。与此同时,因为ST利源投融资期限错配造成企业形成大量债务违约,企业除了不能及时偿还债券本金及利息,还存在大额债务及民间借贷。最终融资期限错配致使企业重组,面临退市风险,还会造成企业融资约束加剧,审计风险提高。最后,针对ST利源投融资期限错配的问题提出相关建议,企业应改善企业融资约束,合理预算资金使用,完善融资决策体系以及完善高管管理制度。</p> <p> 期待本文的研究成果,能够给选择或将要选择投融资期限错配的企业带来参考和警示,也能督促中小企业治理体系日益完善,金融筹资环境更加宽松。</p>
外文摘要:
<p> In China, corporate finance bottlenecks turn out to be the most significant obstacle to the further development and growth of companies. As competition in the industry intensifies, companies need to expand their production scale, capture the market, conduct a lot of R&amp;D and investment, and therefore require large amounts of financial support. However, these companies are often characterised by their small size, high market operating risks and low credit ratings, and therefore do not have the ability to access long-term financing and find it difficult to obtain long-term funding. It is also because of the severe shortage of endogenous liquidity, the single source of financing, the difficulty in obtaining bank loans, the lack of government support and the imperfection of the company&#39;s investment strategy that companies are forced to choose a mismatch of investment and financing maturities. The use of short-term loans for long-term investments, which cannot be recovered in time, can easily lead to the inability to repay debts and high interest rates, eventually causing financial problems such as the breakage of the capital chain, or even the restructuring or collapse of the enterprise, and ST Liyuan is a typical case.</p> <p> This thesis&nbsp;will take ST Liyuan as the research object, firstly, it will explain the background and significance of the chosen topic, review the relevant discussions by domestic and foreign experts, and sort out the research ideas. Secondly, we will introduce the investment and financing situation of ST Leyuan, confirm the existence of investment and financing maturity mismatch, analyse the motives of its investment and financing mismatch, then conduct an in-depth interpretation and evaluation in terms of both direct and indirect economic consequences, and finally put forward relevant recommendations.</p> <p> The study found that the main reasons for ST Liyuan&#39;s choice of investment and financing maturity mismatch were blind expansion for transformation, overconfidence of managers, financing constraints, and deterioration of financial liquidity due to market contraction. The maturity mismatch caused a sharp decline in the company&#39;s solvency, a weakening of profitability due to blind expansion and poor decision-making, and a reduction in operating capacity due to heavy investment in vehicle projects. The mismatch of investment and financing terms caused the company to raise a large amount of funds in the early stage, while investment activities basically failed to bring in cash inflows, resulting in an unreasonable cash flow structure. At the same time, the mismatch in the maturity of ST Liyuan&#39;s investment and financing caused the company to default on a large amount of debt, and the company was unable to repay the principal and interest on the bonds in a timely manner, and also had large debts and private loans. Eventually, the mismatch in financing terms will lead to the restructuring of the company and the risk of delisting, and will also lead to increased financing constraints and higher audit risks. Finally, in view of the problem of ST Liyuan investment and financing period mismatch, relevant suggestions are put forward. Enterprises should improve enterprise financing constraints, rational use of budget funds, improve the financing decision-making system and improve the executive management system.</p> <p> It is expected that the findings of this thesis&nbsp;will serve as a reference and warning to companies that have chosen or will choose to mismatch the maturity of their investment and financing, and will also urge SMEs to improve their governance system and make the financial financing environment more relaxed.</p>
参考文献:

<p>

[1] 白云霞,邱穆青,李伟.投融资期限错配及其制度解释&mdash;&mdash;来自中美两国金融市场的比较[J].中国工业经济,2016,(07):23-39.</p>

<p>

[2] 陈志勇,毛晖,张佳希.地方政府性债务的期限错配:风险特征与形成机理[J].经济管理,2015(05):12-21.</p>

<p>

[3]巩潇娴.资产可抵押性、短贷长投与审计意见[J].财会通讯,2020(09):22-25+43.DOI:10.16144/j.cnki.issn1002-8072.2020.09.005.</p>

