- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 宝武集团连续并购动因及绩效研究    

姓名:

 王子坤    

学号:

 20222116175    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 125300    

学科名称:

 管理学 - 会计    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 会计硕士    

学位类型:

 专业学位    

学位年度:

 2024    

学校:

 石河子大学    

院系:

 经济与管理学院    

专业:

 会计    

研究方向:

 会计理论与方法    

第一导师姓名:

 霍远    

第一导师单位:

 石河子大学经济与管理学院    

完成日期:

 2024-07-13    

答辩日期:

 2024-07-13    

外文题名:

 Research on the Motivation and Performance of Baowu Steel Group's Continuous Mergers and Acquisitions    

中文关键词:

 宝武集团 ; 连续并购 ; 并购动因 ; 并购绩效     

外文关键词:

   ; Baowu Steel Group ; Continuous M& ; A ; M& ; A Motivation ; M& ; A Performance     

中文摘要:

随着市场环境的不断变化,企业之间的竞争愈发激烈,仅依靠自身的发展很难能够在市场中取得优势,这导致很多企业将目光投向了外部扩张。连续并购作为企业外部扩张的重要手段之一,不仅能够提升企业的市场竞争力,而且能够降低行业的竞争激烈程度,促进整个行业的健康发展。长期以来,产业集中度低一直是困扰我国钢铁行业发展的老大难问题。国家发改委在《产业结构调整指导目录(2023年本)》中提出,为了构建以实体经济为核心、具有强大竞争力的现代化产业体系,必须采取有力措施推动钢铁等关键性行业加快联合重组。随着国家政策的支持和市场需求的不断增长,钢铁企业并购活动呈现出爆发式的增长态势。以宝武集团为代表的一批钢铁企业开始通过连续并购多家企业,实现规模扩张和产业布局的优化。钢铁企业实施连续并购,不仅能有效提高钢铁行业的产业集中度,更对国家经济的整体稳健运行有着深远意义。

本文以宝武集团的连续并购行为作为研究对象,以规模经济理论、协同效应理论、资源基础理论等作为理论依据,对宝武集团实施连续并购的动因及绩效进行了探究。首先,本文对宝武集团在2019-2022年的连续并购历程进行了回顾。其次,对宝武集团实施连续并购的动因进行了研究,得出了宝武集团实施连续并购的五大动因。随后,为了更好地体现实施连续并购前后宝武集团绩效的变化,本文利用宝钢2018-2023年的财务数据与非财务数据,综合采用事件研究法、财务指标法、经济增加值法、非财务指标法等研究方法,对宝武集团连续并购行为所产生的资本市场绩效、财务绩效和非财务绩效进行了综合评价。最后,得出了研究结论与管理启示,并总结了本文的研究不足及展望。

研究发现,宝武集团基于政府的引导和支持、追求规模经济、加强协同效应、获取客户资源、提升研发能力等动因,于2019-2022年间连续经历了合并马鞍山钢铁、太原钢铁、重庆钢铁等7次并购。资本市场绩效方面,由于7次连续并购均以无偿划转方式完成,不涉及金融工具作价,因此,资本市场反应并不积极。财务绩效方面,宝武集团在实施连续并购之后,财务状况和经营成果均获得了提升,资产管理水平则较为稳定,价值创造能力获得了长足的提升。非财务绩效方面,宝武集团通过实施连续并购,推动了构建多元化产业格局的进程,增强了技术研发能力,实现了对国内外市场的开拓,优化了内部经营流程。根据研究结论,本文得出了企业实施连续并购应顺应国家政策引导、合理选择并购标的、聚焦主业实施并购、借助整合机制实现协同效应等方面的管理启示。本文的研究发现丰富了钢铁企业连续并购行为动因与绩效方面的案例研究,为投资者有效评估连续并购企业的投资价值提供参考,为计划实施连续并购的钢铁企业提供经验借鉴。

关键词:宝武集团;连续并购;并购动因;并购绩效

外文摘要:

With the continuous change of the market environment, competition among enterprises has become increasingly fierce, and it is difficult for enterprises to gain advantages in the market by relying solely on their own development, which has led many enterprises to look to external expansion. As one of the important means of external expansion, continuous M&A can not only enhance the market competitiveness of enterprises, but also reduce the intensity of industry competition and promote the healthy development of the entire industry. For a long time, low industrial concentration has been a major obstacle to the development of China's steel industry. The National Development and Reform Commission proposed in the "Guidance Catalogue for Industrial Restructuring (2023 Edition)" that in order to build a modern industrial system with a solid core of real economy and strong competitiveness, it is necessary to take effective measures to promote the accelerated consolidation and reorganization of key industries such as steel. With the support of national policies and the continuous growth of market demand, M&A activities of steel enterprises have shown explosive growth. A group of steel enterprises represented by Baowu Steel Group have begun to achieve scale expansion and optimization of industrial layout through continuous M&A of multiple enterprises. The implementation of continuous M&A by steel enterprises can not only effectively improve the industrial concentration of the steel industry, but also has far-reaching significance for the overall stable operation of the national economy.

This thesis takes the continuous M&A of Baowu Steel Group as the research object, and explores the motivation and performance of Baowu Steel Group's continuous M&A based on the theory of economies of scale, synergistic effect theory, resource-based theory, etc. Firstly, this thesis reviews the continuous M&A of Baowu Steel Group from 2019 to 2022. Secondly, the thesis studies the motivation of Baowu Steel Group's continuous M&A and draws five major motivations for Baowu Steel Group's continuous M&A. Then, in order to better reflect the changes in the performance of Baowu Steel Group before and after the implementation of continuous M&A, this thesis utilizes Baowu Steel's financial and non-financial data from 2018 to 2023, and comprehensively adopts research methods such as event study, financial index method, economic value added method, and non-financial indicator method to comprehensively evaluate the capital market performance, financial performance, and non-financial performance generated by Baowu Steel Group's continuous M&A. Finally, the research conclusions and management implications are drawn, and the research deficiencies and prospects of this thesis are summarized.

The thesis found that based on government guidance and support, the pursuit of economies of scale, the enhancement of synergistic effects, the acquisition of customer resources, and the improvement of R&D capabilities, Baowu Steel Group experienced seven M&A from 2019 to 2022, including the mergers with Ma'anshan Steel, Taiyuan Steel, and Chongqing Steel. In terms of capital market performance, since all seven continuous M&A were completed through gratuitous transfers without involving the pricing of financial instruments, the capital market response was not positive. In terms of financial performance, after the implementation of continuous M&A, Baowu Steel Group's financial condition and operating results have been improved, asset management level has been relatively stable, and value creation ability has been significantly enhanced. In terms of non-financial performance, through the implementation of continuous M&A, Baowu Steel Group has promoted the process of building a diversified industrial structure, enhanced technological research and development capabilities, achieved the development of domestic and foreign markets, and optimized internal business processes. Based on the research conclusions, this thesis draws management implications such as enterprises should comply with national policy guidance, rationally select M&A targets, focus on the main business to implement M&A, and achieve synergies through integration mechanisms. The research findings of this thesis enrich the case studies on the motivation and performance of continuous M&A of steel enterprises, provide investors with a reference for effectively evaluating the investment value of continuous mergers and acquisitions enterprises, and provide experience for steel enterprises planning to implement serial M&A.

Key words: Baowu Steel Group; Continuous M&A; M&A Motivation; M&A Performance

参考文献:

[1]覃予,王基.上市公司跨行业连续并购如何实现高绩效——基于fsQCA的方法[J].经济研究导刊,2024,(04):58-62.

[2]于鸿鹰,何青松,何宗明等.组织学习影响科技型企业连续并购决策的实证分析[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(11):103-108.

[3]袁亮,柴林,刘江山.上市公司连续并购对企业价值的影响机理研究——基于东山精密连续并购案例[J].财会通讯,2024,(02):90-96.

[4]李文新,于婷.基于现金流的埃斯顿连续并购效应研究[J].商业会计,2022,(05):66-69.

[5]童迎香,潘雅琼.互联网生态视角下企业并购财务协同效应研究——基于阿里收购饿了么的案例[J].财会通讯,2021(02):105-109.

