- 无标题文档
查看论文信息

中文题名:

 数据资产信息披露与审计师风险感知    

姓名:

 李啸雪    

学号:

 20212016067    

保密级别:

 公开    

论文语种:

 chi    

学科代码:

 120202    

学科名称:

 管理学 - 工商管理学 - 企业管理(含:财务管理、市场营销、人力资源管理)    

学生类型:

 硕士    

学位:

 管理学硕士    

学位类型:

 学术学位    

学位年度:

 2024    

学校:

 石河子大学    

院系:

 经济与管理学院    

专业:

 工商管理    

研究方向:

 公司治理与财务管理    

第一导师姓名:

 王生年    

第一导师单位:

 石河子大学    

完成日期:

 2024-05-17    

答辩日期:

 2024-05-08    

外文题名:

 Data Asset Information Disclosure and Auditor Risk Perception    

中文关键词:

 数据资产 ; 信息披露 ; 审计师风险感知 ; 经营风险 ; 信息透明度     

外文关键词:

 Data asset ; disclosure of information ; auditor risk perception ; operational risk ; information transparency     

中文摘要:

       党的二十大报告提出,要加快建设数字中国,加快发展数字经济。数据是数字经济时代的基础性资源,也是企业构建核心竞争力必不可少的要素。2023年2月,党的二十届二中全会审议通过的《党和国家机构改革方案》提出组建国家数据局,这为数据要素市场建设和数据资产价格链的形成提供了制度保障。现如今,数据资产在企业经营发展、转型升级等方面逐渐发挥重要作用,数据资产的价值不断提高。作为助推经济发展的核心要素,数据资产的管理和披露已成为资本市场上各参与者的热门话题,必然会引起资本市场的监督者-审计师的关注。已有文献围绕数据资产价值以及审计师行为的影响因素等方面展开了深入研究,但对数据资产信息披露影响审计师风险感知的探讨涉猎较少。企业披露数据资产一方面降低了信息收集成本,但同时造成的信息冗余也降低了信息质量,因此企业披露数据资产对审计师风险感知的影响尚不明确。

       基于此,本文采用文献研究与实证研究相结合的方法,结合委托代理理论、审计保险理论、信号传递理论和风险导向审计理论,以2007-2022年中国A股上市公司为研究样本,检验了企业数据资产信息披露对审计师风险感知的影响。首先,考察数据资产信息披露对审计师风险感知的影响;并从审计层面探讨了数据资产信息披露对于审计师风险感知的异质性作用;其次,从经营风险和信息透明度两个渠道分别检验了数据资产信息披露影响审计师风险感知的作用机制;然后,从公司特征和外部环境两个方面分别考察了不同情境下数据资产信息披露对审计师风险感知的影响有何差异;最后,探究了数据资产信息披露与审计师风险感知对审计延迟、审计质量以及股票特质风险的影响。

       研究结论如下:(1)数据资产信息披露提高了审计师风险感知,且当审计师不具备行业专长以及公司发生事务所变更时,数据资产信息披露提升审计师风险感知的作用更为显著;(2)机制分析表明,数据资产信息披露通过提高企业的经营风险、降低企业的信息透明度从而提高了审计师风险感知;(3)当企业高管具有数字化背景、企业数字化转型程度较高以及企业非高科技企业时,数据资产信息披露对审计师风险感知的提升作用更加明显;(4)当企业所处地区数字化外部环境较好、市场化程度较低以及媒体关注度较低时,数据资产信息披露能够显著提升审计师风险感知;(5)经济后果检验发现,数据资产信息披露提高了审计师风险感知,进而导致了审计延迟、审计质量降低以及加剧股票特质风险。本文的研究结论在为政策制定部门完善信息披露制度、加强资本市场监管提供重要参考的同时,对于促进资本市场的稳健发展和良性运行也具有重要意义。

外文摘要:

