- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

题名:

 基于DEL技术靶向DKK1 PPI小分子抑制剂的设计合成及抗TNBC活性评价    

作者:

 刘田利    

学号:

 20222115014    

保密级别:

 内部1年后开放    

语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 105500    

学科:

 医学 - 药学(可授医学、理学学位) - 药学    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 药学硕士    

学位类型:

 专业学位    

学位年度:

 2025    

学校:

 石河子大学    

院系:

 药学院    

专业:

 药学(专业学位)    

研究方向:

 药物化学    

导师姓名:

 王金辉    

导师单位:

 石河子大学    

完成日期:

 2025-05-17    

答辩日期:

 2025-05-18    

外文题名:

 Design, Synthesis and Evaluation of Anti-TNBC Activity of Small Molecule Inhibitors Targeting DKK1 Protein-Protein Interactions (PPI) Based on DNA-Encoded Library (DEL) Technology.    

关键词:

 三阴性乳腺癌 ; DKK1 ; DEL技术 ; 小分子抑制剂     

外文关键词:

 Triple-negative breast cancer ; DKK1 ; DEL  ; technology ; Small molecule inhibitor     

摘要:

目的:

三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)由于高度异质性,缺乏有效的治疗靶标,是临床的重大挑战。DKK1与TNBC的增殖、转移和微环境的调节密切相关,是潜在的新型治疗靶标。由于DKK1与LRP5/6复合体结合表面缺乏经典的小分子结合口袋,本研究拟运用DNA编码化合物库技术(DEL),设计合成一系列结构新颖的DKK1靶向小分子抑制剂,阐明其构效关系,最终获得亲和力高,成药性好的DKK1 PPI小分子抑制剂,为TNBC的治疗提供新的策略和潜在候选药物。

方法:

运用DNA编码化合物库技术,筛选与DKK1蛋白具有潜在亲和力的候选小分子,获得先导化合物。

采用基于结构的药物设计策略,对先导化合物进行结构优化,采用生物层干涉技术(BLI)和MTT法评估化合物与DKK1的结合常数及抗增殖活性,阐明构效关系。

利用分子对接预测优选化合物与DKK1的结合模式,验证其靶向性。

利用克隆形成实验、EdU实验、Ki67免疫荧光染色实验评价优选化合物对TNBC细胞的抗增殖能力。

利用划痕实验、Transwell实验、Snail免疫荧光染色实验评价优选化合物对TNBC细胞的抗迁移能力。

采用流式细胞术和蛋白免疫印迹实验评价优选化合物诱导TNBC细胞的凋亡能力。

结果:

利用DNA编码化合物库技术筛选得到38个与DKK1有亲和作用的小分子化合物,分别是16个苯并咪唑类、13个3-苯基丙酰胺类、9个多肽类。

根据分子对接结果,以苯并咪唑类为先导化合物进行结构优化,共合成120个衍生物,通过核磁共振氢谱、核磁共振碳谱和高分辨质谱表征其结构。

通过抗TNBC细胞活性筛选,发现化合物19g表现出最优的抗TNBC细胞增殖活性,其对BT-549细胞(IC50 = 2.77 µM)、MDA-MB-231细胞(IC50 = 3.41 µM)、MCF-7细胞(IC50 = 7.50 µM)、4T1细胞(IC50 = 3.81 µM)均表现出较强的抑制活性。

利用生物层干涉技术实验,测试化合物与DKK1蛋白分子的结合能力,发现化合物19g与DKK1蛋白有较强的结合能力,其与DKK1蛋白的平衡解离常数、结合速率常数、解离速率常数分别为:2.727 × 10-6 M、4177 M-1 s-1、1.139 × 10-2 s-1

分析120个化合物抗TNBC细胞增殖活性结果和与DKK1蛋白结合能力参数结果显示,发现苯并咪唑母核9位取代基为饱和含氮杂环时活性优于芳香杂环,酰胺N取代为饱和环烷基时优于链烷基,8位取代基为4'-甲基-[2,2'-联吡啶]-4基时对抗TNBC细胞增殖活性贡献显著,初步阐明构效关系。

