| 中文题名: |
预处理对哈密瓜片红外干燥特性及品质的 影响研究
|
| 姓名: |
李义璨
|
| 学号: |
20202109079
|
| 保密级别: |
公开
|
| 论文语种: |
chi
|
| 学科代码: |
085501
|
| 学科名称: |
工学 - 机械 - 机械工程
|
| 学生类型: |
硕士
|
| 学位: |
机械硕士
|
| 学位类型: |
专业学位
|
| 学位年度: |
2023
|
| 学校: |
石河子大学
|
| 院系: |
机械电气工程学院
|
| 专业: |
机械
|
| 研究方向: |
机械工程
|
| 第一导师姓名: |
郑霞
|
| 第一导师单位: |
石河子大学
|
| 完成日期: |
2023-03-15
|
| 答辩日期: |
2023-05-12
|
| 外文题名: |
Effect of pretreatment on infrared drying characteristics and quality of Hami-melon slices
|
| 中文关键词: |
哈密瓜 ; 红外干燥 ; 预处理 ; 超声波 ; 品质
|
| 外文关键词: |
Hami-melon ; Infrared Drying ; Pretreatment ;   ; Ultrasonic ;   ; Quality
|
| 中文摘要: |
︿
哈密瓜是我国新疆地区的特色果品之一,口感脆爽、风味独特,深受消费者喜爱。但新鲜哈密瓜水分多、含糖量高,不易保存,同时运输等环节又易使果体受机械损伤造成腐烂损耗。将哈密瓜干制是解决上述问题的重要手段之一。本文为探究最适合哈密瓜片的干燥工艺,根据哈密瓜片干制加工技术的国内外研究现状,对比分析了四种典型的哈密瓜片干燥特性及其品质,为弥补单一干燥的不足,对比研究了三种常用的干燥预处理方式,研究结果表明将超声波应用至哈密瓜片红外干燥的预处理中,可以有效缩短干燥时间并保持较好的品质。本文在单因素试验的基础上,研究和优化了干燥工艺,为哈密瓜片干制加工的提质增效提供技术和理论参考。
主要研究内容和结论如下:
研究了不同干燥方法对哈密瓜片干燥特性及品质的影响。对比分析了冷冻干燥(FD)、红外干燥(IRD)、热风干燥(HAD)和微波真空干燥(MVD)对哈密瓜片干燥特性、色泽、质构、复水性以及微观组织结构的影响,得出FD、HAD耗时较长,IRD、MVD干燥速率快耗时短;干燥模型拟合结果显示,Wang and Singh模型适用于模拟FD、HAD干燥过程,Logarithmic模型适用于描述IRD过程的脱水规律,Page和Weibull模型适用于模拟MVD干燥过程;IRD产品综合品质好,各指标均优于MVD和HAD产品,FD产品品质最佳;微观结构观察结果显示,FD产品较好的保持了原有结构,IRD对产品的细胞损伤较小且具有一定的膨化作用,HAD、MVD较大的破坏了产品的内部结构。综上,IRD可在较短的时间内获得高品质的产品,综合评分最高,因此确定红外干燥为哈密瓜片的干燥方法。
研究了不同预处理对哈密瓜片红外干燥特性及品质的影响,对比分析了超声处理、烫漂处理、渗透处理对哈密瓜片红外干燥特性、色泽、质构、复水性以及微观组织结构的影响。超声处理能够加速物料内水分迁移,其干燥耗时最短,烫漂处理组耗时较对照组略有缩短,渗透处理组耗时最长且产品未能达到目标含水率;干燥模型拟合结果显示,Page、Weibull模型适用于描述哈密瓜片超声处理后IRD的脱水规律,Two-term模型适用于模拟哈密瓜片烫漂处理后IRD的干燥过程,Logarithmic和Two-term模型适用于描述哈密瓜片渗透处理后IRD干燥过程的水分比变化情况;超声处理组综合评分最高,超声处理能够有效改善哈密瓜红外干制品品质。综上,确定超声处理为哈密瓜片红外干燥的预处理方式。
为优化哈密瓜片超声处理红外干燥工艺,本文以超声处理时间、干燥温度、切片厚度为影响因素,以干燥时间、色差值和Vc含量为评价指标,进行了响应面法中的Box-Behnken中心组合设计试验研究。单因素试验结果表明,各影响因素对哈密瓜片红外干燥过程影响显著;建立了哈密瓜超声处理红外干燥的干燥时间、色差值、Vc含量与超声处理时间、干燥温度、切片厚度的回归模型,R2分别为0.999 8、0.999 4、0.999 9;各因素对干燥时间的影响从大到小依次为:切片厚度(X2)、干燥温度(X1)、超声处理时间(X3);对色差值的影响顺序为:X2>X1>X3;对Vc含量的影响顺序为:X2>X1>X3。优化后的工艺参数为干燥温度61 ℃、切片厚度6 mm、超声处理时间15 min。此时,干燥时间为115 min,色差值为13.79,Vc含量为112.1 mg/100 g。相较于未处理产品,干燥时间缩短45.24%,色差减小13.38%,Vc含量提高16.71%,微观结构对比结果显示超声波引起了哈密瓜片内部组织膨胀收缩,形成了细胞微通道,出现的多孔道结构,减少了水分迁移扩散的阻力。
﹀
|
| 外文摘要: |
︿
Hami-melon is one of the characteristic fruits in Xinjiang, China. It has crisp taste and unique flavor, and is deeply loved by consumers. However, fresh Hami-melon is rich in water and high in sugar, which is not easy to preserve. At the same time, transportation and other links are easy to cause mechanical damage to the fruit body and cause decay and loss. Drying Hami-melon is one of the important means to solve the above problems. In order to explore the most suitable drying technology for Hami-melon slices, according to the domestic and international research status of the drying technology of Hami-melon slices, the drying characteristics and quality of four typical Hami-melon slices were compared and analyzed. In order to make up for the deficiency of single drying, three commonly used drying pretreatment methods were compared and studied, It can effectively shorten drying time and maintain good quality. Based on the single factor experiment, the drying process was studied and optimized in this paper, which provided technical and theoretical reference for the quality and efficiency improvement of the dried Hami-melon slices.