    The report of the 20th Party Congress proposed to accelerate the construction of digital China and the development of digital economy. Data is a fundamental resource in the era of digital economy, and an essential element for enterprises to build their core competitiveness. In February 2023, the Party and State Institutional Reform Programme considered and adopted at the Second Plenary Session of the Twentieth CPC Central Committee put forward the formation of a National Data Bureau, which provides institutional guarantee for the construction of the data factor market and the formation of the price chain of data assets. Nowadays, data assets are gradually playing an important role in enterprise operation and development, transformation and upgrading, and the value of data assets is constantly increasing. As a core element fuelling economic development, the management and disclosure of data assets has become a hot topic for various participants in the capital market, and will inevitably attract the attention of auditors, the supervisors of the capital market. The literature has conducted in-depth studies around the value of data assets and the influencing factors of auditors' behaviour, but there are fewer explorations on the impact of data asset disclosure on auditors' risk perception. The impact of corporate disclosure of data assets on auditors' risk perception is unclear, as corporate disclosure of data assets reduces the cost of information collection on the one hand, but the resulting redundancy of information also reduces the quality of information on the other.

    Based on this, this thesis adopts a combined approach of literature research and empirical research, integrating principal-agent theory, audit insurance theory, signaling theory, and risk-oriented auditing theory. Taking Chinese A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2022 as the research sample, it examines the impact of corporate data asset information disclosure on auditor risk perception. Firstly, it investigates the influence of data asset information disclosure on auditor risk perception; and explores the heterogeneous effects of data asset information disclosure on auditor risk perception from an auditing perspective. Secondly, it empirically tests the mechanisms through which data asset information disclosure affects auditor risk perception separately from the channels of operational risk and information transparency. Then, it examines the differential impact of data asset information disclosure on auditor risk perception under different circumstances from the aspects of company characteristics and external environment. Finally, it explores the effects of data asset information disclosure and auditor risk perception on audit delay, audit quality, and stock-specific risk.

     The research conclusions are as follows: (1) Data asset information disclosure enhances auditor risk perception, and its impact is more pronounced when auditors lack industry expertise or when there are changes in the accounting firm. (2) Mechanism analysis indicates that data asset information disclosure increases auditor risk perception by raising a company's operational risk and reducing its information transparency. (3) The enhancing effect of data asset information disclosure on auditor risk perception is more apparent when top management has a digital background, the degree of digital transformation within the company is high, and the company does not belong to the high-tech industry. (4) Data asset information disclosure can significantly enhance auditor risk perception when the company operates in regions with better digital external environments, lower levels of marketization, and lower media attention. (5) Economic consequences testing reveals that data asset information disclosure heightens auditor risk perception, leading to audit delay, reduced audit quality, and increased stock-specific risk. The research findings not only provide essential references for policy-making departments to improve information disclosure systems and strengthen capital market supervision but also hold significant importance for promoting the stable development and sound operation of the capital market.

参考文献:

[1]蔡春,鲜文铎.会计师事务所行业专长与审计质量相关性的检验——来自中国上市公司审计市场的经验证据[J].会计研究,2007,(06):41-47+95.

[2]蔡春,朱磊,郑倩雯,员晓.多个大股东与高质量审计需求[J].会计研究,2021(10):176-189.

[3]蔡利,毕铭悦,蔡春.真实盈余管理与审计师认知[J].会计研究,2015(11):83-89+97.

[4]陈凤霞,姜宾.ESG信息披露与审计费用[J].中国注册会计师,2023(06):56-61.

[5]陈娇娇,方红星.审计关系错配、盈余质量与整合审计收费[J].审计与经济研究,2019,34(01):24-32.

[6]陈胜蓝,马慧.会计师事务所行业专长、声誉与规模经济性的传递效应[J].审计研究,2013(06):84-92.

[7]陈正威.“逆向混改”影响审计师风险感知吗——基于异常审计费用视角的经验证据[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2023(04):28-40.

[8]陈作华,刘子旭.政企关系与企业特质风险[J].管理科学,2019,32(04):48-61.