分子对接结果显示,苯并咪唑母核与残基HIS204形成稳定的π-π堆叠作用,与残基LYS211形成π键。哌啶环、环丁基、4'-甲基-[2,2'-联吡啶]-4基分别与残基PRO212、残基ARG236、残基GLU185形成稳定的π键。且化合物19g的酰胺环丁基,苯并咪唑母核和乙基哌啶朝向DKK1蛋白内部空腔,占据了LRP6结合的位点,这是该类化合物显示较优活性的结构基础。从分子水平证实了其与DKK1蛋白较强的结合能力。

克隆形成实验、EdU实验、Ki67免疫荧光染色实验结果表明,化合物19g以浓度依赖的方式显著抑制TNBC细胞增殖。

划痕实验、Transwell实验、Snail免疫荧光染色实验结果表明,化合物19g以浓度依赖的方式显著抑制TNBC细胞迁移。

Annexin-V-PI双染色和蛋白免疫印迹实验结果表明,化合物19g以浓度依赖的方式诱导TNBC细胞的凋亡。

结论:

(1)综上所述,本研究利用DNA编码化合物库技术与分子对接筛选得到先导化合物,后基于结构的药物设计方法对先导化合物进行结构优化,设计合成了120个以苯并咪唑为母核的DKK1抑制剂。对化合物进行抗TNBC活性实验和与DKK1蛋白结合能力测试,筛选得到优化化合物19g,并初步阐明构效关系。分子对接结果表明,化合物19g通过与DKK1蛋白内部空腔结合发挥活性。体外药理实验表明,化合物19g对TNBC细胞具有显著的抗增殖、抗迁移及诱导凋亡作用。

(2)本研究为DKK1的PPI抑制剂治疗TNBC提供了候选药物和理论依据,具有重要的潜在应用价值。

外摘要要:

Objectives:

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) poses a significant clinical challenge due to its high heterogeneity and lack of effective therapeutic targets. DKK1 is closely associated with TNBC proliferation, metastasis and microenvironment regulation, representing a potential novel therapeutic target. Given that the DKK1-LRP5/6 binding interface lacks classical small-molecule binding pockets, this study will employ DNA-encoded library (DEL) technology to design and synthesize a series of novel DKK1-targeting small-molecule inhibitors. We aim to elucidate their structure-activity relationships and ultimately develop high-affinity, drug-like DKK1 PPI small-molecule inhibitors, providing new therapeutic strategies and potential drug candidates for TNBC treatment.

Methods:

Employ DNA-encoded library technology to screen candidate small molecules with potential affinity for DKK1 protein and identify lead compounds.

(2) Perform structure-based drug design to optimize lead compounds, using bio-layer interferometry (BLI) and MTT assays to evaluate binding constants to DKK1 and anti-proliferative activities, thereby elucidating structure-activity relationships.

(3) Utilize molecular docking to predict binding modes between optimized compounds and DKK1, validating target specificity.

(4) Assess anti-proliferative effects of selected compounds on TNBC cells through colony formation assays, EdU incorporation assays, and Ki67 immunofluorescence staining.

(5) Evaluate anti-migratory effects of selected compounds on TNBC cells using scratch wound healing assays, Transwell migration assays, and Snail immunofluorescence staining.

(6) Determine apoptosis-inducing capacity of selected compounds in TNBC cells by flow cytometry and Western blot analysis.

Results:

Using DNA-encoded library technology, we obtained 38 small-molecule compounds exhibiting binding affinity to DKK1, including 16 benzimidazole derivatives, 13 3-phenylpropanamides, and 9 peptide-based compounds.

Based on molecular docking results, we selected benzimidazole derivatives as lead compounds for structural optimization, synthesizing 120 derivatives whose structures were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and high-resolution mass spectrometry.

(3) Anti-TNBC activity screening revealed compound 19g exhibited optimal anti-proliferative effects against BT-549 (IC50 = 2.77 µM), MDA-MB-231 (IC50 = 3.41 µM), MCF-7 (IC50 = 7.50 µM), and 4T1 (IC50 = 3.81 µM) cells.