[6]崔永梅,李瑞曾,德麟.资源行动视角下并购重组企业协同价值创造机理研究——以中国五矿与中国中冶重组为例[J].管理评论,2021,33:(10):237-248.

[7]谢洪明,章俨,刘洋等.新兴经济体企业连续跨国并购中的价值创造:均胜集团的案例[J].管理世界,2019(5):161-178.

[8]马述忠,吴鹏,房超.东道国数据保护是否会抑制中国电商跨境并购[J].中国工业经济,2023,(02):93-111.

[9]何伟军,彭青玲,袁亮.中国企业海外并购动因、风险及绩效研究——基于韦尔股份收购豪威科技的案例[J].财会通讯,2022,(02):93-100.

[10]黄嫚丽,张钺,李静.基于时间过程视角的连续并购研究综述[J].管理学报,2020(9):1412-1422.

[11]张鑫敏,余学斌.全产业链战略下埃斯顿连续并购绩效研究[J].经营与管理,2022(11):85-97.

[12]周玲燕,王波,蒋玉娟.企业连续并购绩效评价与耦合协同性测度——以新希望乳业为例[J].商业会计,2023,(17):33-38.

[13]刘莹,丁慧平,崔婧.上市公司并购次序对并购绩效影响的实证检验[J].统计与决策,2021(11):185-188.

[14]李捷瑜,徐艺洁.学习效应、业绩反馈与连续并购[J].南方经济,2017(9):103-117.

[15]李敏.并购中“双高现象”与企业并购绩效——基于银行持股介入与最终控制人视角[J].财会通讯,2021(18):80-84.

[16]王杏芬,胡艳梅.连续并购商誉减值风险研究——以天神娱乐为例[J].财会通讯,2019(12):43-48.

[17]胡振,郭慧敏.控股股东控制下关联并购特征与并购绩效[J].财会通讯,2021(20):70-74.

[18]刘娇娆.以转型升级为导向的制造业民企连续并购绩效研究——以东山精密为例[J].财会通讯,2023,(06):112-118.

[19]林泓妍.医药企业连续并购经济效果研究——以华东医药为例[J].会计研究,2022,(2):156-158.

[20]夏扬,沈豪.基于长短期窗口的民企连续并购绩效研究——以均胜电子为例[J].财会通讯,2018(4):3-8.

[21]高伟凯.华贸物流连续并购绩效分析[J].经济研究导刊,2023,(20):82-86.

[22]梁永忠.突变级数下绿色并购三重绩效评价体系研究[J].会计之友,2020(14):103-109.

[23]贺天玥,冯体一,潘超.企业以技术获取为导向的连续并购绩效研究——以新时达为例[J].管理案例研究与评论,2021(3):339-354.

[24]张庆萍,陈新国.上市股份制银行基于EVA绩效的对标应用研究——以A银行为例[J].会计之友,2018(4):116-119.

[25]蔡炎君.并购行为对企业绩效的影响研究——以A公司并购B公司为例[J].会计师,2023,(23):50-52.

[26]朱红波.CEO经验学习、个性特征与企业连续并购绩效[J].财会通讯,2016(30):82-87.

[27]彭妍爽.上市公司并购商誉减值行为研究——基于准则弹性与盈余管理的视角[J].商业会计,2024,(05):69-72.

[28]杜晓雨.并购活动下可转换债券支付方式对风险的防控[J].财务管理研究,2024,(03):179-183.

[29]张岚,范黎波,鲍哿.为什么企业会连续并购?——来自我国制造业企业的证据[J].财会通讯,2018(10):10-17.

[30]苏新娣.国企并购后总公司与子公司财务整合的问题研究[J].财会学习,2024,(12):23-25.

[31]邓小军,徐国玲.基于WACC估值的央企EVA绩效考评标准探讨[J].统计与决策,2019(8):178-181.

[32]张晨宇,毛新述,毛聚.国企改革、国有资本布局优化与价值创造——基于中央企业并购重组的经验证据[J].管理科学学报,2023,(10):36-55.

[33]刘凯月,孙佩红,李天旭等.媒体情绪、资产误定价与公司并购绩效[J].财经理论研究,2024,(02):80-94.

[34]万筱雯,杨波.企业跨国并购的协同创新效应[J].财经研究,2023,(12):34-47.