[9]程小可.数据资产入表问题探讨:基于国际财务报告概念框架的分析[J].科学决策,2023(11):67-75.

[10]方红星,陈作华.高质量内部控制能有效应对特质风险和系统风险吗?[J].会计研究,2015,(04),70-77+96.

[11]冯婉昕,李闯.商业模式创新与审计收费——基于线上销售的视角[J].审计与经济研究,2023:24-34.

[12]韩国高,陈庭富,刘田广.数字化转型与企业产能利用率——来自中国制造企业的经验发现[J].财经研究,2022,48(09):154-168.

[13]郝莉莉.盈余管理方式与审计师风险感知研究[J].财经理论与实践,2016,37(04):71-77.

[14]胡耘通,刘道钦,黄冠华.税收规避与审计收费[J].会计研究,2021(09):176-189.

[15]黄莉,许冠斌.战略偏离度、内部控制质量与审计收费——基于经营风险的中介效应研究[J].财会月刊,2019(24):111-118.

[16]蹇薇,陈朝琳,郭绪琴.《企业数据资源相关会计处理暂行规定》实施要点及建议[J].财务与会计,2023(21):41-44.

[17]雷啸,唐雪松.会计信息可比性与公司违规行为[J].财经论丛,2021,(01):64-74.

[18]李红祥,吴佳珅.数据技术、数据资产与数据价值———大数据时代传统出版业的三重变奏[J].科技与出版,2016(08):111-114.

[19]李健,董小凡,张金林等.数据资产对企业创新投入的影响研究[J].外国经济与管理,2023,45(12):18-33.

[20]李明,万洁超.投资者保护、盈余管理方式与审计师风险感知[J].山西财经大学学报,2015,37(04):92-102.

[21]李明辉,刘笑霞.会计师事务所合并能提高审计效率吗?——基于审计延迟视角的经验证据[J].经济管理,2012,34(05):131-140.

[22]李世刚,鲁逸楠.年报文本信息相似性对审计收费的影响[J].财会月刊,2021(16):111-119.

[23]李淑华.上市公司年度报告审计意见之实证研究——统计特征及其信息涵义[J].审计研究资料,1998(08):1-34.

[24]李增福,冯柳华.企业ESG表现与商业信用获取[J].财经研究,2022,48,(12):151-165.

[25]刘文军,米莉,傅倞轩.审计师行业专长与审计质量——来自财务舞弊公司的经验证据[J].审计研究,2010(01):47-54.

[26]刘笑霞,李明辉,孙蕾.媒体负面报道、审计定价与审计延迟[J].会计研究,2017(04):88-94.

[27]陆正飞,王春飞,伍利娜.制度变迁、集团客户重要性与非标准审计意见[J].会计研究,2012(10):71-78+96.

[28]路征,周婷,王理等.数据资产与企业发展——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].产业经济研究,2023(04):128-142.

[29]罗玫,李金璞,汤珂.企业数据资产化:会计确认与价值评估[J].清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2023,38(05):195-209+226.

[30]马德林,杨英,张博源.中国企业:拿地还是创新?—基于上市公司无形资产信息披露[J].中国软科学,2012(11):170-182.

[31]马建威,李江,姜楠楠.公允价值变动、市场化程度与审计收费[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2020,35(6):56-67.

[32]聂兴凯,王稳华,裴璇.企业数字化转型会影响会计信息可比性吗[J].会计研究,2022(05):17-39.

[33]漆江娜,陈慧霖,张阳.事务所规模·品牌·价格与审计质量——国际“四大”中国审计市场收费与质量研究[J].审计研究,2004(03):59-65.

[34]钱春杰,周中胜.会计-税收差异,审计收费和“不清洁”审计意见[J].审计研究,2007(01):59-67.

[35]秦荣生.企业数据资产的确认、计量与报告研究[J].会计与经济研究,2020,34(6):3-10.

[36]邱丽娜.互联网信息披露,审计师决策与企业避税行为[J].财会通讯,2022(15):45-49.