(4) Bio-layer interferometry demonstrated compound 19g showed strongest DKK1 binding with equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) = 2.727 × 10⁻⁶ M; association rate (ka) = 4177 M⁻¹s⁻¹; and dissociation rate (kdis) = 1.139 × 10⁻² s⁻¹.

(5) Analysis of the anti-TNBC cell proliferation activity results of 120 compounds and the parameter results of their binding ability to DKK1 protein revealed that when the substituent at position 9 of the benzimidazole core is a saturated nitrogen-containing heterocycle, the activity is superior to that of an aromatic heterocycle; when the N-substituent of the amide is a saturated cycloalkyl group, it is better than an alkyl chain; when the substituent at position 8 is 4'-methyl-[2,2'-bipyridin]-4-yl, it significantly contributes to the anti-TNBC cell proliferation activity. The structure-activity relationship was preliminarily elucidated.

(6) Molecular docking results showed that the benzimidazole core forms a stable π-π stacking interaction with residue HIS204 and a π bond with residue LYS211. The piperidine ring, cyclobutyl group, and 4'-methyl-[2,2'-bipyridin]-4-yl group form stable π bonds with residues PRO212, ARG236, and GLU185, respectively. Moreover, the cyclobutylamide, benzimidazole core, and ethylpiperidine of compound 19g face the internal cavity of the DKK1 protein and occupy the binding site of LRP6, which serves as the structural basis for the superior activity of this class of compounds. The strong binding ability of this class of compounds to the DKK1 protein was confirmed at the molecular level.

(7) The results of the colony formation assay, EdU assay, and Ki67 immunofluorescence staining assay demonstrated that compound 19g significantly inhibited the proliferation of TNBC cells in a concentration-dependent manner.

(8) The results of the scratch wound healing assay, Transwell assay, and Snail immunofluorescence staining assay demonstrated that compound 19g significantly inhibited the migration of TNBC cells in a concentration-dependent manner.

(9) The results of Annexin-V-PI double staining and Western blot assays indicated that compound 19g induced the apoptosis of TNBC cells in a concentration-dependent manner.

Conclusions:

In conclusion, in this study, lead compounds were screened out by utilizing the technology of DNA-encoded chemical library and molecular docking. Subsequently, based on the structure-based drug design approach, the lead compounds were structurally optimized. A total of 120 DKK1 inhibitors with benzimidazole as the core were designed and synthesized. Anti-TNBC activity experiments of these compounds and tests of their binding ability to DKK1 protein were carried out. The optimized compound 19g was screened out, and the structure-activity relationship was preliminarily elucidated. The molecular docking results indicated that compound 19g exerted its activity by binding to the internal cavity of the DKK1 protein. In vitro pharmacological experiments showed that compound 19g had significant anti-proliferative, anti-migratory, and apoptosis-inducing effects on TNBC cells.

This study provides a candidate drug and a theoretical basis for the treatment of TNBC with PPI inhibitors of DKK1, and it has important potential application value.

参考文献:

[1]Bou Z M, Ghorayeb T, Saliba F, et al. Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Updates on Classification and Treatment in 2021 [J]. Cancers (Basel), 2022, 14(5): 201-213.

[2]Gong Y, Ji P, Yang Y S, et al. Metabolic-Pathway-Based Subtyping of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Reveals Potential Therapeutic Targets [J]. Cell Metab, 2021, 33(1): 51-64.

[3]Wu S Z, Roden D L, Wang C, et al. Stromal cell diversity associated with immune evasion in human triple-negative breast cancer [J]. EMBO J, 2020, 39(19): e104063.

[4]Wein L, Loi S. Mechanisms of resistance of chemotherapy in early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) [J]. Breast, 2017, 34 Suppl 1: S27-S30.

[5]Harris E, Barry M, Kell M R. Meta-analysis to determine if surgical resection of the primary tumour in the setting of stage IV breast cancer impacts on survival [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2013, 20(9): 2828-2834.

[6]Zhang Y, Wang X. Targeting the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in cancer [J]. J Hematol Oncol, 2020, 13(1): 165-173.

