- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 基于多案例的审计失败中函证不当问题研究    

姓名:

 张文静    

学号:

 20222216001    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 125700    

学科名称:

 管理学 - 审计    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 审计硕士    

学位类型:

 专业学位    

学位年度:

 2025    

学校:

 石河子大学    

院系:

 经济与管理学院    

专业:

 审计    

研究方向:

 注册会计师审计    

第一导师姓名:

 吕珺    

第一导师单位:

 石河子大学    

完成日期:

 2025-11-20    

答辩日期:

 2025-11-22    

外文题名:

 Research on the Problem of Improper Confirmation in Audit Failures Based on Multiple Cases    

中文关键词:

 函证不当 ; 审计失败 ; 会计师事务所     

外文关键词:

 Improper confirmation ; Audit failure ; Accounting firm     

中文摘要:

函证作为注册会计师获取外部审计证据的重要途径,以函证方式得到的审计证据具有较高可靠性。为了行业发展,相关部门持续完善制度建设并推进技术革新,不仅推出了一系列政策,如《关于进一步规范银行函证及回函工作的通知》《关于推进会计师事务所函证数字化相关工作的指导意见》等,还共建了第三方电子函证平台,实现函证收发、处理、存储的全流程数字化。然而在实务操作中,函证程序的执行效果与预期存在较大差距。2013-2024年间,中国证监会共发布了61例针对事务所的行政处罚决定书,其中44份指出事务所在审计实务中存在函证不当行为,占比高达72%,在胜利精密、蓝山科技等案例中,函证不当是导致审计失败的主要原因,这一数据充分表明函证不当问题在审计实务中普遍存在,严重影响审计质量。

本文选取立信所对龙力生物、中兴财光华对蓝山科技、天衡所对胜利精密的审计失败案作为研究对象,基于委托代理理论、信息不对称理论、现代风险导向理论并采用文献研究法、案例研究法和统计分析法,对案例事务所函证不当问题进行梳理。之后从中国证监会、中国注册会计师协会、财政局、巨潮资讯网中筛选整理数据资料,主要从审计主体、被审计单位、被询证方以及审计环境的角度分析成因。审计主体的原因主要有:(1)专业胜任能力不足,未勤勉尽责;(2)职业怀疑缺失;(3)独立性不足,职业道德缺失;(4)质量控制不充分,底稿填写随意。被审计单位的原因主要有:内部控制存在缺陷、蓄意舞弊导致函证失真。被询证方的主要原因有:回函责任主动性缺失、回函缺乏统一标准。此外,审计环境的原因主要有:传统函证方式有局限性、行业竞争压力大。最后,依次提出了防范函证不当的对策,包括:提升注册会计师的专业胜任能力确保函证全流程严格执行《函证》准则、把职业怀疑态度嵌入函证全流程、健全审计轮换与收费管控以强化独立性与职业道德保障、落实质量控制制度、重点关注被审计单位内部控制、紧抓被审计单位风险点实施针对性函证、建立系统化的主动管控与责任强化机制、与被询证方建立有效沟通机制、外部监管机构参与推进函证区块链线上平台建设并加强对执业环境的引导,建立良好的行业生态。

本文通过对多案例函证不当问题的研究,有利于丰富函证不当问题的研究领域、函证整体发展规范化科学化、函证监督效力化;同时,还希望能够在一定程度上有利于制造业发展规范化,助力行业健康发展;还希望能够帮助事务所优化审计流程、提升审计人员专业能力,进而提高函证质量,增强市场竞争力,实现可持续发展。

外文摘要:

As an important means for certified public accountants to obtain external audit evidence, the audit evidence obtained through confirmation has high reliability. For the development of the industry, relevant departments have continuously improved the system construction and promoted technological innovation. They not only introduced a series of policies, such as the "Notice on Further Standardizing Bank Confirmation and Reply Work" and the "Guiding Opinions on Promoting the Digitalization of Confirmation Work in Accounting Firms", but also jointly built a third-party electronic confirmation platform to achieve full digitalization of confirmation receipt, processing and storage. However, in practical operation, the execution effect of the confirmation procedure has a significant gap from the expectation. From 2013 to 2024, the China Securities Regulatory Commission issued a total of 61 administrative penalty decisions against accounting firms, among which 44 pointed out that the firms had improper confirmation behaviors in their audit practices, accounting for as high as 72%. In cases such as Victory Precision and Blue Mountain Technology, improper confirmation was the main cause of audit failure. This data fully indicates that the problem of improper confirmation is widespread in audit practices and seriously affects the quality of audits.

This thesis selects the audit failure cases of Lixin CPA Firm for Longli Bio, Zhongxingcai Guanghua CPA Firm for Lushan Technology, and Tianheng CPA Firm for Shengli Precision as research objects. Based on the principal-agent theory, information asymmetry theory, and modern risk-oriented theory, and using the methods of literature research, case study, and statistical analysis, it sorts out the problems of improper confirmation by the case firms. Then, it screens and organizes data from the China Securities Regulatory Commission, the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Finance Bureau, and the Juchao Information Network. The causes are mainly analyzed from the perspectives of the audit subject, the audited entity, the confirmation party, and the audit environment. The reasons of the audit subject mainly include: (1) insufficient professional competence and lack of due diligence; (2) lack of professional skepticism; (3) insufficient independence and lack of professional ethics; (4) inadequate quality control and random filling of working thesiss. The reasons of the audited entity mainly include: internal control deficiencies and intentional fraud leading to confirmation distortion. The main reasons of the confirmation party include: lack of initiative in response and lack of unified standards for responses. In addition, the reasons of the audit environment mainly include: limitations of traditional confirmation methods and intense industry competition pressure. Finally, it successively proposes countermeasures to prevent improper confirmation, including: improving the professional competence of certified public accountants to ensure strict implementation of the "Confirmation" standards throughout the confirmation process, embedding a professional skeptical attitude throughout the confirmation process, improving audit rotation and fee control to strengthen independence and professional ethics, implementing quality control systems, focusing on the internal control of the audited entity, conducting targeted confirmations based on the risk points of the audited entity, establishing a systematic active control and responsibility strengthening mechanism, establishing an effective communication mechanism with the confirmation party, and promoting the construction of a blockchain-based online confirmation platform by external regulatory agencies and strengthening guidance on the practice environment to establish a good industry ecosystem.

Through the research on multiple cases of improper confirmation, this thesis is conducive to enriching the research field of improper confirmation, promoting the standardization and scientific development of the confirmation process, and enhancing the effectiveness of confirmation supervision. At the same time, it is also hoped that it can contribute to the standardization of the manufacturing industry to a certain extent and promote the healthy development of the industry. It is also hoped that it can help accounting firms optimize the audit process, enhance the professional competence of auditors, thereby improving the quality of confirmation, enhancing market competitiveness, and achieving sustainable development.

参考文献:

[1]楼一沁.函证失败原因分析及优化对策——基于2014—2023年证监会行政处罚决定书[J].中国注册会计师,2024,(02):77-81.

[2]刘婕.风险导向审计模式下函证程序实务剖析[J].财会月刊,2024,45(06):85-91.

[3]时晓琼.关于函证质量提升的思考及建议[J].绿色财会,2023,(06):43-45+32.

[4]秦溶苑.区块链技术在审计函证工作中的应用研究[J].财会通讯,2022,(09):129-134.

[5]吴志强. 风险导向审计在银行函证程序的运用建议[J].财务与会计,2024,(14):64-65.

[6]郁乔乔,刘锟,汪子颖,等. 数字化审计函证可信系统研究[J].中国注册会计师,2025,(07):77-82.

[7]陈晓华,赵汉荣,周冰清.数字化函证建设的经验与思考[J].中国注册会计师,2022,(10):89-91+2.

