- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 吉比特高派现股利政策动因及效果研究    

姓名:

 张杨    

学号:

 20202216176    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 125300    

学科名称:

 管理学 - 会计    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 管理学硕士    

学位类型:

 专业学位    

学位年度:

 2020    

学校:

 石河子大学    

院系:

 经济与管理学院    

专业:

 会计    

研究方向:

 财务理论与方法    

第一导师姓名:

 杨兴全    

第一导师单位:

 石河子大学    

完成日期:

 2023-03-16    

答辩日期:

 2023-05-13    

外文题名:

 Research on the motivation and effect of high cash dividend policy of G-bits    

中文关键词:

 吉比特 ; 股利政策 ; 高派现     

外文关键词:

 G-bits ; Dividend policy ; High dividend policy     

中文摘要:

随着我国资本市场的不断发展,在证监会鼓励各上市公司积极分红的大背景下,越来越多的上市公司开始进行现金股利分配,同时派现水平也在不断提高,实施高派现股利政策的公司逐渐增加。合理的高派现行为不仅能为公司带来良好的声誉、树立良好的形象,还能吸引更多投资者,从而推动公司的可持续发展。然而,近年来,一些公司为了追求短期利益,不惜采用了超出公司实力的高派现股利政策,这不但侵犯了外部投资者的利益,也限制了公司的长远发展,很明显与证监会的理念相悖。而目前大多数学者对于高派现的研究都是从行业或者上市公司整体出发,研究高派现的动因和经济后果,针对某一具体公司的研究较少。因此,本文在国内外各学者、专家对高派现的研究基础上,以新兴行业互联网与相关服务行业中的龙头企业吉比特公司为案例,探究该公司实施高派现的动因以及实施后的具体效果,并提出相关建议。

本文采用了文献分析法、案例研究法、对比分析法以及事件研究法四种方法对案例进行研究分析。首先,本文对大量国内外相关文献进行梳理,总结出了有关股利政策和高派现的研究过程和现状。其次对股利政策和高派现的相关概念和理论基础进行了阐述,并以此为基础,以吉比特为案例,详细介绍了公司基本情况和上市以来每一年的高派现股利政策实施的具体情况,同时与同行业可比公司和行业均值进行对比,分析了解公司的高派现水平在行业中的地位。接着就是对吉比特高派现股利政策的实施动因进行分析,主要分为内外两个方面,内部动因是从公司的现金水平、经营状况以及内部治理等因素产生;外部动因则是由国家政策和市场环境决定。然后对高派现股利政策为吉比特带来的各种效果进行了分析,研究总结出对吉比特积极和消极两个方面的影响,在增加公司企业价值、市场反应、外部关注度的同时,也降低了公司偿债能力,并且还存在侵害中小股东利益的情况。最后分别从上市公司、监管部门和投资者三个方面提出建议,上市公司应该根据自身实际情况制定科学合理的现金股利政策,并优化股权结构、建立股权制衡机制以此来保护中小股东的利益;中小投资者也应该提高自身的专业知识水平,做到理性投资;监管部门需要根据上市公司的实力对其制定的高派现股利政策进行严格把控,同时还需要完善中小投资者保护机制以及搭建线上监督平台,从而规范上市公司的派现行为,保证资本市场的健康发展。

外文摘要:

With the continuous development of China's capital market, under the background of China Securities Regulatory Commission encouraging listed companies to actively pay dividends, more and more listed companies begin to distribute cash dividends, while the level of payout is constantly improving, and the number of companies implementing the policy of high cash dividend is gradually increasing. A reasonably high cash can not only establish a good image of the company, but also attract more investors, thus promoting the sustainable development of the company. However, in recent years, many listed companies have developed high dividend policies beyond the strength of the company for short-term benefits, which not only damages the interests of external investors, but also seriously affects the long-term development of the company, which is obviously not in line with the original intention of China Securities Regulatory Commission. However, at present, most scholars' researches on high cash start from the industry or listed companies as a whole, and study the motivation and economic consequences of high cash, with few researches on a specific company. So, based on the research of domestic and foreign scholars and experts on high cash, this thesis takes The G-bits Company, a leading enterprise in the emerging industry of Internet and related service industry, as a case to explore the motivation of the company's implementation of high cash and the specific effect after implementation, and puts forward relevant suggestions.