The main research contents and conclusions are as follows:
The effects of different drying methods on the drying characteristics and quality of Hami-melon slices were studied. The effects of freeze drying (FD), infrared drying (IRD), hot air drying (HAD) and microwave vacuum drying (MVD) on the drying characteristics, color, texture, rehydration and microstructure of Hami-melon slices were compared and analyzed. It was concluded that FD and HAD took longer time, and IRD and MVD drying rate were faster and shorter; The drying model fitting results show that Wang and Singh model is suitable for simulating FD and HAD drying process, Logarithmic model is suitable for describing the dehydration law of IRD process, and Page and Weibull model is suitable for simulating MVD drying process; The comprehensive quality of IRD products is good, all indicators are better than MVD and HAD products, and the quality of FD products is the best; The microstructure observation results showed that FD products kept their original structure well, IRD had little damage to the cells of the products and had a certain swelling effect, and HAD and MVD had a large damage to the internal structure of the products. In conclusion, IRD can obtain high-quality products in a relatively short time, with the highest comprehensive score. Therefore, infrared drying was determined as the drying method for Hami-melon slices.
The effects of different pretreatments on the infrared drying characteristics and quality of Hami-melon slices were studied. The effects of ultrasonic treatment, blanching treatment and osmotic treatment on the infrared drying characteristics, color, texture, rehydration and microstructure of Hami-melon slices were compared and analyzed. Ultrasonic treatment can accelerate the water migration in the material, and its drying time is the shortest. The time of blanching treatment group is slightly shorter than that of the control group. The time of osmotic treatment group is the longest and the product fails to reach the target water content; The drying model fitting results showed that Page and Weibull models were suitable for describing the dehydration law of IRD after ultrasonic treatment of Hami-melon slices, Two-term models were suitable for simulating the drying process of IRD after blanching of Hami-melon slices, and Logarithmic and Two-term models were suitable for describing the change of water ratio in the drying process of IRD after osmotic treatment of Hami-melon slices; The ultrasonic treatment group has the highest comprehensive score, and ultrasonic treatment can effectively improve the quality of infrared dried Hami-melon products. In conclusion, ultrasonic treatment was determined as the pretreatment method for infrared drying of Hami-melon slices.