[8]宋振玲.建设会计师事务所质量管理体系的认识与思考[J].中国注册会计师,2024,(04):85-88+5.

[9]彭淑娟,李永丽.注册会计师审计中函证程序的集约化执行现状及建议——以A事务所L函证中心为例[J].绿色财会,2023,(11):48-52.

[10]王琳璇.会计师事务所审计失败案例分析——以苏州胜利精密制造科技股份有限公司为例[J].审计与理财,2023,(08):48-50.

[11]陆喜阳.货币资金审计失败成因及防范对策——基于证监会行政处罚决定[J].中国注册会计师,2023,(06):66-69.

[12]陈伟,朱晓航.数字函证:机遇、挑战与方法[J].财务与会计,2023,(04):60-63+67.

[13]郭颖,李文文.会计师事务所审计程序不当问题研究[J].财会研究,2023,(02):58-63.

[14]万俊杰.企业函证数字化的相关思考和探索[J].中国注册会计师,2022,(08):80-82.

[15]赵丽锦,胡晓明,陈铂.银行函证数字化平台建设研究[J].财会通讯,2022,(13):152-157.

[16]汪素芳.会计师事务所审计程序不当浅析及改进建议——基于2021年度证监会监管[J].中国注册会计师,2022,(05):65-68.

[17]田丰.函证新规实施后的银行函证现状、问题及建议——基于银行视角的研究[J].中国注册会计师,2021,(09):65-67.

[18]程平,钱涂.基于RPA的函证程序审计机器人研究[J].财会月刊,2021,(17):86-91.

[19]彭俊英,陈艳芬,李安兰.函证数字化制度演进、实践现状与经验总结[J].财会通讯,2021,(15):146-149+156.

[20]程平,罗梦晴.基于RPA的货币资金实质性程序审计机器人研究[J].财会月刊,2021,(15):94-100.

[21]黄燕飞.从程序执行到平台建设提升银行函证质量[J].中国注册会计师,2021,(06):84-87.

[22]郭月梅,高斌,阮一吟.银行询证函的典型案例与改进建议[J].财政监督,2021,(07):100-104.

[23]陈卓,刘铭.上市公司财务舞弊问题分析及审计对策研究——基于2012-2017年证监会行政处罚公告[J].财会研究,2021,(02):39-43.

[24]卢芷旸.“勤勉尽责”庇护下的故意“疏忽”——以立信所审计金亚科技为例[J].财会研究,2020,(09):55-60+80.

[25]何柯吟.针对函证不当导致审计失败的反思[J].中国注册会计师,2020,(12):112-114+2.

[26]朱奕丞.执行银行函证程序中的问题及建议[J].中国注册会计师,2020,(09):75-77.

[27]马亚慧,温泉.疫情对注册会计师审计的影响及政策建议——从银行函证谈起[J].中国注册会计师,2020,(09):77-79.

[28]姜磊.注册会计师函证的质效保障路径研究:由程序到制度[J].中国注册会计师,2020,(06):80-83+3.

[29]李视友.由“康得新”案谈注册会计师银行存款函证程序的运用[J].财会研究,2020,(02):62-65.

[30]闵婕,曾欣韵.基于“互联网+”的审计函证流程信息化实施探析[J].财会通讯,2019,(22):113-116.

[31]沃巍勇,罗联玬.浅析函证不当导致审计失败的原因及其应对措施[J].中国注册会计师,2018,(05):81-83.

[32]邹香,陈联英.应收账款会计舞弊行为的审计[J].审计月刊,2005,(05):29-30.

[33]权红军.银行函证过程中的审计风险及应对策略[J].中国注册会计师,2018,(04):79-81.

[34]李莫愁.审计准则与审计失败——基于中国证监会历年行政处罚公告的分析[J].审计与经济研究,2017,32(02):56-65.

[35]陈郡,郭祎.“互联网+银行函证”审计流程的再造与优化[J].会计之友,2016,(23):117-119.