This thesis uses literature analysis method, case study method, comparative analysis method and event study method to study and analyze the case. First of all, this thesis reviews a large number of domestic and foreign relevant literature, and summarizes the research process and current situation of dividend policy and high cash. Secondly, it expounds the related concepts and theoretical basis of dividend policy and high dividend payout, and on this basis, taking G-bits as the case, introduces the basic situation of the company and the specific situation of the implementation of high dividend payout policy in each year since the listing. Meanwhile, it compares with the comparable companies in the same industry and the industry average to analyze and understand the position of the company's high dividend payout level in the industry. The third is to analyze the implementation motivation of G-bits High dividend policy, which is mainly divided into internal and external aspects. The Internal motivation is generated from the company's cash level, operating conditions, internal governance and other factors. The external motivation is determined by national policy and market environment. Then, it analyzes the various effects of the high dividend policy on Gigabit, and summarizes the positive and negative impacts on G-bits. While increasing corporate value, market response and external attention, it also reduces the company's debt paying ability, and at the same time, it also infringes the interests of minority shareholders. Finally, it puts forward suggestions from listed companies, regulatory authorities and investors respectively. Listed companies should formulate scientific and reasonable cash dividend policies according to their actual conditions, and optimize the ownership structure and establish equity checks and balances mechanism to protect the interests of minority shareholders. Small and medium-sized investors need to improve their professional knowledge level, rational investment; The regulatory authorities need to strictly control the high dividend policy formulated by listed companies according to their strength. Meanwhile, they also need to improve the protection mechanism for small and medium-sized investors and build an online supervision platform, so as to standardize the current behavior of listed companies and ensure the healthy development of the capital market.

参考文献:

[1]陈浪南,姚正春.我国股利政策信号传递作用的实证研究[J].金融研究,2000(10):69-77.

[2]吕长江,许静静.基于股利变更公告的股利信号效应研究[J].南开管理评论,2010,13(02):90-96.

[3]孙燕.我国上市公司现金股利政策研究——基于生命周期理论[J].现代营销(下旬刊),2019(1):36-38.

[4]王艺澄.上市证券公司股利政策与盈利能力相关性的实证研究[J].会计师,2020(02):5-7.

[5]周美华,兰明慧,张岩.现金股利与审计收费[J].审计研究,2021,13(6):116-128.

[6]李增泉.现金股利、投资者保护与所有权安排——来自我国上市公司的经验证据[C].转型经济下的会计与财务问题国际学术研讨会论文集(下册),2003:407-420.

[7]刘孟晖,侯月娜.南玻集团的异常高派现:成长不足抑或低代理成本[J].财会通讯,2018(17):106-110.

[8]冯华.控股股东利益输送视角下股利政策分析[J].财会通讯,2020, (06): 93-96.

[9]王春飞,郭云南.半强制股利政策与股权融资成本[J].金融研究,2021,(08):172-189.

[10]吕纤,向东进.现金股利迎合与股价信息效率[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2017,(6):170-178.

[11]谢知非.双重迎合与现金股利平稳性—基于中国A股上市公司的实证研究[J].会计研究,2019(11):78-84.

[12]蔡庆丰,陈熠辉,李超.产业政策,半强制分红与企业现金股利——基于中国资本市场的实证发现[J].厦门大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2021(2):137-149.

[13]许鹏.现金股利与投资者行为关系研究[J].财会通讯,2021(12):75-79.

[14]吴春贤,杨兴全.金融发展、产权性质与现金股利政策[J].中央财经大学报,2018(10):56-70.

[15]王欢欢.成长性、第-大股东持股比例与现金股利分配——基于创业板的经验数据[J].现代商贸工业,2018,39(19):112-114.

[16]段梦然,王玉涛,王瑞华.外部治理环境、现金股利和市场反应[J].中国会计评论,2019,17(01):49-78.

[17]吴翔,冯椿.零售业上市企业股利政策与业绩关系的实证检验[J].商业经济研究,2019(12):162-164.

[18]赵爱玲,赵康旭.上市公司高派现、高送转股利政策影响因素研究——以大富科技为例[J].财会月刊,2019(17):36-44.

[19]刘念.上市公司高现金股利政策的原因分析——以贵州茅台为例[J].全国流通经济,2019(31):86-87.

[20]冯美琪.A公司高派现股利政策动因分析[J].会计师,2021(08):15-16.

[21]陆正华,伍雪婷.“高派现+转股”模式能实现市值维护吗?——以用友网络为例[J].财会通讯,2020(24):161-165.

[22]晏婷婷.公司高派现行为经济影响分析[J].营销界,2020(05):35-37.

[23]温薇,张启文.现金股利、大股东持股与股价崩盘风险[J].会计之友,2020(03):69-76.

[24]王浩.股利政策选择与企业价值探讨—以洋河股份有限公司为例[J].当代会计,2021(20): 25-27.

[25]符永康. 华宝股份“清仓式”分红的动因及经济后果分析[J].审计与理财,2022(02): 47-49.

