- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 人教版初中生物学新旧教材实验部分的比较研究    

姓名:

 杨丽君    

学号:

 20172106010    

学科代码:

 0401    

学科名称:

 教育学    

学生类型:

 硕士    

院系:

 生命科学学院    

专业:

 学科教学(生物)    

研究方向:

 不区分研究方向    

第一导师姓名:

 马淼    

第一导师单位:

 石河子大学生命科学学院    

完成日期:

 2019-06-06    

外文题名:

 A Comparative Study on the Experimental Part of the New and Old Textbooks for Junior Middle School Biology    

中文关键词:

  初中生物 ; 新旧教材 ; 实验教学 ; 比较研究    

外文关键词:

  Junior high school biology ; New and old textbooks ; Experimental teaching ; Comparative study    

中文摘要:

生物学作为一门以实验为基础的自然科学,实验教学活动的开展对学生知识、能力的提升以及情感的培养有着举足轻重的作用,且初中阶段学生实践探究能力的良好训练对以后的学习和发展有着积极的影响。在2011年生物学课程标准的指导下,2012年人教版初中生物学教材正式出版并在我国大部分地区使用。改编后的2012版生物学教材在实验教学方面与2001版教材相比存在诸多差异,部分实验内容进行了变动和改进,但2001版教材中的也有可供参考和借鉴的实验设计和方法。

本研究主要采用文献分析法、比较研究法和案例分析法,在相关的理论指导下,首先对2001版与2011版初中生物学课程标准进行对比分析。在此基础上,对人教版初中生物学2001版和2012版教材的实验部分从实验的整体编排与实验的具体内容方面展开了较为全面的分析,并结合生物课堂实验教学实践,选取新旧两版教材中具有代表性的实验案例进行个例的比较分析。得出以下结论:

在课程标准的比较方面,2011版课程标准在课程性质中增加了对生物科学性质的概述,课程理念上,新版课程标准在“倡导探究性学习”部分新增了对“科学探究”概念的界定,并在课程总目标中指出学生应初步形成生物学的创新意识,在课程具体目标方面,新版课程标准在能力目标中增设了学生需要具备一定的信息鉴别能力的新要求。在课程内容方面,新版课程标准针对具体内容的教学活动建议进行了更改和完善,使得活动的要求更加明确具体,可操作性更强。

在实验整体编排的比较方面,两版教材中均设置了丰富多样的实验栏目,2001版教材中的“进一步探究”和“角色扮演”活动,强调了学生对实验方法的迁移和灵活运用,以及在场景角色的体验中亲历实践的过程。2012版教材的“试一试”和“模拟实验”栏目,侧重学生通过不断尝试,提升探究能力和解决实际问题的经验与方法,并能在模拟实验的过程中通过对实验的模仿实现创新能力的培养。2001版教材中的实验总数为140个,相较于新版教材的120个而言,实验数量更加丰富。

在实验具体内容的比较方面,新旧两版教材中主要实验对象和材料用具的使用没有较大差异,新版教材的部分实验在原有实验材料的基础上进行了完善和改进。2001版教材在部分实验的安全教育及背景内容的陈述上相较于2012版教材而言更加完整,插图设计较为细致和具体,对学生的思考及操作有一定的启发作用。实验讨论则偏向于简洁、直接的方式,直指问题的核心,不利于学生对问题本质的理解和思维的发散。2012版教材中实验的语言陈述方式更为准确和专业化,能体现出实验内容设置上的严谨性,插图也更加的生动、清晰、规范、完善,对学生实验活动的开展有更好的指导价值,讨论题的阐述上更为详细、明晰,并多为提示性问题与开放式问题相结合的讨论形式。在对典型案例的分析中,以“非生物因素对生物的影响”为例,分析得出新版教材突出了实验对象选材的科学性和多样性,很好的锻炼学生的科学思维;旧版教材的进一步探究实验设计,更注重于学生对课堂上所掌握的科学探究能力的巩固和迁移运用。