<p>

[4] 康进军,李欣,李娜.融资约束下营运资本管理与企业绩效关系检验[J].企业管理,2017(11):181-184.</p>

<p>

[5]康志勇.金融错配阻碍了中国本土企业创新吗?[J].研究与发展管理,2014,26(05):63-72.</p>

<p>

[6]赖黎,唐芸茜,夏晓兰,马永强.董事高管责任保险降低了企业风险吗?&mdash;&mdash;基于短贷长投和信贷获取的视角[J].管理世界,2019,35(10):160-171.</p>

<p>

[7] 李琳,连怡臻.企业融资约束、盈余管理与投融资期限错配[J].会计之友,2019(14):113-120.</p>

<p>

[8] 李玮玮, 石倩, 胡丹婷. 上市公司短融长投相关问题研究&mdash;&mdash;以浙江省为例[J]. 中外企业家, 2011, 24: 023.</p>

<p>

[9]刘孟晖,李晓庆,李志雪.企业投融资期限错配与审计师风险应对[J].财会月刊,2019 (18): 96 -105.</p>

<p>

[10] 陆岷峰,季子钊.关于企业期限错配的机理和财务危机的研究[J].西部金融,2017(02): 8- 15+20.</p>

<p>

[11]罗宏,贾秀彦,陈小运.审计师对短贷长投的信息识别&mdash;&mdash;基于审计意见的证据[J].审计研究,2018(06):65-72.</p>

<p>

[12] 马红,侯贵生,王元月.短贷长投对企业创新可持续性支持的实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2018(03):1-8.</p>

<p>

[13]马红,侯贵生,王元月.产融结合与我国企业投融资期限错配&mdash;&mdash;基于上市公司经验数据的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2018,21(03):46-53.</p>

<p>

[14] 马俊,侯建明,张惠.短贷长投、股权性质与公司业绩关系研究[J].技术与创新管理,2018 (01):124-128.</p>

<p>

[15]毛付根. 论营运资金管理的基本原理[J]. 会计研究,1995(01):38-40.</p>

<p>

[16]穆青,凡小梅. 传媒企业基于营运资本需求的流动性评价[J]. 现代传播(中国传媒大学学报),2018,40(03):130-134.</p>

<p>

[17]邱穆青,刘晨,王俊秋.企业投融资期限错配、审计风险与审计师决策[J].山西财经大学学报,2020,42(02):114-126.</p>

<p>

[18]沈红波,华凌昊,郎宁.地方国有企业的投融资期限错配:成因与治理[J].财贸经济,2019 (01): 70-82.</p>

<p>

[19]孙凤娥,苏宁,卢欣韵.激进策略、短贷长投与非理性短期借款[J].工业技术经济,2017, 36(09): 41-46.</p>

<p>

[20]孙凤娥.&ldquo;短贷长投&rdquo;缘何传染?&mdash;&mdash;基于行业同群效应的视角[J].南京审计大学学报,2021,18(03):81-91.</p>

<p>

[21]王百强,鲍睿,李馨子,牛煜皓.控股股东股权质押压力与企业短贷长投:基于质押价格的经验研究[J].会计研究,2021(07):85-98.</p>

<p>

[22]王丹. 营运资本管理政策对企业绩效的影响研究&mdash;&mdash;以零售业上市公司为例[J]. 经营与管理,2019(12):61-65.</p>

<p>

[23]王丽娜,庞亮,高绪亮.营运资本政策及其盈利能力的实证分析[J].财会通讯,2008,(04):113- 116.</p>

<p>

[24]王满,徐晨阳.金融错配下融资约束能抑制企业过度投资吗?[J].经济问题探索,2016 (09): 135-145.</p>

<p>

[25]王艳丽,杨帆.投融资期限错配、内外部环境异质性与公司业绩[J].会计之友, 2020(10): 63 - 70.</p>

<p>

[26]王竹泉,逄咏梅,孙建强. 国内外营运资金管理研究的回顾与展望[J]. 会计研究,2007(02): 85-90+92.</p>

<p>

[27]王竹泉,段丙蕾,王苑琢,陈冠霖.资本错配、资产专用性与公司价值&mdash;&mdash;基于营业活动重新分类的视角[J].中国工业经济,2017(03):120-138.</p>