In order to optimize the infrared drying process of ultrasonic treatment of Hami-melon slices, this paper took the ultrasonic treatment time, drying temperature and slice thickness as the influencing factors, and the drying time, color difference value and VC content as the evaluation indexes, and carried out the experimental study of Box-Behnken center combination design in response surface method. The results of single factor test showed that each factor had a significant effect on the infrared drying process of Hami-melon slices; The regression models of drying time, color difference value, VC content and ultrasonic treatment time, drying temperature and slice thickness of ultrasonic treatment infrared drying of Hami-melon were established. R2 was 0.999 8, 0.999 4 and 0.999 9, respectively; The effects of various factors on drying time are as follows: slice thickness (X2), drying temperature (X1), ultrasonic treatment time (X3); The order of influence on color difference value is: X2>X1>X3; The order of influence on VC content is X2>X1>X3. The optimized process parameters are drying temperature 61 ℃, slice thickness 6 mm and ultrasonic treatment time 15 min. At this time, the drying time is 115 min, the color difference value is 13.79, and the VC content is 112.1 mg/100 g. Compared with untreated products, the drying time is reduced by 45.24%, the color difference is reduced by 13.38%, and the VC content is increased by 16.71%. The microstructure comparison results show that ultrasound causes the expansion and contraction of the internal tissue of Hami-melon slices, forming cell microchannels, and the appearance of porous channel structure, reducing the resistance of water migration and diffusion.
﹀
|
| 参考文献: |
︿
[1]廖新福,刘曼双.新疆哈密瓜产业现状及发展对策[J].新疆农业科技,2011(03): 1-2. [2]李小霞,马本学,王文霞,等.哈密瓜在线检测输送翻转装置的设计与试验[J].机械设计与制造,2021(01):20-23. [3]新疆维吾尔自治区统计局.新疆统计年鉴2020[M].北京,中国统计出版社,2020. [4]常安太,郑霞,肖红伟,等.哈密瓜干燥技术现状与装备研究展望[J].包装与食品机械,2020,38(06):61-67. [5]郑霞, 肖红伟, 王丽红, 等. 红外联合气体射流冲击方法缩短哈密瓜片的干燥时间[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(1): 262-269. [6]Chang Antai, Zheng Xia, Xiao Hongwei, et al. Short- and Medium-Wave Infrared Drying of Cantaloupe (Cucumis melon L.) Slices: Drying Kinetics and Process Parameter Optimization[J]. Processes, 2022, 10(1). [7]Deng L Z, Arun S. Mujumdar, Zhang Q, et al. Chemical and physical pretreatments of fruits and vegetables: Effects on drying characteristics and quality attributes-a comprehensive review[J]. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2017, 1-25. [8]贾文婷,杨慧,吴洪斌,等.不同预处理方式对新疆地区哈密瓜变温压差膨化干燥的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2016,44(04):338-340. [9]金听祥,王广红,彭钰航,等.不同预处理方式对胡萝卜热泵干燥品质的影响[J].食品与发酵工业,2022,48(07):173-178. [10]戴澄. 超声波辅助预处理及冷冻对冻干胡萝卜影响的研究[D].上海理工大学,2016. [11]马有川.预处理对苹果脆片真空冷冻干燥特性和品质的影响研究[D].中国农业科学院,2021. [12]孟繁博,黄道梅,郑秀艳,等.超声波预处理对热风干燥火龙果片品质的影响[J].食品与发酵工业,2021,47(13):205-209. [13]徐汝祯.预处理对热风和射频真空干燥的猕猴桃切片品质的影响研究[D].西北农林科技大学,2020. [14]苑丽婧,何秀,林蓉,等.超声预处理对猕猴桃水分状态及热风干燥特性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(13):263-272. [15]文怀兴,高举,俞祖俊.真空低温干燥工艺参数对红枣切片品质的影响[J].食品工业,2016,37(11) :107-110. [16]高静静,冯作山,白羽嘉.真空冷冻和热风干燥对哈密瓜片品质的影响[J].保鲜与加工,2020,20(03):78-84. [17]赵艳雪,余金橙,刘士琪,等.山楂切片冷冻干燥动力学与品质特性研究[J].