[7]Kasoha M, Bohle R M, Seibold A, et al. Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1) protein expression in breast cancer with special reference to bone metastases [J]. Clin Exp Metastasis, 2018, 35(8): 763-775.

[8]Kasoha M, Steinbach A K, Bohle R M, et al. Dkk1 as a Prognostic Marker for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Breast Cancer Patients [J]. Cancers (Basel), 2024, 16(2): 214-221.

[9]Buller F, Mannocci L, Scheuermann J, et al. Drug discovery with DNA-encoded chemical libraries [J]. Bioconjug Chem, 2010, 21(9): 1571-1580.

[10]Jiang H, Zhang Z, Yu Y, et al. Drug Discovery of DKK1 Inhibitors [J]. Front Pharmacol, 2022, 13: 847387.

[11]秦涛, 马翠翠. 从小分子药物中探求药物研发新思路 [J]. 北京联合大学学报, 2011, 25(3): 63-66.

[12]Franzini R M, Neri D, Scheuermann J. DNA-encoded chemical libraries: advancing beyond conventional small-molecule libraries [J]. Acc Chem Res, 2014, 47(4): 1247-1255.

[13]Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R L, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3): 209-249.

[14]甘同舟, 袁空军, 颜丹虹, 等. 全球女性居民1990—2019年乳腺癌发病和死亡变化趋势及预测分析 [J]. 中国公共卫生, 2024, 40(07): 849-854.

[15]Lukasiewicz S, Czeczelewski M, Forma A, et al. Breast Cancer-Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification, Prognostic Markers, and Current Treatment Strategies-An Updated Review [J]. Cancers (Basel), 2021, 13(17): 157-168.

[16]Benitez F J, Morgan E, de Luna A A, et al. Global Stage Distribution of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J]. JAMA Oncol, 2024, 10(1): 71-78.

[17]Arnold M, Morgan E, Rumgay H, et al. Current and future burden of breast cancer: Global statistics for 2020 and 2040 [J]. Breast, 2022, 66: 15-23.

[18]Reis-Filho J S, Pusztai L. Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: classification, prognostication, and prediction [J]. Lancet, 2011, 378(9805): 1812-1823.

[19]Golubnitschaja O, Yeghiazaryan K, Abraham J A, et al. Breast cancer risk assessment: a non-invasive multiparametric approach to stratify patients by MMP-9 serum activity and RhoA expression patterns in circulating leucocytes [J]. Amino Acids, 2017, 49(2): 273-281.

[20]Sun L, Tian H, Ge H, et al. Cross-attention multi-branch CNN using DCE-MRI to classify breast cancer molecular subtypes [J]. Front Oncol, 2023, 13: 1107850.

[21]Maughan K L, Lutterbie M A, Ham P S. Treatment of breast cancer [J]. Am Fam Physician, 2010, 81(11): 1339-1346.

[22]Reis-Filho J S, Weigelt B, Fumagalli D, et al. Molecular profiling: moving away from tumor philately [J]. Sci Transl Med, 2010, 2(47): 47-43.

[23]Oliveira L, Amorim L C, Megid T, et al. Gene expression signatures in early breast cancer: Better together with clinicopathological features [J]. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2022, 175: 103708.

[24]Weigelt B, Baehner F L, Reis-Filho J S. The contribution of gene expression profiling to breast cancer classification, prognostication and prediction: a retrospective of the last decade [J]. J Pathol, 2010, 220(2): 263-280.

[25]Iwamoto T, Pusztai L. Predicting prognosis of breast cancer with gene signatures: are we lost in a sea of data? [J]. Genome Med, 2010, 2(11): 81-90.

[26]Tan P H, Ellis I, Allison K, et al. The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the breast [J]. Histopathology, 2020, 77(2): 78-86.

[27]Prat A, Cheang M C, Martin M, et al. Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor-positive tumor cells within immunohistochemically defined luminal A breast cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2013, 31(2): 203-209.

[28]Eroles P, Bosch A, Perez-Fidalgo J A, et al. Molecular biology in breast cancer: intrinsic subtypes and signaling pathways [J]. Cancer Treat Rev, 2012, 38(6): 698-707.