最后分别从教材内容的编写以及教师实验教学的设计两个角度出发,提出了关于教材编写与开展实验教学的几点建议和策略。在教材内容的编写方面,实验内容的编写要符合学生的思维认知;实验选材要科学、合理;插图设置要形象、生动、规范;在实验内容中应注重安全教育和情感教育的渗透。在教师实验教学方面,应提升教师的实验专业技能;在开展课堂实验活动时,需结合学生的认知兴趣,设计合适的实验方案。

外文摘要:

Biology is a natural science based on experiments. The development of experimental teaching activities plays an important role in improving students' students' knowledge, ability and emotion. And good training in the practical exploration ability of junior high school students has a positive impact on future learning and development. Under the guidance of the biology curriculum standards in 2011, the 2012 People's Education Edition Middle School Biology Textbook was officially published and used in most parts of China. The revised version of the 2012 biology textbook has many differences in experimental teaching compared with the 2001 version of the textbook. Some experimental contents have been changed and improved. However, there are also experimental designs and methods available for reference in 2001 edition.

This study mainly adopts literature analysis, comparative research and case analysis. Under the guidance of relevant theories, firstly, it makes a comparative analysis of the 2001 and 2011 editions of junior middle school biology curriculum standards. On this basis, This paper makes a comprehensive analysis of the experimental parts of the 2001 and 2012 editions of Biology textbooks of the People's Education Press from the aspects of the overall arrangement and specific contents of the experiments, and combined with the experimental teaching practice of biology classroom, the representative experimental cases in the new and old textbooks are selected for comparative analysis. Concluded as follow:

In terms of the comparison of curriculum standards, the 2011 curriculum standards have added an overview of the nature of biological sciences in the nature of the curriculum. In the curriculum concept, the new curriculum standards have added a new definition of the concept of "scientific inquiry" in the section "advocating inquiry learning". In the general goal of the course, it is pointed out that students should initially form a sense of innovation in biology. In terms of the specific objectives of the course, the new curriculum standards add new requirements for students to have certain information identification capabilities in their ability goals. In terms of course content, the new curriculum standards have been revised and improved for specific content teaching activities, making the requirements of the activities more specific and operative.

In the comparison of the overall arrangement of the experiment, a variety of experimental columns were set in the two editions of the textbook. The “further exploration” and “role-playing” activities in the 2001 edition of the textbook emphasized the migration and flexible use of experimental methods by students. Experience the process of practice in the experience of the scene character. The "Trying" and "Simulation Experiment" columns of the 2012 edition of the textbook focus on the students' experience and methods of continually trying to improve their ability to explore and solve practical problems, and to realize the ability to innovate through the imitation of experiments in the process of simulation experiments. The total number of experiments in the 2001 textbook is 140, which is more abundant than the 120 in the new new textbooks.

In the comparison of the specific content of the experiment, the use of the main experimental objects and materials and tools in the new and old editions of the textbooks did not differ greatly. Some experiments of the new textbooks was improved on the basis of the original experimental materials. The 2001 version of the textbook is more complete in the safety education and background content of some experiments than the 2012 version of the textbook.The illustration design is more detailed and specific, which has certain enlightening effect on students' thinking

Biology is a natural science based on experiments. The development of experimental teaching activities plays an important role in improving students' students' knowledge, ability and emotion. And good training in the practical exploration ability of junior high school students has a positive impact on future learning and development. Under the guidance of the biology curriculum standards in 2011, the 2012 People's Education Edition Middle School Biology Textbook was officially published and used in most parts of China. The revised version of the 2012 biology textbook has many differences in experimental teaching compared with the 2001 version of the textbook. Some experimental contents have been changed and improved. However, there are also experimental designs and methods available for reference in 2001 edition.