[37]尚兆燕.法律对会计师审计意见的影响:实证检验[J].审计与经济研究,2009,24(05):22-33.

[38]申慧慧.注册会计师职级与审计师风险决策[J].审计研究,2021(02):80-91.

[39]沈宏亮,李杰,宋思萌.数字化转型对企业劳动需求的影响[J].软科学,2023,37(03):87-96.

[40]沈维成.债务期限结构会影响审计师风险决策行为吗——基于审计投入、审计费用和审计意见视角的研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2019,41(01):111-124.

[41]苏任刚,赵湘莲,房银海.创新创业发展、政府赋能与城市经济韧性[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2023,44(10):93-113.

[42]孙颖,陈思霞.数据资产与科技服务企业高质量发展——基于“宽带中国”准自然实验的研究[J].武汉大学学报:哲学社会科学版,2021,74(05):132-147.

[43]唐松,伍旭川,祝佳.数字金融与企业技术创新——结构特征、机制识别与金融监管下的效应差异[J].管理世界,2020,36(05):52-66+9.

[44]童丽静,伍彬,郭金同.投资者情绪与审计师谨慎性——基于审计风险感知的视角[J].会计研究,2023(08):179-192.

[45]王爱群,张宁,蔚泓翔.高管变更对审计费用的影响研究——基于审计师风险感知视角[J].税务与经济,2021(06):61-68.

[46]王福胜,王也,刘仕煜.媒体关注、管理者过度自信对盈余管理的影响研究[J].管理学报,2022,19(06):832-840.

[47]王嘉鑫,赵牧,黄翔等.复杂供应链网络风险识别下的审计质量研究——基于全球断供冲击的视角[J].审计与经济研究,2023,38(05):11-22.

[48]王垒,荣翠莲.上市公司ESG评级分歧的审计溢价效应—基于信息生产的视角[J].中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版):1-17.

[49]王守海,刘志强,吴韶珺.公允价值、行业专长与审计费用[J].审计研究,2017(02):48-56.

[50]王小鲁,胡李鹏,樊纲.《中国分省份市场化指数报告(2021)》[M].社会科学文献出版社,2021年.

[51]王雄元,高曦,何捷.年报风险信息披露与审计费用—基于文本余弦相似度视角[J].审计研究,2018(05):98-104.

[52]王艳艳,于李胜,安然.非财务信息披露是否能够改善资本市场信息环境?—基于社会责任报告披露的研究[J].金融研究,2014(08):178-191.

[53]王意德,张兵.注册制改革、投资者羊群行为与股票特质风险[J].现代经济探讨,2023(06):60-72.

[54]王应欢,郭永祯.企业数字化转型与ESG表现——基于中国上市企业的经验证据[J].财经研究,2023,49(09):94-108.

[55]王永海,汪芸倩,唐榕氚.异常审计费用与分析师语调——基于分析师报告文本分析[J].审计研究,2019(04):39-47.

[56]王裕,任杰.独立董事的海外背景、审计师选择与审计意见[J].审计与经济研究,2016,31(04):40-49.

[57]危雁麟,张俊瑞,汪方军,程茂勇.数据资产信息披露与分析师盈余预测关系研究—基于文本分析的经验证据[J].管理工程学报,2022,36(05):130-141.

[58]吴芃,庄鑫怡,谭磊.企业高管团队同质性、媒体关注与审计收费[J].会计之友,2023(06):134-142.

[59]吴武清,赵越,苏子豪.企业信息化建设与审计费用——数字化转型时期的新证据[J].审计研究,2022(01):106-117.

[60]伍利娜.盈余管理对审计费用影响分析—来自中国上市公司首次审计费用披露的证据[J].会计研究,2003,(12):39-44.

[61]伍利娜.审计师对采用差异化战略的客户区别对待了吗?[J].审计研究,2017(05):54-61.

[62]谢康,夏正豪,肖静华.大数据成为现实生产要素的企业实现机制:产品创新视角[J].中国工业经济,2020(05):42-60.