[29]Collins P M, Brennan M J, Elliott J A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for luminal a breast cancer: Factors predictive of histopathologic response and oncologic outcome [J]. Am J Surg, 2021, 222(2): 368-376.

[30]Ades F, Zardavas D, Bozovic-Spasojevic I, et al. Luminal B breast cancer: molecular characterization, clinical management, and future perspectives [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2014, 32(25): 2794-2803.

[31]Cheang M C, Chia S K, Voduc D, et al. Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer [J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2009, 101(10): 736-750.

[32]Raj-Kumar P K, Liu J, Hooke J A, et al. PCA-PAM50 improves consistency between breast cancer intrinsic and clinical subtyping reclassifying a subset of luminal A tumors as luminal B [J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 7956.

[33]张智伟, 骆颖波, 杨诗慧, 等. Ki-67表达水平与Luminal B型乳腺癌患者生存预后的关系 [J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2024, 39(16): 3140-3144.

[34]Lou X, Zhang J, Liu S, et al. The other side of the coin: the tumor-suppressive aspect of oncogenes and the oncogenic aspect of tumor-suppressive genes, such as those along the CCND-CDK4/6-RB axis [J]. Cell Cycle, 2014, 13(11): 1677-1693.

[35]孙运坡, 金秉巍, 应学翔, 等. Luminal B型乳腺癌不同亚型的临床病理特征及预后生存分析 [J]. 现代生物医学进展, 2022, 22(12): 2366-2371.

[36]Roberts S A, Lawrence M S, Klimczak L J, et al. An APOBEC cytidine deaminase mutagenesis pattern is widespread in human cancers [J]. Nat Genet, 2013, 45(9): 970-976.

[37]Ross J S, Slodkowska E A, Symmans W F, et al. The HER-2 receptor and breast cancer: ten years of targeted anti-HER-2 therapy and personalized medicine [J]. Oncologist, 2009, 14(4): 320-368.

[38]Sperinde J, Jin X, Banerjee J, et al. Quantitation of p95HER2 in paraffin sections by using a p95-specific antibody and correlation with outcome in a cohort of trastuzumab-treated breast cancer patients [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2010, 16(16): 4226-4235.

[39]Yoon J, Oh D Y. HER2-targeted therapies beyond breast cancer - an update [J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2024, 21(9): 675-700.

[40]Zagami P, Carey L A. Triple negative breast cancer: Pitfalls and progress [J]. NPJ Breast Cancer, 2022, 8(1): 95-108.

[41]Yin L, Duan J J, Bian X W, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtyping and treatment progress [J]. Breast Cancer Res, 2020, 22(1): 61-71.

[42]Newman L A, Reis-Filho J S, Morrow M, et al. The 2014 Society of Surgical Oncology Susan G. Komen for the Cure Symposium: triple-negative breast cancer [J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2015, 22(3): 874-882.

[43]Li Y, Zhang H, Merkher Y, et al. Recent advances in therapeutic strategies for triple-negative breast cancer [J]. J Hematol Oncol, 2022, 15(1): 121-130.

[44]Derakhshan F, Reis-Filho J S. Pathogenesis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer [J]. Annu Rev Pathol, 2022, 17: 181-204.

[45]Zhang G, Huang R, Zhao H, et al. ACAT1-mediated METTL3 acetylation inhibits cell migration and invasion in triple negative breast cancer [J]. Genes Immun, 2023, 24(2): 99-107.

[46]Plasilova M L, Hayse B, Killelea B K, et al. Features of triple-negative breast cancer: Analysis of 38,813 cases from the national cancer database [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016, 95(35): e4614.

[47]Nelson D R, Brown J, Morikawa A, et al. Breast cancer-specific mortality in early breast cancer as defined by high-risk clinical and pathologic characteristics [J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(2): e264637.

[48]Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard K I, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2007, 13(15 Pt 1): 4429-4434.

[49]Kast K, Link T, Friedrich K, et al. Impact of breast cancer subtypes and patterns of metastasis on outcome [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2015, 150(3): 621-629.