This study mainly adopts literature analysis, comparative research and case analysis. Under the guidance of relevant theories, firstly, it makes a comparative analysis of the 2001 and 2011 editions of junior middle school biology curriculum standards. On this basis, This paper makes a comprehensive analysis of the experimental parts of the 2001 and 2012 editions of Biology textbooks of the People's Education Press from the aspects of the overall arrangement and specific contents of the experiments, and combined with the experimental teaching practice of biology classroom, the representative experimental cases in the new and old textbooks are selected for comparative analysis. Concluded as follow:

In terms of the comparison of curriculum standards, the 2011 curriculum standards have added an overview of the nature of biological sciences in the nature of the curriculum. In the curriculum concept, the new curriculum standards have added a new definition of the concept of "scientific inquiry" in the section "advocating inquiry learning". In the general goal of the course, it is pointed out that students should initially form a sense of innovation in biology. In terms of the specific

参考文献:

一、专著书籍

[1] 中华人民共和国教育部.全日制义务教育《生物课程标准(实验稿)》[S].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2001.

[2] 中华人民共和国教育部.《义务教育生物学课程标准(2011年版)》[S].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2011.

[3] 朱正威,赵占良.义务教育课程标准实验教科书七年级上[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2001.

[4] 朱正威,赵占良.义务教育课程标准实验教科书七年级下[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2001.

[5] 朱正威,赵占良.义务教育课程标准实验教科书八年级上[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2001.

[6] 朱正威,赵占良.义务教育课程标准实验教科书八年级下[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2002.

[7] 朱正威,赵占良.义务教育教科书七年级上[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2012.

[8] 朱正威,赵占良.义务教育教科书七年级下[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2012.

[9] 朱正威,赵占良.义务教育教科书八年级上[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2013.

[10] 朱正威,赵占良.义务教育教科书八年级下[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2013.

[11] 廖哲勋,田慧生.课程新论[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2003.

[12] 高孝传.课程目标研究[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2001.

二、期刊论文

[1] 李露红.初中生物实验教学改革策略探究[J].中学生物教学,2017,9(18):22-23.

[2] 胡思杰.如何提高生物实验教学质量[J].西部素质教育,2018,4(5):254.

[3] 代青,姜凤萍.中美高中生物教材生态学部分的比较研究[J].现代中小学教育,2016,32(6):119-123.

[4] 王小燕.高中生物新旧教材对比研究[J].科教文汇(中旬刊),2009,(2):29.

[5] 杨冬青.实验教学法在初中生物教学中的运用[J].西部素质教育,2017,3(12):226.

[6] 陈至.例谈训练学生思维的初中生物学实验教学策略[J].生物学教学,2018,43(7):33-34.

[7] 赵小艳,王威.浅谈提升初中生物学实验教学有效性的策略--以北师大版义务教育生物学七年级教科书为例[J].中学生物学,2015,31(8):36-38.

[8] 范峻驰.人教版与苏教版高中生物教材栏目设置的比较分析--以《稳态与环境》为例[J].中国校外教育,2014,(z1):600-602.

[9] 马新艳.试论实验教学法在初中生物教学中的运用[J].读与写,2017,14(11):109.

[10] 潘正军,邵红.人教版与苏教版高中生物教材特色之比较[J].南昌教育学院学报, 2016,31(2):104-107.

[11] 朱克让.中学生物学探究性活动教学策略研究[J].生物学教学,2014,39(9):4-6.

[12] 孙璟晗.“探究光对鼠妇分布的影响”的教学反思及改进[J].中学生物教学,2018,5(9):52-54.

[13] 陈思杭,杨涌.“探究影响鼠妇分布的环境因素”的实验教学[J].生物学通报,2014,49(2):25-27.

[14] 刘飞.苏教版初中生物实验教学评价模式探究[J].西部素质教育,2018,4(5):230.

[15] 叶春英.中美生物教材中“观察草履虫”的实验比较[J].华夏教师,2017,8(11):90.

三、硕博论文

[1] 高源.中德两国初中生物教材比较研究[D].武汉:华中师范大学,2014.

[2]边美英.中韩高中生物教材比较研究[D].大连:辽宁师范大学,2009.