食品研究与开发,2021,42(02):53-60. [18]陈佳楠.菠萝切片真空冷冻干燥工艺研究及优化[D].天津商业大学,2022. [19]QUISPE-FUENTES I, VEGA-GÁLVEZA A and ARANDA M, 2018. Evaluation of phenolic profiles and antioxidant capacity of maqui (Aristotelia chilensis) berries and their relationships to drying method[J]. Journal Science of Food Agriculture, 98(11): 4168-4176. [20]万江静,郑霞,高振江,等. 红枣片远红外辐射干燥的干燥特性及Vc变化[J]. 食品工业科技,2016,36(8) :110-115. [21]武华文.哈密瓜片远红外干燥特性及品质工艺试验研究[D].塔里木大学,2020. [22]Chen Q Q, Song H H, Bi J F, Chen R J, Liu X, Wu X Y, Hou H N. Multi-Objective Optimization and Quality Evaluation of Short- and Medium-Wave Infrared Radiation Dried Carrot Slices[J]. International Journal of Food Engineering, 2019, 15(8). [23]Shi X W, Liu Y H, Li Z Y, et al. Effects of radiation temperature on dehydration and moisture migration in banana slices during far‐infrared radiation drying[J]. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 2020, 44(11): 1-11. [24]郑霞.基于不同干燥技术的红枣泥片干燥特性及品质研究[D].中国农业大学,2015. [25]常安太.哈密瓜片红外热风联合干燥动力学及工艺参数优化[D].石河子大学,2022. [26]张雪波,刘显茜,邹三全,等.哈密瓜切片热风干燥特性及数学模型[J].食品与机械,2022,38(02):130-136+142. [27]王莹,吴立国,孙丽萍,等.基于Weibull函数的平贝母热风干燥特性[J].农机化研究,2022,44(05):249-254. [28]MICHALSK A, WOJDYŁO A, LECH K, GRZEGORZ P Ł and FIGIEL A, 2017. Effect of different drying techniques on physical properties, total polyphenols and antioxidant capacity of blackcurrant pomace powders. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 41(9): 114-121. [29]刘德成. 冷冻-红外分段组合干燥红枣片干燥特性及品质研究[D].石河子大学,2022. [30]金敬红,范小东,陈文华,等.不同预处理方式对微波干燥哈密瓜品质的影响[J].中国野生植物资源,2020,39(04):32-35. [31]王亚娟,张凤娟,滕建文,等.胡萝卜片微波真空干燥动力学数值拟合[J].食品工业科技,2020,41(18):17-23. [32]Magdalena Zielinska, Danuta Zielinska. Effects of freezing, convective and microwave-vacuum drying on the content of bioactive compounds and color of cranberries[J]. LWT, 2019, 104: 202-209. [33]Zhao Y T, Gao R, Zhuang W J, et al. Combined single-stage tempering and microwave vacuum drying of the edible mushroom Agrocybe chaxingu: Effects on drying characteristics and physical-chemical qualities[J]. Lwt-Food Science and Technology, 2020, 128: 109372. [34]郝启栋,乔旭光,郑振佳,等.超高压和超声波预处理对蒜片热风干燥过程及品质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(03):278-286. [35]魏明,张倩,钱森和,等.不同预处理对铁皮石斛热风干燥特性及品质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(08):281-287. [36]索浩然.超声波预处理对铁皮石斛干燥特性及品质的影响[D].安徽工程大学,2020. [37]张振亚,韩琭丛,金听祥,等.超声预处理对热泵干燥菠萝品质的影响[J].食品与发酵工业,2022,48(12):111-116. [38]周頔,孙艳辉,蔡华珍,等.超声波预处理对苹果片真空冷冻干燥过程的影响[J].食品工业科技,2015,36(22):282-286. [39]陈文敏,彭星星,马婷,等.超声处理对中短波红外干燥红枣时间及品质的影响[J].食品科学,2015,36(08):74-80. [40]Ren Z Y, Bai Y X. Ultrasound Pretreatment of Apple Slice Prior to Vacuum Freeze Drying[C]. 2nd International Conference on Material Science, Energy and Environmental Engineering, 2018, 112-117. [41]ERHAN H, HAWAR JJ, MEDENI M. Ultrasonication as pretreatment for drying of tomato slices in a hot air-microwave hybrid oven [J]. Drying Technology, 2017, 35(7): 849-859. [42]任旭,谢蔓莉,叶发银,等.烫漂方式对苹果脆片褐变和多酚及其抗氧化活性的影响[J].食品与发酵工业,2022,48(01):161-168. [43]王怡,董继先,王栋,等.微波烫漂预处理下百合热风干燥特性及动力学模拟[J].食品工业科技,2021,42(03):186-190+200. [44]张迎敏,任广跃,屈展平,等.超声和烫漂预处理对红薯叶热风干燥的影响[J].