[26]段培阳,刘世超.2002年上市公司高派现现象研究[J].金融与经济, 2002(07): 5-7.

[27]赵英林,王秋霞.我国上市公司高派现行为探析[J].山东财政学院学报, 2007(02): 49-52.

[28]吴平,付杰,龙敏.股利分配政策对企业的影响研究——基于上市公司高派现与不分配现象实证分析[J].生产力研究,2011(10):195-196.

[29]杨兴全,李慧玲.我国上市公司高派现:理论与证据[J].石河子大学学报,2005,5(1): 49-52.

[30]董黎明.浅析上市公司异常派现[J].财会月刊,2004(20):55-56.

[31]Miller, Modigliani. Dividend Policy, Growth and the Valuation of Shares[J]. Journal of Business, 1961(4): 411-433.

[32]Gordon M J. The Savings Investments and Valuation of a Corporation[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1962(1): 37-51.

[33]Farrar D, Selwyn L. Taxes, corporate financial policy and return to investors [J]. National Tax Journal, 1967(12): 444-501.

[34]Jensen Michael C, William H. Meckling. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costsand Ownership Structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976(4): 305-360.

[35]Jensen. Agency Costs of Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers[J]. American Economic Review, 1986(5): 323-329.

[36]Berzins Janis, Bohren Oyvind, Stacescu Bogdan. Shareholder Conflicts and Dividends[J]. Review of Finance, 2019, 22(5):1807-1840.

[37]Bhattacharya, Sudipto. Imperfect Information, Dividend Policy and the Bird in the Hand Fallacy[J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1979(10): 259-270.

[38]Anwar S, Singh S, Jain P K. Cash dividend announcements and stock Return volatility: Evidence from India[J]. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015, 30: 38-49.

[39]H. Kent Baker, Imad Jabbouri. How Moroccan managers view dividend policy[J]. Managerial Finance, 2016, 42(3).

[40]Baker & Wurgler. Appearing and disappearing dividendsd[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2004(73): 271- 288.

[41]Stambaugh R F. Predictive regressions[J]. Journal of financial economics, 1999, 54(3): 375-421.

[42]La porta, Rafael Florencio, Lopez-de-Slianes, Anderi Shleifer and Robert Vishny. Agency Problems and Dividend Policy Around the World[J]. Journal of Finance, 2000(55): 1-33.

[43]Fama E and K French. Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics or Lower Propensity to Pay[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2001 (60): 3-43.

[44]Kevin C.K. Lam, Heibatollah Sami, Haiyan Zhou. The role of cross-listing, foreign ownership and state ownership in dividend policy in an emerging market[J]. China Journal of Accounting Research, 2012, 5(3):62-73.

[45]Arif A, Akbarshah F.Determinants of Dividend Policy: A Sectoral Analysis from Pakistan[J]. SocialScience Electronic ublishing, 2013, 3(9): 16-33.

[46]Kargar E F,Birjand H, Nejad K G. The Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanisms (ownership structure and board structure) on Dividend Policy of Companies[J]. Research Journal of Finance & Accounting, 2014.

[47]Jian-fei SHEN and Jian JIAO. Analysis of Factors Affecting the Dividend Policy of Enterprises[C]. Advanced Science and Industry Research Center:Science and Engineering Research Center, 2018:5.

[48]Nia Widyanti and Widyasari Widyasari. Factors Affecting Free-Cash-Flow (FCF) with Dividend Policy as a Mediating Variable[C]. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2020.

[49]Jensen Meckling. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976(4): 305- 360.

[50]Lang L and Litzenberger R. Dividend announcements: cash flow signaling vs free cash flow hypothesis[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1989(1): 181-191.

[51]Zhou P and Ruland W. Dividend payout and future earnings growth[J]. Financial Analysts Journal, 2006, 62(3): 58-69.

[52]Byron Y, RSY Chan, Song, L Fan. Dividend policy and investmentefficiency-The Changes of the Mandatory Dividend Payment[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2016(5): 76-98.

[53]Bhaskar Biswas. Evaluation of dividend policy of some selected public and private sector banks in India[J]. Accounting, 2018(1): 21-28.

[54]Berzins Janis and Bohren Oyvind and Stacescu Bogdan. Shareholder Conflicts and Dividends[J]. Review of Finance, 2019, 22(5):1807-1840.

[55]Hung Ngoc Dang, Van Thi Thuy Vu, Xuan Thanh Ngo, Ha Thi Viet Hoang. Impact of dividend policy on corporate value: Experiment in Vietnam[J]. International Journal of Finance & Economics.2021, 26(4): 5815-5825.

中图分类号:

 F23    

开放日期:

 2023-05-26    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式