[50]Swain S M, Miles D, Kim S B, et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA): end-of-study results from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2020, 21(4): 519-530.

[51]Riggi N, Aguet M, Stamenkovic I. Cancer Metastasis: A Reappraisal of Its Underlying Mechanisms and Their Relevance to Treatment [J]. Annu Rev Pathol, 2018, 13: 117-140.

[52]Keihan S M, Emami F, Jeong J H, et al. Bio-Inspired and Smart Nanoparticles for Triple Negative Breast Cancer Microenvironment [J]. Pharmaceutics, 2021, 13(2): 87-94.

[53]Rouzier R, Perou C M, Symmans W F, et al. Breast cancer molecular subtypes respond differently to preoperative chemotherapy [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2005, 11(16): 5678-5685.

[54]Zhu Y, Zhu X, Tang C, et al. Progress and challenges of immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer [J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer, 2021, 1876(2): 188593.

[55]Obidiro O, Battogtokh G, Akala E O. Triple Negative Breast Cancer Treatment Options and Limitations: Future Outlook [J]. Pharmaceutics, 2023, 15(7): 108-115.

[56]Biswas T, Efird J T, Prasad S, et al. The survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and pCR among patients with advanced stage triple negative breast cancer [J]. Oncotarget, 2017, 8(68): 112712-112719.

[57]Mason S R, Willson M L, Egger S J, et al. Platinum chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer [J]. Breast, 2024, 75: 103712.

[58]Li S, Goins B, Hrycushko B A, et al. Feasibility of eradication of breast cancer cells remaining in postlumpectomy cavity and draining lymph nodes following intracavitary injection of radioactive immunoliposomes [J]. Mol Pharm, 2012, 9(9): 2513-2522.

[59]Di Leone A, Franco A, Zotta F, et al. Local Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Is Mastectomy Superior to Breast-Conserving Surgery? [J]. J Pers Med, 2023, 13(5): 116-123.

[60]中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会, 中华医学会肿瘤学分会乳腺肿瘤学组. 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2024年版) [J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2023, 33(12): 1092-1187.

[61]邵志敏. 乳腺癌保乳手术的进展与评述 [J]. 肿瘤防治研究, 2018, 45(05): 269-273.

[62]孙亚飞, 徐图, 陈超波. 三阴性乳腺癌治疗的研究进展 [J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2024, 27(09): 714-719.

[63]Wang X, Qi Y, Kong X, et al. Immunological therapy: A novel thriving area for triple-negative breast cancer treatment [J]. Cancer Lett, 2019, 442: 409-428.

[64]Michaels E, Chen N, Nanda R. The Role of Immunotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) [J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2024, 24(4): 263-270.

[65]Uliano J, Nicolo E, Corvaja C, et al. Combination immunotherapy strategies for triple-negative breast cancer: current progress and barriers within the pharmacological landscape [J]. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol, 2022, 15(12): 1399-1413.

[66]Fisusi F, Brandy N, Wu J, et al. Studies on polyethylene glycol-monoclonal antibody conjugates for fabrication of nanoparticles for biomedical applications [J]. J Nanosci Nanomed, 2020, 4(2): 1-9.

[67]Valencia G A, Rioja P, Morante Z, et al. Immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: A literature review and new advances [J]. World J Clin Oncol, 2022, 13(3): 219-236.

[68]Mantooth S M, Abdou Y, Saez-Ibanez A R, et al. Intratumoral delivery of immunotherapy to treat breast cancer: current development in clinical and preclinical studies [J]. Front Immunol, 2024, 15: 1385484.

[69]Li L, Zhang F, Liu Z, et al. Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Combination Strategies to Improve Outcome [J]. Cancers (Basel), 2023, 15(1): 89-96.

[70]Haffty B G, Yang Q, Reiss M, et al. Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2006, 24(36): 5652-5657.

[71]Fong P C, Boss D S, Yap T A, et al. Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers [J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361(2): 123-134.

[72]Geenen J, Linn S C, Beijnen J H, et al. PARP Inhibitors in the Treatment of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer [J]. Clin Pharmacokinet, 2018, 57(4): 427-437.