[35]孙烨,侯力赫.上市公司为什么会连续并购:生来不同吗?[J].商业经济与管理,2022,(09):30-41.

[36]庄明明,李善民,梁权熙.连续并购对股价崩盘风险的影响研究[J].管理学报,2021(7):1086-1094.

[37]王艳,何竺虔,汪寿阳.民营企业并购的协同效应可以实现吗?[J].会计研究,2020(7):64-77.

[38]梁星,林新沛.腾讯跨国并购Sumo Group的并购绩效探析[J].财会研究,2023,(12):75-80.

[39]胥朝阳,高子欣,刘睿智等.海外并购、吸收能力与技术创新产出[J].财会通讯,2024,(04):29-34.

[40]孙贝宁.环保行业并购动因分析——以盈峰环境并购中联环境为例[J].会计师,2023,(18):58-60.

[41]马雨萱,李金茹.矿业企业海外并购动因及绩效分析——以紫金矿业为例[J].商业会计,2024,(05):65-68.

[42]李敏才,卢坪鑫.连续并购学习效应及绩效研究的案例分析[J].商业会计,2022,(24):39-42.

[43]田甜,胡漫玉,王坤等.康恩贝商誉减值策略案例研究——基于复合系统协同度模型[J].财会通讯,2022,(24):101-106.

[44]张晓旭,姚海鑫,杜心宇等.高新技术上市公司连续并购的同伴效应研究——企业研发的调节作用[J].科技进步与对策,2021,(6):65-74.

[45]刘李胜.上市公司产业并购的动因与方式[J].中国金融,2024,(04):60-61.

[46]杨超,张宸妍.外资并购与目标企业海外市场扩张[J].国际贸易问题,2024,(02):126-140.

[47]Schipper K, Thompson R.Evidence on the capitalized value of merger activity for acquiring firms[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 1983, 11(1-4):85-119.

[48]Billett M T, Qian Y.Are Overconfident CEOs Born or Made? Evidence of Self-Attribution Bias from Frequent Acquirers[J].Management Science, 2008, 54(6):1037-1051.

[49]Nihat Aktas, Eric de Bodt, Richard Roll.Serial acquirer bidding: An empirical test of the learning hypothesis[J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, Volume 17, 2011, Issue 1:18-32.

[50]Fuller, K, Netter, J, Stegemoller, M.What do returns to acquiring firms tell us? Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions[J].Journal of Finance, 2002, (57):1763-1794.

[51]Doukas, J.Petmezas.Acquisitions, Overconfident Managers and Self-Attribution Bias [J].International Journal of Quality&Reliability Management, 2003, (8):81-83.

[52]Anand J, Delios A.Absolute and Relative Resources as Determinants of International Acquisitions[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2002, (2):27-33.

[53]Croci.E.Why do managers make serial acquisitions?An investigation of performance predictability in serial acquisitions[J].International Journal of Quality&Reliability Management, 2005, (4):45-47.

[54]Jarrad H.What drives merger waves?[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2004, 77(3):24-28.

[55]Khlifi S, Zouaria G.The impact of CEO overconfidence on real earnings management:Evidence from M&A[J].Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, 2021, 20(3):402-424.

[56]Ismail A. Which Acquirers Gain More Single or Multiple? Recent Evidence From the USA Market[J]. Lobal Finance Journal, 2008, 19(1):47-50.

[57]Elangob, Panttnaik C.Learning before making the big leap[J].Management International Review, 2011, 51(4):461-481.

[58]David J M.Aggregate implications of mergers and acquisitions[J].Review of Economic Studies, 2021, 88(4):1796-1830.

[59]Andros Gregoriou, Binh Duy Nguyen, Tung Duy Nguyen etal.Robert Hudson Economic policy uncertainty and cross-border mergers and acquisitions[J].International Review of Financial Analysis, 2021, 78(6):53-55.

[60]Ayami Kobayashi (Tanaka), Marc Bremer.Lessons from mergers and acquisitions of regional banks in Japan: What does the stock market think?[J].Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 2022, 64(8):71-74.

中图分类号:

 F23    

开放日期:

 2024-07-17    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式