[63]邢立全,陈汉文.产品市场竞争、竞争地位与审计收费——基于代理成本与经营风险的双重考量[J].审计研究,2013(03):50-58.

[64]徐京平,朱哲茹.国家审计优化政府数据资产管理剖析[J].财会月刊,2023,44(22):76-84.

[65]徐莉萍,刘宁,张淑霞.异质性环境规制与企业盈余信息质量[J].会计与经济研究,2022,36(05):54-75.

[66]徐寿福,徐龙炳.信息披露质量与资本市场估值偏误[J].会计研究,2015,(01):40-47+96.

[67]徐亚琴,宋思淼.审计师能识别企业的杠杆操纵吗?——基于审计意见视角的实证检验[J].审计研究,2021(06):102-115.

[68]许文彬,曹星瑶.会计师事务所变更、分析师关注度与私有信息精度[J].会计研究,2023(03):159-174.

[69]薛爽,叶飞腾,洪韵.会计师-客户关系与事务所变更[J].会计研究,2013(09):78-83+97.

[70]闫焕民,王浩宇,张雪华.审计师工作量压力、组织支持与审计意见决策[J].管理科学,2020(04):19-36.

[71]颜恩点,钱川阳.去杠杆策略、风险感知与审计质量[J].南京审计大学学报,2022,19(04):21-31.

[72]杨明增,张钦成,王子涵.审计报告新准则实施对审计质量的影响研究——基于2016年A+H股上市公司审计的准自然实验证据[J].审计研究,2018(05):74-81.

[73]杨善林,周开乐.大数据中的管理问题:基于大数据的资源观[J].管理科学学报,2015,18(05):1-8.

[74]杨兴哲,周翔翼.治理效应抑或融资效应?股票流动性对上市公司避税行为的影响[J].会计研究,2020(09):120-133.

[75]尹美群,李文博.网络媒体关注、审计质量与风险抑制——基于深圳主板A股上市公司的经验数据[J].审计与经济研究,2018,33(04):24-33.

[76]于连超,耿弘基,王雷等.绿色税制改革对审计费用的影响机制研究——来自《环境保护税法》实施的准自然实验证据[J].审计研究,2023,(04):139-149.

[77]于玉林.宏观视角下无形资产的创新与发展研究[J].会计与经济研究,2016,30(02):67-84.

[78]袁淳,肖土盛,耿春晓等.数字化转型与企业分工:专业化还是纵向一体化[J].中国工业经济,2021(09):137-155.

[79]袁蓉丽,李瑞敬,李百兴.董事高管责任保险与审计费用[J].审计研究,2018(02):55-63.

[80]苑泽明,于翔,李萌.数据资产信息披露、机构投资者异质性与企业价值[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2022,42(11):32-47.

[81]曾彩霞,朱雪忠.欧盟对大数据垄断相关市场的界定及其启示——基于案例的分析[J].德国研究,2019,34(01):111-124.

[82]翟丽丽,王佳妮.移动云计算联盟数据资产评估方法研究[J].情报杂志,2016,35(06):130-136.

[83]翟胜宝,许浩然,刘耀淞等.控股股东股权质押与审计师风险应对[J].管理世界,2017,(10):51-65.

[84]张建平,余玉苗.媒体监督影响审计定价吗——来自中国证券市场的初步证据[J].山西财经大学学报,2013,35(03):102-112.

[85]张俊民,李会云.接受关联担保与审计收费——基于违规风险和过度负债的机制检验[J].审计与经济研究,2022,37(01):33-41.

[86]张俊民,张晓,肖志超.媒体负面报道与审计契约稳定性—基于事务所组织形式变更视角的分析[J].商业研究,2017(07):9-14.

[87]张俊瑞,李文婷.客户集中度与数据资产信息披露——基于文本分析的经验证据[J].财会月刊,2023,44(07):3-10.