[73]Jamdade V S, Sethi N, Mundhe N A, et al. Therapeutic targets of triple-negative breast cancer: a review [J]. Br J Pharmacol, 2015, 172(17): 4228-4237.

[74]Corkery B, Crown J, Clynes M, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor as a potential therapeutic target in triple-negative breast cancer [J]. Ann Oncol, 2009, 20(5): 862-867.

[75]Cruciat C M, Niehrs C. Secreted and transmembrane wnt inhibitors and activators [J]. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2013, 5(3): a15081.

[76]Krupnik V E, Sharp J D, Jiang C, et al. Functional and structural diversity of the human Dickkopf gene family [J]. Gene, 1999, 238(2): 301-313.

[77]Zhu G, Song J, Chen W, et al. Expression and Role of Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1) in Tumors: From the Cells to the Patients [J]. Cancer Manag Res, 2021, 13: 659-675.

[78]McCarthy H S, Marshall M J. Dickkopf-1 as a potential therapeutic target in Paget's disease of bone [J]. Expert Opin Ther Targets, 2010, 14(2): 221-230.

[79]刘小兵, 黄桂林. DKK1 在乳腺癌中的表达及其临床意义的研究 [J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2018, 10(6): 79-86.

[80]Zhuang X, Zhang H, Li X, et al. Differential effects on lung and bone metastasis of breast cancer by Wnt signalling inhibitor DKK1 [J]. Nat Cell Biol, 2017, 19(10): 1274-1285.

[81]Lu R, Li Y, Xieyidai A, et al. Exploring the Role of DKK1 in the Occurrence of Lung Adenocarcinoma Based on the Analysis of Bioinformatics [J]. Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi, 2023, 26(8): 579-590.

[82]Elliott C, Rojo A I, Ribe E, et al. A role for APP in Wnt signalling links synapse loss with beta-amyloid production [J]. Transl Psychiatry, 2018, 8(1): 179-188.

[83]Yang R H, Qin J, Cao J L, et al. Dickkopf-1 drives tumor immune evasion by inducing PD-L1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Biochem Pharmacol, 2023, 208: 115378.

[84]Yao C Y, Gao Z X, Hou L L, et al. DKK1 promotes NUAK1 transcriptional expression through the activation Akt in hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Cell Biol Int, 2023, 47(2): 383-393.

[85]Shen Y, Xie Q, Wang Y, et al. Design, synthesis and anti-osteosarcoma activity study of novel pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives by inhibiting DKK1-Wnt/beta-catenin pathway [J]. Bioorg Chem, 2023, 141: 106848.

[86]Sakabe T, Azumi J, Umekita Y, et al. Expression of Cancer Stem Cell-associated DKK1 mRNA Serves as Prognostic Marker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma [J]. Anticancer Res, 2017, 37(9): 4881-4888.

[87]Fulciniti M, Tassone P, Hideshima T, et al. Anti-DKK1 mAb (BHQ880) as a potential therapeutic agent for multiple myeloma [J]. Blood, 2009, 114(2): 371-379.

[88]Goldstein S D, Trucco M, Bautista G W, et al. A monoclonal antibody against the Wnt signaling inhibitor dickkopf-1 inhibits osteosarcoma metastasis in a preclinical model [J]. Oncotarget, 2016, 7(16): 21114-21123.

[89]Leech S H, Olie R A, Gautschi O, et al. Induction of apoptosis in lung-cancer cells following bcl-xL anti-sense treatment [J]. Int J Cancer, 2000, 86(4): 570-576.

[90]Wang F S, Ko J Y, Lin C L, et al. Knocking down dickkopf-1 alleviates estrogen deficiency induction of bone loss. A histomorphological study in ovariectomized rats [J]. Bone, 2007, 40(2): 485-492.

[91]Eygeris Y, Gupta M, Kim J, et al. Chemistry of Lipid Nanoparticles for RNA Delivery [J]. Acc Chem Res, 2022, 55(1): 2-12.

[92]Klavdianou K, Liossis S N, Daoussis D. Dkk1: A key molecule in joint remodelling and fibrosis [J]. Mediterr J Rheumatol, 2017, 28(4): 174-182.