[36]石文先,张琼.关于银行函证信息化的思考[J].中国注册会计师,2016,(10):22-23.

[37]陈永宏,谭祖沛.用互联网思维改进银行函证及回函工作[J].中国注册会计师,2016,(09):20-22.

[38]柯丽.函证审计程序的实施现状及分析研究——基于银行存款函证和应收账款函证[J].现代经济信息,2015,(02):227-228.

[39]吴有庆.重大客户应收账款函证浅探[J].财会通讯,2013,(28):79-80.

[40]王宇慧,梅凡.大数据背景下函证程序的优化研究——基于函证数字化视角[J].华东科技,2024,(10):107-109.

[41]刘伟四.论函证应收账款的质量控制[J].财会月刊,2000,(20):29-30.

[42]陈晓刚.新审计准则下函证的监管思考[J].财会月刊,2012,(01):29-31.

[43]李春富.浅议货币资金的审计[J].绿色财会,2006,(05):33-34.

[44]唐琳.浅议银行函证[J].财会通讯,2010,(10):155-156.

[45]廖方福.审计应收账款的真实必须实施函证[J].审计与理财,2010,(04):47.

[46]黄秋菊.基于认定角度对函证程序的分析[J].审计月刊,2008,(09):46-47.

[47]程琳.“预付账款”舞弊表现及其审计[J].会计之友(上旬刊),2007,(10):34-35.

[48]赵金芳,黄元喜.对应收账款审计中函证问题的思考[J].财会月刊,2007,(15):64-65.

[49]赵金芳,黄元喜.做好函证工作提高应收账款审计质量[J].财会研究,2007,(04):69-70.

[50]张颖萍.应收账款函证审计程序的应用[J].财会通讯(综合版),2007,(03):66-67.

[51]Phillip T. Lamoreaux. Does PCAOB inspection access improve audit quality? An examination of foreign firms listed in the United States[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2016,61(2-3).

[52]MalaescuI, Sutton. The Reliance of External Auditors on Internal Audit's Use of Continuous Audit[J]. Journal of Information Systems, 2014, 29(1):95-114.

[53]Suttipun, Steane, Steane. The Influence of Corporate Governance, and SufficiencyEconomy Philosophy Disclosure on Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from Thailand[J]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 2018, 10(1):79-99.

[54]Kabir H, Su L, Rahman A. Audit failure of New Zealand finance companies-an exploratory investigation[J]. Pacific Accounting Review,2016, 28(3):279-305.

[55]Ramos M. Risk-Based Audit Best Practices[J]. Journal of Accountancy, 2009, 208(6):32-37.

[56]Akisik O, G. Gal. Financial Performance and Reviews of Corporate Social Responsibility Reports[J]. Journal of Management Control, 2014, 25(3-4):259-288.

[57]Caster P, Elder R J, Janvrin D J. A Summary of Research and Enforcement Release Evidence on Confirmation Use and Effectiveness[J]. Auditing A Journal of Practice&Theory, 2008, 27(2):253-279.

[58]Denise R. Hanes, Barbara M. Porcoand Jay C. Thibodeau. Simple SoupsInc: A Teaching Case Designed to Integrate the Electronic Cash Confirmation Processin to the Auditing Curriculum[J]. Issues in Accounting Education, 2014(02):349-369.

[59]Betty Chu,Yunsheng Hsu. Non-audit services and audit quality -- the effect of Sarbanes-Oxley Act[J]. Asia Pacific Management Review,2017.

[60]Caster Paul, Elder Randal J, and Janvrin Diane J. A Summary of Research and Enforcement Release Evidence on Confirmation Use and Effectiveness. Auditing, Nov 2008.

[61]Humayun Kabir,Li Su,Asheq Rahman. Audit failure of New Zealand finance companies – an exploratory investigation[J]. Pacific Accounting Review,2016,8

中图分类号:

 F239    

开放日期:

 2025-12-15    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式