[88]张俊瑞,刘慧,杨蓓.未决诉讼对审计收费和审计意见类型的影响研究[J].审计研究,2015,(01):67-74.

[89]张俊瑞,危雁麟,宋晓悦.企业数据资产的会计处理及信息列报研究[J].会计与经济研究,2020,34(03):3-15.

[90]张鸣,田野,陈全.制度环境、审计供求与审计治理——基于我国证券市场中审计师变更问题的实证分析[J].会计研究,2012(05):77-85+94.

[91]张艺琼,冯均科,姜丽莎.管理层业绩预告披露、媒介反应与审计意见[J].当代财经,2018,(12):112-122.

[92]赵辉,韩志霞.经营不确定性、供应链集中度与注册会计师审计风险感知[J].财会通讯,2019(21):44-47.

[93]赵丽芳,曹新宇,边琰澔.企业数据资产创造价值的底层逻辑问题研究[J].会计之友,2024(06):51-58.

[94]赵子夜,杨庆,杨楠.言多必失?管理层报告的样板化及其经济后果[J].管理科学学报,2019,(03):53-70.

[95]郑建明,孙诗璐.税收征管与审计费用——来自“金税三期”的准自然实验证据[J].审计研究,2021(04):43-52.

[96]周美华,兰明慧,张岩.现金股利与审计收费[J].审计研究,2021,(06):116-128.

[97]朱朝晖,李敏鑫,王江寒等.环境污染责任保险与审计费用[J].审计研究,2021(01):59-70.

[98]朱松,陈关亭.会计稳健性与审计收费:基于审计风险控制策略的分析[J].审计研究,2012,(01):87-95.

[99]朱文莉,丁洁.公司战略差异、内部控制与审计师决策[J].南京审计大学学报,2019,16(05):12-22.

[100]Beasley M. S. An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud [J]. The Accounting Review, 1996,71(04):443-465.

[101]Bratten B, Gaynor L M Mcdaniel L et al. The audit of fair values and other estimates: the effects of underlying environmental,task,and auditor-specific factors[J]. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,2013,32(3):7-44.

[102]Carcello, Terry, L. Neal. Audit Committee Composition and Auditor Reporting [J]. The Accounting Review,2000,75(04):453-467.

[103]Chalmers K, Clinch G, Godfrey J M, et al. Intangible assets, IFRS and analysts′ earnings forecasts[J]. Accounting & Finance,2012,52(03):691-721.

[104]Chen P.F., S.He, Z.Ma and D Stice.The Information Role of Audit Opinions in Debt Contracting[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2016,61(1):121-144.

[105]Cohen J R, Hanno D M. Auditors' consideration of corporate governance and management control philosophy in preplanning and planning judgments[J]. A Journal of Practice & Theory,2000,19(02):133-146.

[106]Dhaliwal D S, Li O Z, Tsang A, et al. Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting[J]. The Accounting Review,2011,86(01):59-100.

[107]Edmans A. Does the Stock Market Fully Value Intangibles? Employee Satisfaction and Equity Prices[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2011,101(03):621-640.

[108]Fanning K, Drogt E. Big data: New opportunities for M&A[J]. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance,2014,25(02):27-34.

[109]Gil Soo Bae, Seung Uk Choi, Jae Eun Lee .Auditor Industry Specialization and Audit Pricing and Effort [J]. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,2019,38(01):51-75.

[110]Gunasekara A., Papadopoulos T., Dubey R.. Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational perfor‐mance [J]. Journal of Business Research,2017,70:308-317.

[111]Hogan C E , Wilkins M S .Evidence on the Audit Risk Model: Do Auditors Increase Audit Fees in the Presence of Internal Control Deficiencies?[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research,2008,25(1):219-242.

[112]Jagan Krishnan, Jayanthi Krishnan. The Role of Economic Trade-Offs in the Audit Opinion Decision: An Empirical Analysis [J]. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance,1996,29(08):565-586.

[113]Jere R, Jagan K. Accounting Accruals and Auditor Reporting Conservatism[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research,1999,16(01):135-165.