[93]Iozzi S, Remelli R, Lelli B, et al. Functional Characterization of a Small-Molecule Inhibitor of the DKK1-LRP6 Interaction [J]. ISRN Mol Biol, 2012, 2012: 823875.

[94]Thysiadis S, Katsamakas S, Mpousis S, et al. Design and synthesis of gallocyanine inhibitors of DKK1/LRP6 interactions for treatment of Alzheimer's disease [J]. Bioorg Chem, 2018, 80: 230-244.

[95]Betella I, Turbitt W J, Szul T, et al. Wnt signaling modulator DKK1 as an immunotherapeutic target in ovarian cancer [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2020, 157(3): 765-774.

[96]李小芳, 方萍萍, 徐沛. DNA 编码化合物库技术新进展及其在生物医药领域的应用与展望 [J]. 中国现代应用药学, 2023, 40(5): 712-720.

[97]Brenner S, Lerner R A. Encoded combinatorial chemistry [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1992, 89(12): 5381-5383.

[98]Xiong F, Yu M, Xu H, et al. Discovery of TIGIT inhibitors based on DEL and machine learning [J]. Front Chem, 2022, 10: 982539.

[99]Song Y, Li X. Evolution of the Selection Methods of DNA-Encoded Chemical Libraries [J]. Acc Chem Res, 2021, 54(17): 3491-3503.

[100]Cai B, Kim D, Akhand S, et al. Selection of DNA-Encoded Libraries to Protein Targets within and on Living Cells [J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2019, 141(43): 17057-17061.

[101]Petersen L K, Christensen A B, Andersen J, et al. Screening of DNA-Encoded Small Molecule Libraries inside a Living Cell [J]. J Am Chem Soc, 2021, 143(7): 2751-2756.

[102]Drews J. Drug discovery: a historical perspective [J]. Science, 2000, 287(5460): 1960-1964.

[103]王盈盈, 李晓敏, 蔡雅慧, 等. DNA编码分子库液相筛选方法的新进展 [J]. 高等学校化学学报, 2023, 44(03): 130-141.

[104]Krieger I V, Yalamanchili S, Dickson P, et al. Inhibitors of the Thioesterase Activity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Pks13 Discovered Using DNA-Encoded Chemical Library Screening [J]. ACS Infect Dis, 2024, 10(5): 1561-1575.

[105]Winssinger N, Harris J L. Microarray-based functional protein profiling using peptide nucleic acid-encoded libraries [J]. Expert Rev Proteomics, 2005, 2(6): 937-947.

[106]Belyanskaya S L, Ding Y, Callahan J F, et al. Discovering Drugs with DNA-Encoded Library Technology: From Concept to Clinic with an Inhibitor of Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase [J]. Chembiochem, 2017, 18(9): 837-842.

[107]Ding Y, Belyanskaya S, DeLorey J L, et al. Discovery of soluble epoxide hydrolase inhibitors through DNA-encoded library technology (ELT) [J]. Bioorg Med Chem, 2021, 41: 116216.

[108]Cuozzo J W, Clark M A, Keefe A D, et al. Novel Autotaxin Inhibitor for the Treatment of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Clinical Candidate Discovered Using DNA-Encoded Chemistry [J]. J Med Chem, 2020, 63(14): 7840-7856.

[109]武瑞君, 李玮琦, 杨阳, 等. 小分子药物筛选技术研究现状及其应用进展 [J]. 医药导报, 2024, 43(2): 255-261.

[110]Ganesan N, Mishra B, Felix L, et al. Antimicrobial Peptides and Small Molecules Targeting the Cell Membrane of Staphylococcus aureus [J]. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev, 2023, 87(2): e3722.

[111]Wang Y, Jeon H. 3D cell cultures toward quantitative high-throughput drug screening [J]. Trends Pharmacol Sci, 2022, 43(7): 569-581.

[112]Jaworski T. Control of neuronal excitability by GSK-3beta: Epilepsy and beyond [J]. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res, 2020, 1867(9): 118745.

中图分类号:

 R9    

开放日期:

 2026-05-30    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式