[3]韩婧娴.高中生物教材“问题”栏目中情感态度价值观目标体现的比较研究[D].南京:南京师范大学,2017.

[4]周阳.新课标下五套普通高中生物教材知识体系的比较研究[D].南京:南京师范大学,2007.

[5]郝建仕.人教版和北师大版高中生物新教材中探究活动的比较研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2011.

[6]曹玲.高中生物教材(中图版)的特色与问题研究[D].济南:山东师范大学,2011.

[7]贾倩.人教版初中生物学教材(七年级)2012版和2001版的比较研究[D].天津:天津师范大学,2014.

[8]孙志宏.人教版生物学八年级上册新旧版教材对比[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古师范大学,2017.

[9]胡美珍.天津市初中生物实验教学现状调查及策略探讨[D].天津:天津师范大学,2015.

[10]赵健.三个版本初中生物新教材中实验部分的比较研究[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古师范大学,2016.

[11]朱虹.国内高中生物教材与美国教材生态学实验部分的比较[D].南京:南京师范大学,2014.

[12]周丽威.中日两国高中生物学教材的比较研究[D].杭州:浙江师范大学,2006.

[13]石双.高中数学人教版新旧教材的比较研究[D].贵阳:贵州师范大学,2014.

[14]许素真.人教版高中《生物》系列教材的比较研究[D].上海:华东师范大学,2006.

[15]李晓璐.中美两国初中生物学教材中实验部分的比较研究[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2016.

[16]高宏.2012版初中生物(七年级)三种教材的比较研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨师范大学,2016.

[17]王金刚.义务教育初中生物教材科学探究的比较研究

一、专著书籍

[1] 中华人民共和国教育部.全日制义务教育《生物课程标准(实验稿)》[S].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2001.

[2] 中华人民共和国教育部.《义务教育生物学课程标准(2011年版)》[S].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2011.

[3] 朱正威,赵占良.义务教育课程标准实验教科书七年级上[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2001.

[4] 朱正威,赵占良.义务教育课程标准实验教科书七年级下[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2001.

[5] 朱正威,赵占良.义务教育课程标准实验教科书八年级上[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2001.

[6] 朱正威,赵占良.义务教育课程标准实验教科书八年级下[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2002.

[7] 朱正威,赵占良.义务教育教科书七年级上[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2012.

[8] 朱正威,赵占良.义务教育教科书七年级下[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2012.

[9] 朱正威,赵占良.义务教育教科书八年级上[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2013.

[10] 朱正威,赵占良.义务教育教科书八年级下[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2013.

[11] 廖哲勋,田慧生.课程新论[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2003.

[12] 高孝传.课程目标研究[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2001.

二、期刊论文

[1] 李露红.初中生物实验教学改革策略探究[J].中学生物教学,2017,9(18):22-23.

[2] 胡思杰.如何提高生物实验教学质量[J].西部素质教育,2018,4(5):254.

[3] 代青,姜凤萍.中美高中生物教材生态学部分的比较研究[J].现代中小学教育,2016,32(6):119-123.

[4] 王小燕.高中生物新旧教材对比研究[J].科教文汇(中旬刊),2009,(2):29.

[5] 杨冬青.实验教学法在初中生物教学中的运用[J].西部素质教育,2017,3(12):226.

[6] 陈至.例谈训练学生思维的初中生物学实验教学策略[J].生物学教学,2018,43(7):33-34.

[7] 赵小艳,王威.浅谈提升初中生物学实验教学有效性的策略--以北师大版义务教育生物学七年级教科书为例[J].中学生物学,2015,31(8):36-38.

[8] 范峻驰.人教版与苏教版高中生物教材栏目设置的比较分析--以《稳态与环境》为例[J].中国校外教育,2014,(z1):600-602.

[9] 马新艳.试论实验教学法在初中生物教学中的运用[J].读与写,2017,14(11):109.

开放日期:

 2019-06-06    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式