<p>

[28] 吴娜,孙宇.货币政策与营运资本管理的相关性研究&mdash;基于钢铁行业的面板数据分析[J].会计之友,2013(08):67-72.</p>

<p>

[29]吴娜. 经济周期、融资约束与营运资本的动态协同选择[J]. 会计研究,2013(08):54-61+97.</p>

<p>

[30]肖俊斌,许倩丽.中小板制造业上市公司资本结构与公司绩效关系研究[J].财务与金融, 2015(01):71-79.</p>

<p>

[31] 徐尧,洪卫青,谢香兵.货币政策、投融资期限错配与企业绩效[J].经济经纬, 2017 (06): 135 - 141.</p>

<p>

[32]叶德珠,张智豪.经济政策不确定性与企业短贷长投&mdash;&mdash;基于中国上市公司的经验证据[J].制度经济学研究,2020(04):1-17.</p>

<p>

[33]叶康涛,曹丰,王化成.内部控制信息披露能够降低股价崩盘风险吗?[J].金融研究,2015 (2): 192~206.</p>

<p>

[34]易玄,刘诗若.地方政府债务与企业投融资期限错配[J].财会月刊,2020(12):34-42.DOI:10.19641/j.cnki.42-1290/f.2020.12.006.</p>

<p>

[35] 张先敏,王竹泉.基于精敏供应链的营运资本需求预测[J].财务与会计,2013(03):54-56.</p>

<p>

[36]张新民,叶志伟.得&ldquo;信&rdquo;者多助?&mdash;&mdash;社会信任能缓解企业短贷长投吗?[J].外国经济与管理,2021,43(01):44-57+72.DOI:10.16538/j.cnki.fem.20200816.201.</p>

<p>

[37] 钟凯,程小可,张伟华.货币政策适度水平与企业&ldquo;短贷长投&rdquo;之谜[J].管理世界, 2016, (03):87-114.</p>

<p>

[38]周霖,温锐,付志强.金融错配视角下小微企业融资解困误区及对策[J].当代财经,2017(01): 60-68+134-135.</p>

<p>

[39]Acharya V.V.,D.Gale and T.Yorulmazer.Rollover Risk and Market Freezes[J].The Journal of Finance, 2011, &nbsp;(66):1177-1209.</p>

<p>

[40]Campello,M.,E.Giambona,J.R.Graham,and C.R.Harvey.Liquidity management&nbsp;and&nbsp;&nbsp;corporate investment during a financial crisis[J].Review of Financial Studies.2011,&nbsp;&nbsp;24(6):1944-1 979.</p>

<p>

[41]Diamond D.W.Debt Maturity Structure and Liquidity Risk[J].The Quarterly Journal of Economics,&nbsp;1991,&nbsp;&nbsp;(l06):709-737.</p>

<p>

[42]Greg F,Thomas&nbsp;M K.An Analysis of Working Capital Management Results Across Industries[J].&nbsp;Mid-American Journal of Business,&nbsp;&nbsp;2005(11).</p>

<p>

[43]John&nbsp;Antanies. Recognising&nbsp;the&nbsp;Effects&nbsp;of&nbsp;Uncertainty&nbsp;to&nbsp;Achieve&nbsp;Working&nbsp;Capital Efficiency[J].Pulp&amp;Paper,&nbsp;2002, &nbsp;(7):56-57.</p>

<p>

[44] Mian Sajid Nazir,Talat Afza.Impact of Aggressive Working Capital Management Policy on Firms&rsquo; Profitability[J].The IUP Journal of Applied Finance,&nbsp;&nbsp;2009, (15):19-30.</p>

<p>

[45] Morris J R. On corporate debt maturity strategies[J]. Journal of Finance, 1976, (31):29-37.</p>

<p>

[46] Nihat Aktas.Is Working Capital Management Value Enhancing[M].Joumal of Corporate Finance, 2015, &nbsp;(30):98-113.</p>

<p>

[47] Van Horne JC,JM Wachowicz. Fundamentals of Financial Management[M].Prentice&nbsp;Hall Publishers,&nbsp;&nbsp;2004, &nbsp;(12):124-128.</p>

<p>

&nbsp;</p>

开放日期:

 2022-05-21    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式