食品与机械,2019,35(12):194-201. [45]Ren,F.Y, Perussello,C.A., Zhang,Z.H, et al. Enhancement of phytochemical content and drying efficiency of onions (Allium cepa L.) through blanching[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,98(4):1300-1309. [46]Liu J, Wang R, Wang X, et al. 2019b. Effect of blanching and drying temperatures on the browning-related enzymes and physicochemical properties of lily bulb flours[J]. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 43(12): e14248. [47]宋璐瑶.芒果真空预处理联合超声辅助渗透脱水及水分迁移规律的研究[D].浙江大学,2021. [48]Derossi, A., Severini, C., Del Mastro, A., De Pilli, T. 2015. Study and optimization of osmotic dehydration of cherry tomatoes in complex solution by response surface methodology and desirability approach[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 60(2): 641-648 [49]Lyu J, Chen Q Q, Bi J F, Zeng M C, Wu X Y. Drying Characteristics and Quality of Kiwifruit Slices with/without Osmotic Dehydration under Short- and Medium-Wave Infrared Radiation Drying[J]. International Journal of Food Engineering, 2017, 13(8), 1-15. [50]毕金峰,方芳,丁媛媛,等.预处理对哈密瓜变温压差膨化干燥产品品质的影响[J].食品与机械,2010,26(02):15-18. [51]温馨,胡锐,赵金红,等.不同漂烫方式结合CaCl2预处理对哈密瓜品质的影响[J].农业机械学报,2014,45(10):231-237. [52]崔彩云,卢根昌,高东江,等.哈密瓜真空冷冻干燥工艺[J].食品研究与开发,2009,30(11):100-102. [53]GABRIELLA D D S, BARROS Z M P, DE MEDEIROS R A B, et al. Pretreatments for melon drying implementing ultrasound and vacuum[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2016, 74: 114-119. [54]Bai J W, Sun D W, Xiao H W, et al. Novel high-humidity hot air impingement blanching (HHAIB) pretreatment enhances drying kinetics and color attributes of seedless grapes[J]. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 2013, 20:230-237. [55]戚思影. 低频超声预处理对脱水香菇品质及风味的影响[D].扬州大学,2021. [56]刘德成,郑霞,肖红伟,等.红枣片冷冻-红外分段组合干燥工艺优化[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(17): 293-302. [57]CHEN Q, BI J, WU X, et al. Drying kinetics and quality attributes of jujube (Zizyphus jujuba Miller) slices dried by hot-air and short-and medium-wave infrared radiation[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2015, 64(2): 759-766. [58]牛玉宝,姚雪东,肖红伟,等.射频辅助热风干燥对红枣脆片质构特性和微观结构的影响[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(02):296-306. [59]钱婧雅,张茜,王军,等. 三种干燥技术对红枣脆片干燥特性和品质的影响[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(17):259-265. [60]Przybył, K., Gawałek, J., Koszela, K., et al. (2018).Artificial neural networks and electron microscopy to evaluate the quality of fruit and vegetable spray-dried powders. Case study:Strawberry powder[J]. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 155, 314-323. [61]李远志,蔡颖荷,鲍金勇,等.哈密瓜片干燥特性的研究[J].食品与机械,2005(04):32-34. [62]中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.GB 5009.3-2016.食品安全国家标准 食品中水分的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2017. [63]张茜,肖红伟,代建武,等.哈密瓜片气体射流冲击干燥特性和干燥模型[J].农业工程学报,2011,27(增刊):382-388. [64]Xiao H W, Law C L, Sun D W, et al.Color change kinetics of American ginseng (Panax quinquefolium) slices during air impingement drying[J]. Drying Technology, 2014, 32(4): 418-427. [65]LYU J, ZHOU L Y, BI J F, et al. Quality evaluation of yellow peach chips prepared by explosion puffing drying[J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2015, 52(12): 8204-8211. [66]巨浩羽,赵海燕,张卫鹏,等.