[114]Joe J R.Why Press Coverage of a Client Influences the Audit Opinion[J]. Journal of Accounting Research,2003,41(1):109-133.

[115]Joseph, V. Carcello et al. Board Characteristics and Audit Fees [J]. Contemporary Accounting Research,2002,19(03):365-384.

[116]Julia, L. Higgs, Terrance, R. Skantz. Audit and Nonaudit Fees and the Market’s Reaction to Earnings Announcements [J]. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory,2006,25(01):1-26.

[117]Knaut A. How CSR should understand digitalization[M]. Berlin CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham,2017,249-256.

[118]Lennox, C. Do Companies Successfully Engage in Opinion Shopping? Evidence from the UK [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics,2000,29(03):321-337.

[119]Llopis-Albert C., Rubin F., Valero F. Impact of digital transformation on the automotive

industry[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2021,Vol.162(1):47-86.

[120]Matolcsy Z, Wyatt A. Capitalized intangibles and financial analysts [J]. Accounting & Finance,2006,46(03):457-479.

[121]O'Keefe T B , King R D , Gaver K M .Audit Fees, Industry Specialization, and Compliance with GAAS Reporting Standards[J]. Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory,1994,13(2):41-55.

[122]Opresnik D., Taisch M. The value of Big Data in servitization [J]. International Journal of Production Economics,2015,165:174-184.

[123]Perrons R K, Jensen J W. Data as an Asset: What the Oil and Gas Sector Can Learn from Other Industries about “Big Data”[J]. Energy Policy,2015,81:117-121.

[124]Petersen M. A. Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches[J]. Review of Financial Studies,2009,22(01):435-480.

[125]Prasanna T. Big Data Investment, Skills, and Firm Value[J]. Management Science,2014,60(06):1452-1469.

[126]Rialti R, Zollo L, Ferraris A, et al. Big Data Analytics Capabilities and Performance: Evidence from a Moderated Multi-Mediation model[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2019,149(12):1-10.

[127]Ritter A,Wells P. Identifiable Intangible Asset Disclosures,Stock Prices and Future Earnings[J]. Accounting & Finance,2006,46(5):843-863.

[128]Rogers J. L, Buskirk A. Vb, Zechman S. L. C. Disclosure tone and shareholder litigation[J]. Accounting Review,2011(06):2155-2183.

[129]Simunic D. The Pricing of Audit Services:Theory and Evidence[J]. Journal of Accounting Research,1980,18(01):41-50.

[130]Tambe P. Big Data Investment, Skills, and Firm Value [J]. Management Science,2014,60(06):1452-1469.

[131]Tanyi P , Raghunandan K , Barua A .Audit Report Lags after Voluntary and Involuntary Auditor Changes[J]. Accounting Horizons,2010,24(4):671-688.

[132]Tasker S C. Bridging the Information Gap: Quarterly Conference Calls as a Medium for Voluntary Disclosure[J]. Review of Accounting Studies,1998,3(1-2):137-167.

[133]Wang Y., Kung A. L. Big data analytics: Understanding its capabilities and potential benefits for healthcare organizations[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2018,126:3-13.

[134]Warren Jr J D, Moffitt K C, Byrnes P. How Big Data Will Change Accounting[J]. Accounting Horizons,2015,29(02):397-407.

[135]Wyatt A. Accounting Recognition of Intangible Assets: Theory and Evidence on Economic Determinants[J]. Accounting Review,2005,80(03):967-1003.

[136]Yun Y, Chun H.Economic Policy Uncertainty and Audit Effort: Evidence from Audit Hours[J]. Managerial Auditing Journal,2021,36(4):643-662.

[137]Zerni, M. Audit partner specialization and audit fees: Some evidence from Sweden[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research,2012,29(01):312-340.

中图分类号:

 F239    

开放日期:

 2024-05-20    

无标题文档

   建议浏览器: 谷歌 火狐 360请用极速模式,双核浏览器请用极速模式