相对湿度对胡萝卜热风干燥过程中热质传递特性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(5):295-302. [67]Onwude D I, Hashim N, Abdan K, Janius R, Chen G. Modelling the mid-infrared drying of sweet potato: Kinetics, mass and heat transfer parameters, and energy consumption[J]. Heat and Mass Transfer, 2018, 54, 2917-2933. [68]Doymaz I. Infrared drying of kiwifruit slices[J]. International Journal of Green Energy, 2018, 15(11): 622-628. [69]Cao Z Z, Zhou L Y, Bi J F, Yi J Y, Chen Q Q, Wu X Y, Zheng J K, Li S R. Effect of different drying technologies on drying characteristics and quality of red pepper (Capsicum frutescens L.): a comparative study[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2016, 96(10): 3596-3603. [70]Royen M J, Noori A W, Haydary J. Experimental Study and Mathematical Modeling of Convective Thin-Layer Drying of Apple Slices[J]. Processes, 2020, 8(12): 1562. [71]徐明月,郑金铠,毕金峰,等.柑橘皮中短波红外干燥特性和品质研究[J].中国食品学报,2017,17(08):64-73. [72]Doymaz I. Infrared drying of kiwifruit slices[J]. International Journal of Green Energy, 2018, 15(11): 622-628. [73]Onwude D I, Hashim N, Abdan K, Janius R, Chen G. The effectiveness of combined infrared and hot-air drying strategies for sweet potato[J]. Journal of Food Engineering, 2019, 241: 75-87. [74]吴靖娜,陈晓婷,潘南,等.不同干燥方式下海马干燥特性及其数学模型[J].现代食品科技,2020,36(12):133-142.DOI:10.13982/j.mfst.1673-9078.2020.12.0583. [75]Duan X, Zhang M, Mujumdar A S. Study on a combination drying technique of sea cucumber[J]. Drying Technology, 2014.10, 2010-2019. [76]侯皓男,毕金峰,陈芹芹,等.压差闪蒸干燥改善红枣脆片理化和营养品质的研究[J].现代食品科技,2019,35(11):1-10. [77]王磊,沈柳杨,郑先哲,等.微波干燥浆果过程中料层电场分布影响能量利用分析[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(4):1-10. [78]汤诗琪.哈密瓜风干片贮藏过程中品质变化及褐变机理研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2018:3-5. [79]齐琳琳.以干香菇为原料的香菇脆片加工工艺研究[D].无锡:江南大学,2013. [80]LiuYH, Wu J Y, Miao S A, et al. Effect of a Modified atmosphere on drying and quality characteristics of carrots [J]. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 2014, 7(9): 2549-2559. [81]PENG J, BI J F, YI J Y, WU X Y, ZHOU M, LYU J, LIU J N, 2018. Engineering Texture Properties of Instant Controlled Pressure Drop (DIC) Dried Carrot Chips via Modulating Osmotic Conditions[J]. Food and Bioprocess Technology, 11(9): 1674-1685. [82]陈学玲,黄文俊,钟彩虹,等.超声预处理对真空冷冻干燥猕猴桃片品质的改善作用[J].食品安全质量检测学报,2022,13(16):5314-5319. [83]刘云宏,孙畅莹,曾雅.直触式超声功率对梨片超声强化热风干燥水分迁移的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(19):284-292. [84]段续,徐一铭,任广跃,等.香菇分段变温红外喷动床干燥工艺参数优化[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(19):293-302. [85]Wu X F, Zhang M, Bhandari B, et al.A novel infrared freeze drying (IRFD) technology to lower the energyconsumption and keep the quality of Cordyceps militaris[J]. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 2019, 54: 34-42. [86]Wang X Y, Gao Y N, Li X H, et al.Effect of different drying methods on the quality and microstructure of fresh jujube crisp slices[J].Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 2021, 45: e15162. [87]白俊文,周存山,蔡健荣,等.南瓜片真空脉动干燥特性及含水率预测[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(17): 290-297. [88]宋悦,金鑫,毕金峰,等.超声辅助渗透处理对热风干燥及真空冷冻干燥黄桃片品质的影响[J].食品科学,2020,41(15):177-185. [89]刘云宏,李晓芳,苗帅,等.南瓜片超声-远红外辐射干燥特性及微观结构[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(10):277-286.
﹀
|
| 中图分类号: |
TS2
|
| 开放日期: |
2023-05-29
|